Latest screenshots available

[chipper 0]

Nothing wrong with it.

It's just camera angle.

It looks fine in this pic

http://www.ga.com.ba/UserFil....8hi.jpg

[-=DBD=-TornSoul 0]

Man it's going to be a crying shame if I can't play this game.

[Espectro (DayZ) 0]

Initially, I agreed, but I think it's mostly due to the camera angle.

i think so. look at the wheels on the tracks, they are more oval than round

you couldn't just look at it, but had to tell from the shape of the wheel?

your spatial abilities are meager at best

What an aggressive way of posting. Your personal abilities are **** at best.

[sniper pilot 36]

Can anyone say: "You got owned by Espectro?"

Yeah i think its just the point of view from where the camera is looking at it.

[CameronMcDonald 146]

I think the T72 looks phat.

Hahaha - nice one, 'Spec. I also commend the pwnage - manners wouldn't go astray, thrush.

[icebreakr 3157]

mmmm anyone going to Peaceful Dragon tactical exercise?

[MAA3057 0]

Can anyone say: "You got owned by Espectro?"  

Negative.

Picture looks nice!

[bravo 6 0]

T 72, compair the front part that have some elevation:

<ul>ARMA model:

<ul>image 1

image 2

(even in OFP the T72 look better/similar then in ARMA)

Real model:<ul>

image 1

image 2

image 3

image 4

(source)

link 1 (Fast Specifications)

[dm 9]

T 72, compair the front part that have some elevation:

ARMA model:

...

(even in OFP the T72 look better/similar then in ARMA)

Real model:

...

I honestly dont understand you sometimes, its almost as if you're looking to pick out EVERY minor fault in the game, before you even have it

The variant in ArmA is a T-72M, quite probably modeled on a Czech built variation, which would explain the slightly higher peak of the frontal glacis slope.

The slope its self (on the model) is ~1.5m long, and slopes at 25 degrees from the horizontal. The hull depth being ~1m at the peak of the glacis plate to the base of the hull.

Now, if the stats-lovers can find the relative stats to match this on the internets or in books etc, then I believe we have case closed.

[bravo 6 0]

Now, if the stats-lovers can find the relative stats to match this on the internets or in books etc, then I believe we have case closed.

yup i agree, i really hope they can

lets wait and see the match

[MAA 127]

I think that shape of T-72 is good enough:

pic of Czechoslovak T-72

[Ukraineboy 0]

T 72, compair the front part that have some elevation:

ARMA model:

...

(even in OFP the T72 look better/similar then in ARMA)

Real model:

...

I honestly dont understand you sometimes, its almost as if you're looking to pick out EVERY minor fault in the game, before you even have it

The variant in ArmA is a T-72M, quite probably modeled on a Czech built variation, which would explain the slightly higher peak of the frontal glacis slope.

The slope its self (on the model) is ~1.5m long, and slopes at 25 degrees from the horizontal. The hull depth being ~1m at the peak of the glacis plate to the base of the hull.

Now, if the stats-lovers can find the relative stats to match this on the internets or in books etc, then I believe we have case closed.

Also to back up your point on it being a Czech variant, the Czechs exported a lot of T-72s to the world and Northern Sahrani would most likely have that model of the tank anyways.

[coderdfox 0]

OH no is this going to be the finger all over again?

[chipper 0]

I AINT BYING AA UNTILL TEH GAEM DEVILOPERS FICKS TAT DAYUM TANCK!!!11!!!

[TrevorOfCrete 0]

I AINT BYING AA UNTILL TEH GAEM DEVILOPERS FICKS TAT DAYUM TANCK!!!11!!!

i hope your being sarcastic.

[Correction 0]

I AINT BYING AA UNTILL TEH GAEM DEVILOPERS FICKS TAT DAYUM TANCK!!!11!!!

i hope your being sarcastic.

And I hope you're being sarcastic!

[Trueman 0]

I AINT BYING AA UNTILL TEH GAEM DEVILOPERS FICKS TAT DAYUM TANCK!!!11!!!

i hope your being sarcastic.

And I hope you're being sarcastic!

We all are!!!!

[llauma 0]

And let's not spam the thread..  Nitpicking is for God and small children.

The models are very accurate for a game. I understand that you might complain if they mount a minigun on the T72's but luckily it's nothing like that.

[TrevorOfCrete 0]

i hope we get some new screens from somwhere soon.

[sirex 0]

i hope we can make our own screens soon, know what i mean.

[bravo 6 0]

in 5 or 6 days we might have new screens.

[Spoock 3]

in 5 or 6 days we might have new screens.

or demO?

[Colossus 2]

Doubt it..

[Adamicz 3]

A gameplay vid from newest build would be enough for me Really hope, there won't be GC build

[sniper pilot 36]

A gameplay vid from newest build would be enough for me Really hope, there won't be GC build

I second that