maddogx 13 Posted August 13, 2011 I see. Well, in this case, Iranians appears to have really diversified equipment. That's true in any case. Or how would you explain the Israeli-looking vehicles? ;) I'm still thinking knock-offs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Black Cat 10 Posted August 13, 2011 Maybe the Mi-48 is a unlicensed Mi-28? The Iranians produced both the AH-1J and the UH-1N unlicensed with extensive modifications as the Panha 2091 and 2096, I believe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ArmAriffic 10 Posted August 13, 2011 (edited) Maybe the Mi-48 is a unlicensed Mi-28? The Iranians produced both the AH-1J and the UH-1N unlicensed with extensive modifications as the Panha 2091 and 2096, I believe. Mi-48 Mi-28 the Mi-48 is made up by BIS Edited August 13, 2011 by ArmAriffic a pic pissed off my virus scanner Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Black Cat 10 Posted August 13, 2011 I know, but maybe in the Armaverse it's an unlicensed "Upgrade" of the Mi-28. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cescollino 10 Posted August 13, 2011 in arma 3 would be nice to have the drones without soldier inside them -_- Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gorror 10 Posted August 13, 2011 Those pc requirements are the minimums or the recomanded ones? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maio 293 Posted August 13, 2011 Those pc requirements are the minimums or the recomanded ones? We don't know yet :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PuFu 4600 Posted August 13, 2011 Those pc requirements are the minimums or the recomanded ones? afaik those are minimum. Bear in mind that BIS have set them as high as they have in order to minimize the "omg...i got a phantas7ic rig - p4 512 ram, on board gfx card and your game iz not workin!" type of comments. That doesn't mean the game will not work on lower specs, but the experience might not be the optimum one Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frostwyrm333 1 Posted August 13, 2011 one more thing about animations, if characters are visibly breathing, doesnt it mean that animation system was improved to support such stuff? From what I understand about current anim. system it would be insane to try something like this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
purepassion 22 Posted August 13, 2011 yes you are correct with that. There are now even new properties meaning things like fingers are now also animated Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DetCord 96 Posted August 13, 2011 (edited) Anyone else notice the kinetic energy gun system? Edited August 13, 2011 by DetCord Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steakslim 1 Posted August 13, 2011 ....sure are a bit slow there DevilDog, also you need to change that image into a URL link, it's too big to post in the forum, see rules. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DetCord 96 Posted August 13, 2011 (edited) ....sure are a bit slow there DevilDog, also you need to change that image into a URL link, it's too big to post in the forum, see rules. I've been in the field for a brigade FTX prepping for another deployment to the 'Stan. Excuse my tardiness. :j: Edited August 13, 2011 by DetCord Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steakslim 1 Posted August 13, 2011 I've been in the field for a brigade FTX prepping for another deployment to the "Stan. Excuse my tardiness. :j: Oh no problem, and nothing ment by it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
instagoat 133 Posted August 13, 2011 Anyone else notice the kinetic energy gun system? Railgun tanks, yes. Hopefully modelled with realistic punch. I already love them, even though these are just as fictional as the MI-48 helo, it´s feasible technology, and war-driven development always has been faster paced than peacetime development anyway. These will probably be seen very rarely, and if you see them, you´ll probably want to either get rid of them quick, or stay out of their sight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DetCord 96 Posted August 13, 2011 Railgun tanks, yes. Hopefully modelled with realistic punch. I already love them, even though these are just as fictional as the MI-48 helo, it´s feasible technology, and war-driven development always has been faster paced than peacetime development anyway.These will probably be seen very rarely, and if you see them, you´ll probably want to either get rid of them quick, or stay out of their sight. Mmm... I'll repost what I posted at armaholic. I mean shit, ArmA 3 depicts small arms weapons that have a cased ammo system, but at the same time kinetic energy weapons are widely available.... that just doesn't jive. They really need to do a hell of a lot more research. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CameronMcDonald 146 Posted August 13, 2011 I mean shit, ArmA 3 depicts small arms weapons that have a cased ammo system, but at the same time kinetic energy weapons are widely available.... that just doesn't jive. They really need to do a hell of a lot more research. They won't be widely available, that's the thing. The tank with the novel weapon is likely to be a prototype in the main campaign, i.e. the only example in the world. It won't be every man and his Big Dog (*shudders*) running around with one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CarlGustaffa 4 Posted August 14, 2011 Yeah I hope they have that tank with conventional weapons too. The rail gun version is a nice mission objective, but don't think I'll be using it for much else. Pretty much like todays rocket artillery, which I find too effective, and of course the Scud. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steakslim 1 Posted August 14, 2011 Yeah I hope they have that tank with conventional weapons too. The rail gun version is a nice mission objective, but don't think I'll be using it for much else. Pretty much like todays rocket artillery, which I find too effective, and of course the Scud. Judging from all the previous screenshots of tanks, i'm sure we'll have conventional Merkava tanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rye1 21 Posted August 14, 2011 Yeah I hope they have that tank with conventional weapons too. The rail gun version is a nice mission objective, but don't think I'll be using it for much else. Pretty much like todays rocket artillery, which I find too effective, and of course the Scud. If not... how do you defeat the might nuclear railgun tank? By way of nuclear mine of course! http://www.blurbwire.com/topics/Medium_Atomic_Demolition_Munition http://www.blurbwire.com/topics/Blue_Peacock :p Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CarlGustaffa 4 Posted August 14, 2011 I think Thermite would still work pretty ok though :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paecmaker 23 Posted August 15, 2011 (edited) On my facebook page Arma 3 just realesed 4 underwater pics, one of those pics had a weapon that I havent seen in the game before, but I couldnt show the pics here. Edited August 15, 2011 by paecmaker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
roberthammer 582 Posted August 15, 2011 On my facebook page Arma 3 just realesed 4 underwater pics, one of those pics had a weapon that I havent seen in the game before, but I couldnt show the pics here. http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=223939467652791&set=a.223939424319462.51831.192181357495269&type=1&theater mean this? That's silenced version of CZ SCORPION EVO 3 A1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paecmaker 23 Posted August 15, 2011 http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=223939467652791&set=a.223939424319462.51831.192181357495269&type=1&theater mean this?That's silenced version of CZ SCORPION EVO 3 A1 yeah that was it, I thought that the scorpion was a much smaller weapon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zukov 490 Posted August 15, 2011 future lynx? http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/1843/pcgamersept2011arma31.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
