Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
StefX

New ArmA II Pictures!

Recommended Posts

The screens are cool, but as the "ArmA Combat Photography" thread has shown, cool screens don't necessarily translate into gameplay.

I'll celebrate once that sort of behavior is shown to work in motion - ie, a video of soldiers moving to the side of a tank, taking cover, then darting across a street (or similar). Until then, I think a grain of salt is warranted. smile_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the dark tones, the fact that the contrast is realistic and everything is not "OMFG SHINY" cept the windows, looks good so far, nice to the see the T-90 again, looks like she's seen some weathering.

Though I am curious about the ammo case, it seems to be normal mapped but it is in the shadows, same with the bolts and other details..normal maps in shade for more graphic realism or default texture...interested to see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What the hell ? Sasha/Niko Bellic/Zakhaev's son is really everywhere these times crazy_o.gif

Grrrreat screens notworthy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ArmA II: Behind Enemy Lines

[//img]http://thecia.com.au/reviews/b/images/behind-enemy-lines-2.jpg[/img]

Just something I noticed.

It looks amazing though. I hope that is how the AI really reacts.

Thats the guy!

I saw him on the ArmA 2 screenshot and I was thinking the whole damn evening where I knew his dress from. Man, thanks, you saved me ! notworthy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sasha/Niko Bellic/Zakhaev's son is really everywhere these times.

ROTFLOL!!!  rofl.gif

==============================================

I can't believe it's not OFP!  tounge2.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What the hell ? Sasha/Niko Bellic/Zakhaev's son is really everywhere these times  crazy_o.gif

Grrrreat screens notworthy.gif

nah, we'll kick that civilian as the first casualty of war, just to make sure pistols.gifyay.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah was also happy to see they aven though of such lil eastereggs like a Behind enemy lines unit so there are lots of possible scenarios.

And if the Ai really reacts the way the screens indicate then i surely need a new pant when playing this game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The new screens are worthless as they only show static animations stacked in a cinematic order.

They are cool though, but that could be said about 80% of the screens in the image thread.

Arma2:

SR_chedaki_attack.jpg

Behind enemy lines:

behind-enemy-lines-2.jpg

GTAIV:

91750_Le-personnage-de-Nico-Bellic-dans-GTA-4.jpg

COD4(warning graphic)

tounge2.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The new screens are worthless as they only show static animations stacked in a cinematic order.

They are cool though, but that could be said about 80% of the screens in the image thread.

Arma2:

tounge2.gif

is the AI being setanim or working acturally like that?(using tank as cover, shooting over fence instead of trying to go around them)
Yes, that is micro AI in action

then

The screens are cool, but as the "ArmA Combat Photography" thread has shown, cool screens don't necessarily translate into gameplay.

I'll celebrate once that sort of behavior is shown to work in motion - ie, a video of soldiers moving to the side of a tank, taking cover, then darting across a street (or similar). Until then, I think a grain of salt is warranted. smile_o.gif

as Dslyecxi said screenshot don't necessarily translate into gameplay, but at the same time i wish BI are not bullcraping to me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I belive it is, Bi never photoshop screenshots   inlove.gif

Theres a big diffrence between photoshoping a screenshot, and spending time to make a good looking screenshot with in game animations, that will not be replicated in normal gameplay. Hopefully thats not what these are... but untill we see a good video of the Micro AI in action, it will be impossible to tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I belive it is, Bi never photoshop screenshots   inlove.gif

Theres a big diffrence between photoshoping a screenshot, and spending time to make a good looking screenshot with in game animations, that will not be replicated in normal gameplay. Hopefully thats not what these are... but untill we see a good video of the Micro AI in action, it will be impossible to tell.

From the videos we have seen with AI using cover to the buildings also using hand singnals it could well be genual AI.. but we wont no untill a proper video trailer i guess. lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BIS, beg you, why on new screen from ARMA 2 on T90 tank there is DSHK machinegun huh.gif?

it is not in use since T55 huh.gif?

if you do not have model, please use mine, i donate it for free, just not make not real tanks in game :/

in this game you gave DSHK to T72, while in real there is NSVT

now i see the same on Arma2 :/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully its just a placeholder because if they do that wrong again then that "mistake" can only be Intentional.  biggrin_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully, BIS have about 5~ months to release^^

When CM will show their gameplay... BIS will work days and nights to be twice as good^^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hopefully, BIS have about 5~ months to release^^

When CM will show their gameplay... BIS will work days and nights to be twice as good^^

they got to, if they want to match up with CM "throwing money into the sea" tactic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hopefully its just a placeholder because if they do that wrong again then that "mistake" can only be Intentional.  biggrin_o.gif

In the grand scope of things, the difference between a DShk and a NSVT in ArmA is almost nil, aside from a visual difference. For them to not change it would simply mean that they recognize that and felt like putting their efforts to something more productive and gameplay-influencing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hopefully its just a placeholder because if they do that wrong again then that "mistake" can only be Intentional.  biggrin_o.gif

In the grand scope of things, the difference between a DShk and a NSVT in ArmA is almost nil, aside from a visual difference. For them to not change it would simply mean that they recognize that and felt like putting their efforts to something more productive and gameplay-influencing.

Right if we arm the US soldiers with M16s and give them steel helmets it would also be ok because its only a visual difference.

Seriously if they add a few dozen realistic vehicles, real uniforms and so on then a NSVT should be a biggy.

However im pretty sure the DshK is just a placeholder...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C'mon its just a machinegun on a tank  tounge2.gif don't fret guys.

Its pretty static really compared say a gun you hold in your hands, a tank Mg doesn't have the same kind of wobleness or knock back when its fired compared to say a hand held Pk machinegun that isn't attached to a big metal thing wink_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×