Sovietzug 0 Posted May 20, 2005 I have a dude now OFP2 will be about 1970's wars or eeuu imperialism of 2010 ? I prefer 70's conflicts to play as comanche vs hokum with the OFP infantery Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
simulacra 0 Posted May 20, 2005 Yea, really fun to drive around in jeeps and fight with m16a1, or not. 2010 rocks 1970 any day... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NKVD 0 Posted May 20, 2005 look if you prefer 70s go play numerous shooters which already've been made in last 6 months...all of them turned out to be a total crap...jeezus..do we need any more of that ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EiZei 0 Posted May 20, 2005 Bah, does'nt matter as long as it is NOT WW2 or Vietnam. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kerosene 0 Posted May 20, 2005 I prefer 2010 because it will be a lot better if BIS design a game that incorporates all the modern ideas and concepts in war, and modmakers work backwards than if BIS make a game set in the 70's and mod makers have to fight the game engine when they try and make somethng new. It's too late anyway, they already announced its 2010. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Evishion 0 Posted May 20, 2005 i hoped it would be around 2005.. in actual time.. but i dont really care.. i like 2010 more than 70... waaay to many games based on wwii/nam these days, so its good that some games goes modern Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fork122 0 Posted May 20, 2005 OFP2 will be about 1970's wars or eeuu imperialism of 2010 ? Quoting the Operation Flashpoint 2 press release. Quote[/b] ]The year is 2010 and the world has changed. So it's 2010, which personally I prefer over another Cold War era game. I just hope the XM8 isn't in the game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Charon-VW:BB- 0 Posted May 20, 2005 Yeah no vietnam .... that would be cool Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cpt. FrostBite 0 Posted May 20, 2005 I love the 2010 scenario. Although I would have liked a NAM-game aswell. But as long as they'll support two gunners in a chopper I'm happy and than we'll just create our own NAM addons. They probably choose the 2010 screnario, because Earl already had an M249 and M16A4 model (old-timers know what I'm talking about) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EiZei 0 Posted May 20, 2005 By the time OFP2 will be released 2010 military operations will probably be a trip down the nostalgic lane. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gollum1 0 Posted May 20, 2005 Bah, does'nt matter as long as it is NOT WW2 or Vietnam. Amen. I think 2010 is a fine year to set it in, I just hope they don't make all the equipment super modern, sparkling new high-speed Å°bar Special Delta Rainbow shit. We have crap like Battlefield 2 for that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ebns72 0 Posted May 20, 2005 i just hope ofp isn't ghost recon. I would have actually prefered like 1979 or something, there are too many futuristic war shooters coming out, I want to see some gold old cold war. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heatseeker 0 Posted May 20, 2005 I think 2010 is good for me, not too old, not too futuristic and with enough room for a fictional conflict, im curious has from where will the enemy forces be, Asia? Speculation begins . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Antichrist 0 Posted May 20, 2005 Quote[/b] ]The year is 2010 and the world has changed. OMG. I didn't seee that one before. So does that mean that we won't see any fighting? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Postduifje 0 Posted May 20, 2005 2010 sounds really futuristic and lame at start, but when you think about it, in late 2006 it's just far away enough to be in the 'near unknown' so it's just perfect. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gandalf the white 0 Posted May 20, 2005 Imo it's better, Today's vehicles... UAV's, AC-130's, the Huey, they'll all be reason to break limits (in thesame order: monitors, rotatable guns on planes, multi gun positions) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ex-RoNiN 0 Posted May 20, 2005 look if you prefer 70s go play numerous shooters which already've been made in last 6 months...all of them turned out to be a total crap...jeezus..do we need any more of that ? Your aggressive attitude is totally uncalled for. Nothing he said deserves the kind of response you provided. I suggest you read the board rules carefully before you post again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EiZei 0 Posted May 20, 2005 Imo it's better, Today's vehicles... UAV's, AC-130's, the Huey, they'll all be reason to break limits (in thesame order: monitors, rotatable guns on planes, multi gun positions) You know that planes similar to AC-130 existed in the 1960s right? And as for UAVs.. I suggest that you check out FDFMOD. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Antichrist 0 Posted May 20, 2005 I also rather see 2010 than 1970. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cozza 24 Posted May 21, 2005 and if people dont like it. mod it. I think 2010 is a great place, not to far ahead but still got todays battle tactics. I hope those russians have something to do with guba Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heatseeker 0 Posted May 21, 2005 I hope those russians have something to do with guba  Yes they do, they are russians too . 35 years later Guba's skeleton was found in the sea at the east coast of Kolgujev (thats where i dumped him from the hind helicopter while heading for the scud) . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4 IN 1 0 Posted May 21, 2005 whatever, as there's always be addon makers to make what is lacked in it(thank you addon makers ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Evishion 0 Posted May 21, 2005 I hope those russians have something to do with guba  Yes they do, they are russians too . Yea.. i kinda like that they use russians again becasuse in all other games they ALL use the standard.. US vs something_every_game_does So im glad for that BIS still will keep on the russians and not the other standard countrys.. but hey. its 3 different places and enemys here to.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mattxr 9 Posted May 21, 2005 It might not just be the US Forces.. its a international coalition contingent which might have others in it to which would be cool.. but theres always american forces in games.. why cant there be UK forces or NATO or something? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D.murphy man 0 Posted May 21, 2005 Because it sells better in the US if the game has US forces in. Same goes for movies, most of the time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites