Pre-announcement ARG answers to questions discussion

[rye1 21]

No.

:D

[the_antipop 10]

"Considering the ASCII animation we saw showing a ball smashing a wall, is BIS planning to add more complex destruction physics to buildings in Arma3?" - MadDogX, Sergeantshizzle, the_antipop

No"

sadface! :P haha. dammit.

[roberthammer 582]

Damu you could answer everything as Spoiler :(

lol

[blu3sman 11]

Interesting:headscratch:

"Was there some hidden code on the map found in the first hack?" - PBishop

Not directly for ARG

[bobocz 10]

Thanks Damu. It was really fun.

Are answers yes and no possibly interpreted as 'binary' one and zero ? (you never know ;) )

:D

[Murphe 0]

Interesting:headscratch:

My thoughts exactly, very curious about that.

[pettka 694]

Damu you could answer everything as Spoiler :(

It was 15 out of 20, five spoilers are for the questions not to be answered.

[Tonci87 163]

But you also didn´t really answer the last question (maybe is not Yes or No), that makes 6 unanswered. :p

So here comes the Bonus Question, feel free to answer it.

Will there be drivable Naval assets that are bigger than a Fisherboat? :rolleyes:

[PuFu 4591]

Thank you for your answers :)

[txalin 2]

too many spoilers... :(

[maddogx 13]

• "Considering the ASCII animation we saw showing a ball smashing a wall, is BIS planning to add more complex destruction physics to buildings in Arma3?" - MadDogX, Sergeantshizzle, the_antipop
  
  No

This seems to be pretty clear: no improved building destruction.

• "Is the quote "The world will change" related to new terrain technology?" - neokika
  
  No

  
  

This, however, simply means that the quote is not related to new terrain technology. Whether or not new terrain tech is being developed is ambiguous. :)

[Maio 293]

Thanks for the answers !

[krazikilla 5]

This seems to be pretty clear: no improved building destruction.

...

Thats so.. just.. wrong.

I just believe he said no, to make us more happy when we see its actually still in :o

[Zipper5 74]

too many spoilers... :(

Remember people, 20 questions were submitted but only 15 were to be answered. There are 20 questions displayed, 5 of which have Spoiler written where their answer would usually be. Therefore, all the questions that were said were going to be answered were answered. ;)

[danny96 79]

what is "ARG" ?

[Smurf 12]

what is "ARG" ?

Argentina.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternate_reality_game

[Maio 293]

what is "ARG" ?

Alternate reality game .

Btw it's nice to see spoiler on the china question :D

[ScratcH1 10]

Thanks for answering the questions :)

"If the Astute submarine is included, will it be controlable/drivable by the player?" - Babylonjoke, Tonci87

Hard to tell, we don't know yet

I really hope that naval vehicles are drivable by the player and not just a static object.

[lNTRUDER 26]

Thanks Damu for the answers!

We had fun :D

[dale0404 5]

"The codes found on the RL map: 97 NAV, 91 NAV, 17 AB etc. Are they related to fictional military units?" - dale0404

Spoiler

So they are then!!!:D

[Trauma.au 10]

1. "Were screen caps of in game physics used as an aid to create the ASCII animation of the ball hitting the wall? " - Trauma.au
   
   No

   
   

2. "Considering the ASCII animation we saw showing a ball smashing a wall, is BIS planning to add more complex destruction physics to buildings in Arma3?" - MadDogX, Sergeantshizzle, the_antipop
   
   No

   
   

Well then... what does the animation elude to? I guess we have to wait until E3, I'm still holding hope for complex destruction physics for vehicles though.

[metalcraze 290]

Thanks for answering the questions :)

I really hope that naval vehicles are drivable by the player and not just a static object.

Driving a whole submarine isn't something a single player/driver can do.

[msy 22]

So many "no"s so far. Maybe we are too whimmy for the existing technology in RV series engine...

[Smurf 12]

So many "no"s so far. Maybe we are too whimmy for the existing technology in RV series engine...

Only 1 RV related question!

I lol'ed at:

"Were we supposed to gain access the P8h8.info FTP server?" - -Puma-

No

[ScratcH1 10]

Driving a whole submarine isn't something a single player/driver can do.

Of course not by a single soldier. You would still need a commander, driver, gunner,... but I know what you mean. You can't simulate a driveable submarine realisticly because you would need over 40 (or more) men to have it fully operational. Since ArmA is still a game I would be fine if it had 4 positions like a tank.