Vasily.B 529 Posted October 24, 2016 Yeah true, Will this also remove those lines from the night's sky? Because that's where they are very obvious for me. Thats a very good question - one of most annoying visual glitches since A1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmybulmer 21 Posted October 24, 2016 No difference... Really? It has made it appear way smoother, removing the bumpy sort of affect that ads maps had 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kydoimos 916 Posted October 25, 2016 No difference... Try enlarging the image - the gradiated lines on the left are quite distinct. I must admit, looking at the thumbnail image, I wasn't quite sure, but on closer inspection, it became very clear :) A very significant improvement, nice! 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
old_painless 183 Posted October 25, 2016 In the picture, the beam (at the top) looks better with more detail showing with ADSHQ. Is that the intention ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sniperwolf572 758 Posted October 25, 2016 I've exaggerated the image a bit for those who still can't see the difference to better illustrate it. Hopefully it's pretty obvious now how much color banded the shadow is on the left side and how it's hardly noticeable on the right. The texture under the shadow is not affected, just the "shadow layer". As you can see, the left side looks like a block of Kit-Kats before you've eaten them, while the right side looks like that same block of Kit-Kats the day after you've eaten them. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
domokun 515 Posted October 26, 2016 I don't understand why BI just don't Image Comparison sliders: http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/js-image-comparison-sliders/ It's easy and it would make comparing images much easier. Particularly when the difference is so subtle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted October 26, 2016 I don't understand why BI just don't Image Comparison sliders: http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/js-image-comparison-sliders/ It's easy and it would make comparing images much easier. Particularly when the difference is so subtle. They used it to present the visual upgrade, but here it's only a picture quickly posted on forums to present the feature to the community. Doesn't need a slider. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
domokun 515 Posted October 26, 2016 They used it to present the visual upgrade, but here it's only a picture quickly posted on forums to present the feature to the community. Doesn't need a slider. If people are having a hard time seeing the difference, I'd say anything that helps is better, right? Afterall, it's not difficult and it works better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vasily.B 529 Posted October 26, 2016 Bohemia, small features makes this game big, thats what we can read from your changelogs. And everything would be goog, but.... https://feedback.bistudio.com/T119870And i got question - can someone of you type any key in controls menu to mouse scroll? 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R3vo 2654 Posted October 27, 2016 Anyone else having this issue after today's update? Seems to be the only type of building that is affected. http://imgur.com/a/JuGY1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HeroesandvillainsOS 1504 Posted October 27, 2016 Are the AI voices fixed on dev branch? I could have sworn that fix made it into stable but I'm still getting the crackly/distorted speaking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
x3kj 1247 Posted October 28, 2016 leaving us Dutchies to hold the Bohemia Interactive fort :ph34r: quick, storm the castle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted October 28, 2016 I don't understand why BI just don't Image Comparison sliders: http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/js-image-comparison-sliders/ It's easy and it would make comparing images much easier. Particularly when the difference is so subtle. I think that you made a point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R3vo 2654 Posted October 28, 2016 Thanks devs for listening to our feedback. The improvements made to the create task module and the increase width for the multi line attribute control are very welcome ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Solar 22 Posted October 28, 2016 Since Apex update the game stutters and hitches constantly. It has been unplayable since then. Im on an i7 6700k at 4.5 Windows 10 latest build Gtx 1080 all nvidia drivers are the same. Running on ssd Constantly freezes then jumps forward to catch up. Did not do this before Apex. The game used to be very smooth for me. Now even in the editor it stutters. I can get high fps but still have stutters and hitching When Apex was a beta it stuttered while the normal build did not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ceeeb 147 Posted October 28, 2016 Current dev build has no vegetation or rocks shown on the map for Altis and Stratis. https://feedback.bistudio.com/T120726 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kydoimos 916 Posted October 29, 2016 Are the AI voices fixed on dev branch? I could have sworn that fix made it into stable but I'm still getting the crackly/distorted