CsonkaPityu 0 Posted April 14, 2006 There's a hill blocking your view in that pick, it doesn't reach the "edge" of the field of view. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Makivelli 0 Posted April 14, 2006 Oh my lord, I was expecting some minor visual tweaks etc to keep us going till game 2 and I was totally happy with that, but that is just amazing it looks like a totally new game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
txalin 2 Posted April 14, 2006 mmmm, first question to start the discussion Looks like the vegetation in general doesn't have any shadow, even in the screenshot of the tanks, where the tree has his own shadow, the bush below it hasn't got it, what do you think about that?, could be very nice and reallistic that the bushes also have their own shadows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bravo 6 0 Posted April 14, 2006 mmmm, first question to start the discussion Looks like the vegetation in general haven't any shadow, even in the screenshot of the tanks, where the tree has his own shadow, the bush below it haven't got it, what do you think about that?, could be very nice and reallistic that the bushes also have their own shadows. yup.. maybe they want to add dynamic trees and how they can be destroyed. (like the uprooting trees) don't you think? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakerod 254 Posted April 14, 2006 Armed Assault.com Check out the view distance in the middle of the page. That town behind the guy looks massive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Makivelli 0 Posted April 14, 2006 mmmm, first question to start the discussion Looks like the vegetation in general doesn't have any shadow, even in the screenshot of the tanks, where the tree has his own shadow, the bush below it hasn't got it, what do you think about that?, could be very nice and reallistic that the bushes also have their own shadows. I'd imagine small details like that would appear without question, however being small details they would be the lowest current priority in terms of visuals, do you want them to work on bush shadows or other things such as object and unit details? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Journeyman 0 Posted April 14, 2006 Oohh! ..The detail! Â ..And we have definitely got new soldier animations. ... No more bandy legs! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scrub 0 Posted April 14, 2006 *gets up off floor* ... *sets chair back up* !! BOOYA !!! -Now, keep in mind, these pics too may be from different stages of development. But HOLY CRAP are they beautiful!.- Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lendrom 0 Posted April 14, 2006 From the new screens we can see a few features. To sum them up: - beautiful water - high viewdistance - big city (but will the AI be able to navigate in it?) - great models including hands models (as noticed) - new standing animations (Placebo said somewhere that the animations will be added as one of the last things... so, does the fact that they are allready in mean something? ) - no sign of multiple gunner positions - some old models (garages for tanks, barells, pavement place for tree; are they placeholders too?) - some impressive trees and bushes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hekezu 0 Posted April 14, 2006 I almost moisted myself... Looks better than I expected. I guess Placebo was right about the "placeholders" . Looks like the animations have been tweaked/renewed a bit, atleast for idle stance: http://ofp.gamepark.cz/news/pics3/ArmA_hires_04.jpg The ocean looks more realistic than in many other games. http://ofp.gamepark.cz/news/pics3/ArmA_hires_02.jpg Hopefully it also reflects landscape/objects, but it isn't that important. Also the viewdistance in that picture seems to be pretty good. Can't wait for more videos and the demo! EDIT: Huh??? They changed the banner to the original one: http://www.armedassault.com/ I guess it is boring to see the same face on the front page in two different pictures. EDIT2: Now they changed it back and updated the screenshots.. aaargh! EDIT3: Now it is more artistic... I'm done editing... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakerod 254 Posted April 14, 2006 Anyone else think that there might be a reason why they hid the beach in the picture of the blackhawk flying over the water? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lwlooz 0 Posted April 14, 2006 Hey,this is looks fairly good.The textures and bumpmaps on that american soldier could need some rework(vest looks slightly odd),but besides that,I call it nice.Of course I will have to see if the sea is overly reflective(I.e the effect on the screen is there all the time in that strength). Oh and it would be nice if we could see a light-setting thats not "Full Strength sun",I would appreciate that . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sarge6754 0 Posted April 14, 2006 Arma Site Screen 1 Screen 2 Screen 3 Screen 4 WOW! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Colossus 2 Posted April 14, 2006 Jesus! Â Â Thank you Eastern bunny Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FatJoe 0 Posted April 14, 2006 It's christmas allready? These look awsome! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakerod 254 Posted April 14, 2006 Look at the latest screenshots thread that is pinned. There are actually 6 pictures we have been discussing them in there for a while. 6 Screenshots Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thunderbird 0 Posted April 14, 2006 ArmA visual aspect looks absolutely outstanding! Btw, The soviet camo here is totally unknown to me. It looks more to the current russian M21 Les. Anyways, I think that more enhancements would certainly be done, so no worries. Regards Thunderbird84 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sarge6754 0 Posted April 14, 2006 oops.. but thank you BIS!! We LOVE you! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Evishion 0 Posted April 14, 2006 i thought i was getting a heart attack when i saw these.. REAL impressive BIS .. keep up the good work! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakerod 254 Posted April 14, 2006 ArmA visual aspect looks absolutely outstanding!Btw, The soviet camo here is totally unknown to me. It looks more to the current russian M21 Les. Anyways, I think that more enhancements would certainly be done, so no worries. Regards Thunderbird84 If I remember correctly the OPFOR isn't supposed to be Russian which means they could be using another countries camo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bravo 6 0 Posted April 14, 2006 Anyone else think that there might be a reason why they hid the beach in the picture of the blackhawk flying over the water? they dont want us to see the beach.. must be amazing.. jesus.. the water is super realistic (so far). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
txalin 2 Posted April 14, 2006 btw, what is that strange thing that you can see on the right part of the pic? maybe a mistake? http://ofp.gamepark.cz/news/pics3/ArmA_hires_02.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hellfish6 7 Posted April 14, 2006 Its the interior of the Blackhawk, I think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ian Malcolm 0 Posted April 14, 2006 btw, what is that strange thing that you can see on the right part of the pic? maybe a mistake?http://ofp.gamepark.cz/news/pics3/ArmA_hires_02.jpg Seats inside seen thru window, lighted by opened doors on the other side? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lwlooz 0 Posted April 14, 2006 Seems to be the same shiny seats as seen in the Arma tech demo(Which was very very old remember ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
