Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
coderdfox

ArmA Photography

Recommended Posts

wow_o.gif

Great great xmas_o.gif .

The only things missing are some patches to correct some bugs and a Leopard1A5 and everything will be like a Bethooven symphony xmas_o.gif .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VDV on Sahrani

Just playing around with some textures

Sweet

I was hoping for something like this

Couple more I took on the fly. Don't have much time, because Raiders of the lost Ark is on TV today smile_o.gif

Inspired by a movie with Christian Bale which I haven't actually seen yet

us1fo5.jpg

us2as0.jpg

us3lc3.jpg

us4np0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you made a new map?

like in a CUSTOM map?

what tools did you use?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you made a new map?

like in a CUSTOM map?

what tools did you use?

I think he means mission... not island.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got some screenshots.

First one is edited with Photoshop. Enhanced colours and enhanced blur on top of the post processing.

Second one straight from ArmA.

Original pictures 1280x1024, high quality.

These are 800x640, 8/12 Image quality from Photoshop, JPG.

armaa2rz8.jpg

armaagd0.jpg

Enjoy.

System specs;

AMD Athlon 64 3800+ @ 2640 Mhz

4x512MB RAM DDR400 - 2-3-5-2-1T

ASUS 7600GT @ 595/1630

MSI K8N Neo4-F

- Viper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at the specs... I think 25-30 constant fps everywhere... *jealous*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have a closeup of what they're using for a unit patch? Also, I question the use of the marine style patrol cap, not that's it a big deal or anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sort of 30 FPS constant in towns, usually slightly above that.

In the deserts it's around 50-80 FPS. (Logically).

I've got a 19" screen, but I'm playing ArmA with 1024x768.

The resolution really has a huge FPS impact.

So does Postprocessing on High.

My settings;

Notice the Terrain Detail on Very Low.

That's because I accidentally deleted some file or folder in my Documents folder, can't turn it higher at the moment.

The setting didn't seem to alter my FPS anyway.

At least, not noticably.

settingsbg2.jpg

Clavicula, can you explain what you want to me, please ?

I could take a screenshot if you want.

- Viper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's me just screwing around with the number of units I can put on a map, this is really laggy here, 5 FPS :S:. Can anybody guess the number of tanks here?

hehesi6.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's me just screwing around with the number of units I can put on a map, this is really laggy here, 5 FPS :S:. Can anybody guess the number of tanks here?

721?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1260 TANKS?

Viper i have a a system which is AMD 4200 Dual Core with 3 gig same gfx what u think, it will be well playable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Matt Rochelle,

Yes, I think it'll be well-playable.

Anyway,

You can have 144 squads on one side.

The standard squad size is 9 men, so I put down 144 squads of 9 men. 1296 soldiers. Heh.

Extremely well playable. FPS of around 35.

Nah.

FPS of 0 - 1, heh.

Regarding the tanks .. I'm guessing about 751 tanks.

- Viper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The closest guess so far is from MAA3057. It's very close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In FACT There is 901 tanks..

Because there is a row of 18 tanks but 50 in each collum plus the once tank he is driving?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×