speaking. Last time I checked, I don't think the fix was on stable - presuming it's sorted on dev branch, can anyone confirm? :) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vasily.B 529 Posted October 29, 2016 Since Apex update the game stutters and hitches constantly. It has been unplayable since then. Im on an i7 6700k at 4.5 Windows 10 latest build Gtx 1080 all nvidia drivers are the same. Running on ssd Constantly freezes then jumps forward to catch up. Did not do this before Apex. The game used to be very smooth for me. Now even in the editor it stutters. I can get high fps but still have stutters and hitching When Apex was a beta it stuttered while the normal build did not. Thats pretty strange on your PC. I want to buy same CPU, GPU MSI RX480Gaming X 4GB, with 2300Mhz RAM DDR4 (exacly same kit i'm on now at friend). Did you tried on diferent mallocs, systems? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted October 29, 2016 I've watched this video and I have additional questions. Will you have to rewrite all of Arma features in Enforce Script? Won't it create issues for backward compatibility? Does it mean that the community creators will have to learn a new way to create content? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teabagginpeople 398 Posted October 29, 2016 Thats pretty strange on your PC. I want to buy same CPU, GPU MSI RX480Gaming X 4GB, with 2300Mhz RAM DDR4 (exacly same kit i'm on now at friend). Did you tried on diferent mallocs, systems? Apologies for offtopic. Vaisly is there any particular reason you opted for the rx 480 over a gtx 1060? Maybe you have a freesync monitor. But in my part of the world the gtx 1060 6gb can be bought for around same price as the rx 480 4gb gaming. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R3vo 2654 Posted October 29, 2016 I've watched this video and I have additional questions. Will you have to rewrite all of Arma features in Enforce Script? Won't it create issues for backward compatibility? Does it mean that the community creators will have to learn a new way to create content? He pretty much answered your question in the video. SQF and EnScript are very different and there is no way to automatically convert SQFto EnScript. So it will most likely mean, we all have to rewrite everything from scratch because there's no backwards compatibility. That is actually a good thing, because it means no-one will be able to port over slow SQF or SQS scripts into the new Arma game (or what ever it might be) Furthermore, the need to rewrite everything from scratch means there is alot of potential for improvements of existing scripts and functions. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted October 29, 2016 Yup, indeed, but I was also wondering about the workload. It will take a lot of resources to adapt everything, manpower and time. I hope it's worth it, but I understand that they want a more modern platform. On modders/community side, it may be an major issue to have to rework everything in order to let content work in future games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alwarren 2767 Posted October 29, 2016 That is actually a good thing, because it means no-one will be able to port over slow SQF or SQS scripts into the new Arma game (or what ever it might be) I cringed when I read this statement. From what I have seen on-screen of the new scripting language and what is mentioned on the Take On Mars forum, it looks very different from SQF (more in line with C++/C#), so automatic conversion might not be feasible from an economics point of view. But it doesn't have anything whatsoever to do with SQF's speed of execution. An automatic or semi-automatic conversion would mean you could quickly port from Arma 3 to Arma 4 and then start to optimize/rewrite code. And while the absence of this is not the end of the world, it is beyond me how or why anybody has to spin it into "good news" 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R3vo 2654 Posted October 29, 2016 An automatic or semi-automatic conversion would mean you could quickly port from Arma 3 to Arma 4 and then start to optimize/rewrite code. And while the absence of this is not the end of the world, it is beyond me how or why anybody has to spin it into "good news" Okay, maybe "good news" isn't the right term. My concern is the following: If an automatic conversion would be possible and the code would run fine afterwards, how many scripters modders would actually spend time on it to optimise/rewrite their code? Many wouldn't in my opinion. Anyway, we digress, this is totally of topic of this thread and highly speculative at the present time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fn_Quiksilver 1636 Posted October 30, 2016 Okay, maybe "good news" isn't the right term. My concern is the following: If an automatic conversion would be possible and the code would run fine afterwards, how many scripters modders would actually spend time on it to optimise/rewrite their code? Many wouldn't in my opinion. Anyway, we digress, this is totally of topic of this thread and highly speculative at the present time. On the bright side it may mean BI will actually make their own playable content, since they won't be able to rely on community content from day 1. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
