ralphwiggum 6 Posted April 30, 2006 Tov...no OFP? Â Airshow at March Air reserve base in CA Canadian Department of Homeland Security UH And the sign says... Airshow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supah 0 Posted April 30, 2006 Okay pictures Ralph, Too bad they had such a messy static display line, I am more for the fenced off kind photographically. Now you cant even take picture showing the entire plane without mom and pop in the frame. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
berghoff 11 Posted April 30, 2006 Little walk in forest: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
berghoff 11 Posted April 30, 2006 And last one : here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sole 0 Posted April 30, 2006 Intresting shot there MI_Fred and cheers supah Testing some aircraft photography at Schiphol Airport. Nothing too fancy though, just practicing a bit. Portrait Rotate! Throttling up! Screeeeeech! Pushback. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DBR_ONIX 0 Posted April 30, 2006 I like the first one First glance, scrolling up though the pictures it didn't seem that impressive, then I scrolled up a bit to show the top/other plane What sort of lens is that with? Just a standard-ish one, or proper telephoto one? - Ben Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sole 0 Posted April 30, 2006 I like the first one First glance, scrolling up though the pictures it didn't seem that impressive, then I scrolled up a bit to show the top/other plane What sort of lens is that with? Just a standard-ish one, or proper telephoto one? - Ben Cheers. As I said, wasn't meant to be fancy, as I was just a practice day. I wanted to get some more experience for when it really counts (airshows etc). I'm still fairly new to dSLR photography, I only recently switched to a proper camera. The lens I used was a Sigma APO 70-300 Macro DG. Excellent value for the money. I picked up mine for € 215,-. (comes with hood + bag). The non-APO lens is about € 145,- as far as I remember. Same lens I used for the wristwatch pic by the way. The Macro switch allows you to focus on subjects from ~95cm (200-300mm range), rather than the ~1.5m on normal mode. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tigershark_BAS 0 Posted May 2, 2006 Hey guys, I recall a conversation once in this thread regarding in-camera effects editing vs. external processing/editing. Found this the other day. It's a discussion of JPG vs. RAW shooting. Makes for an interesting read and he does bring up some good points. Enjoy. RAW vs JPG Article Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blackdog~ 0 Posted May 3, 2006 http://www.surfacezero.com/span/paino.gif Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HOBOMAN 0 Posted May 5, 2006 Picture I took at ground zero in NY (the writing in the bottom is a stamp I put on the picture) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DBR_ONIX 0 Posted May 5, 2006 Blackdog~ and HOBOMAN, both really nice pictures A quick question to anyone who knows anyhting about the lensbaby lesnes.. Is there any big differences between the original, and the new one? Looking at the site, the only difference I can see is that the V2 has F2 (as oposed to F2.6, which isn't worth the almost double in price IMO) - Ben Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoOB 0 Posted May 6, 2006 First off, the 2.0 has a faster way of changing aperatures. Just drop a little disc inside the lens and it hangs there until you pull it out and put a new one in. Second, the 2.0 has two glass elements, both are optically coated. On the original there's only one uncoated piece of glass. Resulting in some cool CA and other effects which you don't get with the 2.0. On the other hand, using the 8.0 aperature on the 2.0 I get a focuspoint that is almost as sharp as my 50mm prime, which speaks for the quality of the glass. Enough rambling, I say go for the original Lensbaby. It'll get you more blur for your money. And if you have enough money for the 2.0, get the original with the wideangle converter :P Skater, shot this friday with the Lensbaby 2.0 @ f/5.6 Another skater, also shot this friday with the 2.0 @ f/5.6 EDIT: Kickass shot HOBOMAN! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
killagee 0 Posted May 7, 2006 I Finally have my website online!!! StereoImage Check it out and give me some feed back please! How do i make an image in my signature that is also a link to my site? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Messiah 2 Posted May 7, 2006 the end tags should read [\img] and [\url] (reverse the \ though) but unfortunatly these forums dont seem to like very long strings of text in a signature, so its likely it wont work unless your image link is alot shorter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphwiggum 6 Posted May 7, 2006 <s>Here's my gift to you Chris. I fixed it for ya. </s> <s>oh and typing [url/] is not correct </s> <s>HEY! NO OFP REFERENCE ON YOUR WEBSITE!!!!! PERM BAN!!!! </s> oops... <table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Code Sample </td></tr><tr><td id="CODE"> <img src=*insert jpg file url here* border=0 > Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supah 0 Posted May 7, 2006 Hey Chris! I really like your site and your photography is as always very strong. You are blessed with a very beautifull country! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pathy 0 Posted May 7, 2006 Goob i really like that first picture, its very good, like something you'd see in a (good quality) magazine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
raedor 8 Posted May 7, 2006 I Finally have my website online!!!StereoImage Check it out and give me some feed back please! Wow! What can I say more? Samos or some other island in the west of Turkey: 1.5MB Version And here some variations: 1.8MB, 1.4MB and 1.2MB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shashman 0 Posted May 8, 2006 Some pictures I took of 'urban life' in Brussels. Sorry for the poor quality, I had to scan them and nobody likes jpeg compression All taken with my Canon EOS 3000V with standard 28-90mm lens and processed by me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DBR_ONIX 0 Posted May 8, 2006 Don't appologize for the "Poor quality", say their supposed to be like that They look really good, if they were perfectly sharp, I don't think they would have been as good - Ben Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shashman 0 Posted May 8, 2006 Don't appologize for the "Poor quality", say their supposed to be like that They look really good, if they were perfectly sharp, I don't think they would have been as good - Ben Heh, thanks The actual photos are sharp, it's just the evil jpeg compression Here are some more: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y217/Shashman/14A_0008.jpg http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y217/Shashman/32Aimproved.jpg http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y217/Shashman/13A_0007.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
killagee 0 Posted May 10, 2006 Nice pics Sashman. You make Brussels look like a warzone! Heres the total opposite then... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
