bars91 956 Posted June 27, 2016 So is BIS ViV going to be done with or without door anims? I.e. vehicle parks in the designated "load in" area > door opens, vehicle stays put > door anim ends, vehicle is teleported inside > door close anim commences? Pretty much like sometime ago BI wanted to do get-in for inf. (and what RHS, VTN etc does actually do pretty well) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcae2798 132 Posted June 28, 2016 Sorry guys, searched the thread, and your site, but no luck. Are there plans and/or ETA on Takistan style civilians? Appreciate all you do. Thanks! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chairborne 2594 Posted June 28, 2016 So is BIS ViV going to be done with or without door anims? I.e. vehicle parks in the designated "load in" area > door opens, vehicle stays put > door anim ends, vehicle is teleported inside > door close anim commences? Pretty much like sometime ago BI wanted to do get-in for inf. (and what RHS, VTN etc does actually do pretty well) Last i checked the open/close door anims were not supported for vehicle in vehicle, if they support it then we'll make use of it. Sorry guys, searched the thread, and your site, but no luck. Are there plans and/or ETA on Takistan style civilians? Appreciate all you do. Thanks! Not yet. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alwarren 2767 Posted June 28, 2016 Sorry guys, searched the thread, and your site, but no luck. Are there plans and/or ETA on Takistan style civilians? Appreciate all you do. Thanks! Plans yes, ETA noSend from my tablet, so pardon any autocorrect bollocks 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bars91 956 Posted June 28, 2016 Last i checked the open/close door anims were not supported for vehicle in vehicle, if they support it then we'll make use of it. So I thought as well. Just wanted to find out for sure! ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jacobc679 11 Posted June 29, 2016 Anybody else having the bug on Cherno where the terrain is white? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jacobc679 11 Posted June 30, 2016 Wrong thread. then where do i post it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CrazyCorky 463 Posted June 30, 2016 then where do i post it? Cup Terrains thread. There is one! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alwarren 2767 Posted June 30, 2016 Anybody else having the bug on Cherno where the terrain is white? Only in winter.... (and Winter is coming) Seriously though, this is the place to ask that. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zagor64bz 1225 Posted June 30, 2016 Only in winter.... (and Winter is coming) Is this what I think it is? Cherno winter in the pack? :D :D :D 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alwarren 2767 Posted June 30, 2016 Is this what I think it is? Cherno winter in the pack? :D :D :DLOL no this was just a ASoIaF reference :)Send from my tablet, so pardon any autocorrect bollocks 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zagor64bz 1225 Posted June 30, 2016 LOL no this was just a ASoIaF reference :) Send from my tablet, so pardon any autocorrect bollocks LOL..damn you...I got all excited for nothing..hahahahahaha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stormforge 37 Posted July 1, 2016 What is the difference in the CUP AH-64 and the RHS AH-64? Not talking models or anything. I ask because I was messing around the Hunter Six mission by Lato converting it to one or the other to test them both out. With the RHS AH-64 it would engage any targets Laser Spotted judiciously with Hellfires even outside visual range, and the CUP AH-64 had to be almost on top of it and used the cannon much more than the Hellfires. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hcpookie 3770 Posted July 1, 2016 That could be 1,001 things. What you describe I assume is AI behavior. Possibly the irscanrange values on one or the other have been altered. We did some testing w/ rangemaster values and they definitely made a difference in A2. We found there was a trade-off between the AI knowing about far-away targets and the time it took for the AI to recognize the targets. We assumed !!! that the list of targets to process was so large that it took longer for the AI to process the list of targets vs. a lower scanrange. "somewhere in the middle" was best for our purposes. YMMV of course and who knows how it changed in A3. But that's a complete guess on my part! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stormforge 37 Posted July 1, 2016 Yes this is from an AI controlled Apache. The RHS one spends missiles like crazy even on infantry from far out, while the CUP one only used a single missile on a truck, cannon on everything else all close range. Both were up against multiple armed offroad trucks and infantry in different locations, w/4 quad racks of Hellfires each Apache. Edit: Ok, I took both for a spin and that does seem to be the difference. In the RHS Apache the AI teammate was calling out targets much sooner. Thanks for the reply. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chairborne 2594 Posted July 1, 2016 Off the top of my head that can be either because they use a much bigger radius for radar (which is not necessarily a good thing...) or the AI skill is set higher. I don't play with RHS though so i can't tell for sure, last time i tested our apache it seemed to behave normally. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hcpookie 3770 Posted July 1, 2016 Well edit to my edit - just speculation, can't say it is or is not. The comparison is speculation. My past experience w/ the rangemaster tests were made as a result of why does the AI never target... we determined that the large irscanrange isn't necessarily a good thing... took FOREVER for AI to call out targets. We redid the vehicles (one of the choppers) w/ a much lower irscanrange and suddenly AI were calling out targets in a "timely" fashion. BUT all that was A2... again, haven't made the same test in A3 so "maybe, maybe not". Since so much has changed in A3 the larger irscanrange values may actually work. Just an interesting discussion to have at this point! :) 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stormforge 37 Posted July 1, 2016 To better understand what I was talking about I took a couple of videos below. Also to explain a bit more the AI helicopter is not under my control or part of my team. It is controlled through a script that forces it into combat mode and moves it to chosen location or returns it to base. Trying to understand the different behaviors as a hopefully upcoming mission maker. The RHS Apache was farther back and I had to move the CUP Apache up in order to get it to fire. Disregard the first missile fired in the RHS video. Was being impatient and was about to move the chopper and shut off the laser. CUP AH-64 RHS AH-64 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chairborne 2594 Posted July 2, 2016 MH-6 Littlebirds now support fastrope as well: 10 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ineptaphid 6413 Posted July 2, 2016 MH-6 Littlebirds now support fastrope as well: Looking good :) I haven't tried the fast roping at all-can you order ai team mates to use the rope? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chairborne 2594 Posted July 2, 2016 Forgot an important detail, that is ACE fastrope (although we're working on our own standalone alternative). :) 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chairborne 2594 Posted July 2, 2016 We have begun testing the new Vehicle In Vehicle tech from Apex: 12 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jnr4817 215 Posted July 2, 2016 Not sure if you have seen Duda's rappelling on this forum, but it is the most realistic and easy to use system, I've played with so far. Works on any aircraft. https://forums.bistudio.com/topic/192126-advanced-rappelling/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
