Inkompetent 0 Posted March 23, 2011 http://www.arma2.com/beta-patch.php No listed changes, but hearsay says it is a stability fix. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dwarden 1124 Posted March 23, 2011 yes, i heard rumor that some crash bug was slaughtered in background ... :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Taxman 10 Posted March 23, 2011 yes, i heard rumor that some crash bug was slaughtered in background ... :) Gonna report you on humanitarian grounds,,, Bugs have feelings you know... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rubberkite 19 Posted March 23, 2011 always good to hear that bugs are solved.... I suppose that those beta will be part of final 1.59. I also can't wait to see the final release working, and also respective linux and win dedi server. Seems that this will be really a "BIG" step ahead from 1.57 in many aspect of the game. thank you to BIS and for people that work togheter reporting problems and testing stuff for free. :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cjph 0 Posted March 23, 2011 Good news - had my first CTD for ages with the last beta. Thanks BIS. cj Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dwarden 1124 Posted March 23, 2011 Good news - had my first CTD for ages with the last beta. Thanks BIS.cj with this or previous ? and where are my dump? :eek: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lazerath 10 Posted March 23, 2011 I sent you a dump last week and I never got a reply from sending it. Is that normal? or should I have resent the info to you again Dwarden? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ProfTournesol 956 Posted March 23, 2011 Good news - had my first CTD for ages with the last beta. Thanks BIS.cj How hard is it to understand that beta are here ONLY for debugging purpose :mad: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maddogx 13 Posted March 23, 2011 How hard is it to understand that beta are here ONLY for debugging purpose :mad: How hard is it to remain civil on these forums? All he said was that he's happy the new beta fixes a crash opportunity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dwarden 1124 Posted March 23, 2011 I sent you a dump last week and I never got a reply from sending it. Is that normal? or should I have resent the info to you again Dwarden? i usualy not answer the [Crash] subject emails cause i got quite lot of them ... i answer only bogus ones where someone sent me useless or obsolete data ... ofcourse if the issue still happening then it's better You sent me newer build based crashdumps+rpt ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ProfTournesol 956 Posted March 23, 2011 How hard is it to remain civil on these forums? All he said was that he's happy the new beta fixes a crash opportunity. I'm afraid you should re read his post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
duckmeister 10 Posted March 23, 2011 I'm afraid you should re read his post. In his post, he claims that he is glad that BIS fixed a crash that was the previous beta. That's it. Why did you blow up on him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ProfTournesol 956 Posted March 23, 2011 In his post, he claims that he is glad that BIS fixed a crash that was the previous beta. That's it.Why did you blow up on him? Ok ok, i'm sorry, i must have misunderstood his post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
duckmeister 10 Posted March 23, 2011 Ok ok, i'm sorry, i must have misunderstood his post. Oh I see, a friend of mine read the post and thought that he was being sarcastic as if to say "Gee, thanks BIS for giving me a CTD", instead of a sincere "Thanks BIS for fixing the CTD". That's totally understandable. Funny how frequent miscommunication occurs in text, with no way to determine tone or body language. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sickboy 13 Posted March 23, 2011 Oh I see, a friend of mine read the post and thought that he was being sarcastic as if to say "Gee, thanks BIS for giving me a CTD", instead of a sincere "Thanks BIS for fixing the CTD". That's totally understandable.Funny how frequent miscommunication occurs in text, with no way to determine tone or body language. I'm also reading it as the former, "tnx for giving me a CTD", unable to figure out how people would read it as the latter :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SWAT_BigBear 0 Posted March 23, 2011 Heck, I thought he was just confirming the last beta caused a CTD for him "1st in ages"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coffeecat 10 Posted March 23, 2011 Question about AI and formations: I put a AI Squad with me as member in the Editor, give them a WP with: Engage at Will, Wakeful, Formation V, normal speed and they dont keep in formation. they allways walking in a column, never the formation i choose at the WP?! im pretty sure they did before some betas! new bug? if not its really stupid;-( Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CarlGustaffa 4 Posted March 23, 2011 and where are my dump? :eek: Not to be used as a pickup line :D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cjph 0 Posted March 23, 2011 Heck, I thought he was just confirming the last beta caused a CTD for him "1st in ages"? Correct m8 - 79122 caused my first crash in a long long time last night, and when I logged on today I see another beta fixing a crash problem. So I meant to thank BIS for the unbelievable quick response with 79224, ie the fix was good news. No sarcasm, just genuine gratitude for the support the team give. @Dwarden, was late last night and I guess this fix has solved it. cjph Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PeterBitt 10 Posted March 23, 2011 (edited) uhm i might be wrong because iam no it-specialist, but i get virus warning everytime i show the last two pages of this thread! something to do with danilas post?? three posts and only stupid stuff??! edit: praise microsoft security essentials!! Edited March 23, 2011 by PeterBitt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AZCoder 921 Posted March 24, 2011 I have been getting this scripting error for probably the last month or two when running the beta patches. I thought it was an addon, but I traced it to line 605 of healer.sqf in the First Aid module. Error: _healer removeEventHandler ["animStateChanged", > Error position: <removeEventHandler ["animStateChanged", > Error Type Any, expected Number I run Battlefield Clearance and Simulation with this in their inits: this synchronizeObjectsAdd allUnits; The error occurs usually once per mission after some random amount of time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolffy.au 9 Posted March 24, 2011 The error occurs usually once per mission after some random amount of time. Multiple missions or the same mission? Can we get a look at the mission to try and reproduce it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AZCoder 921 Posted March 24, 2011 It's 8 different missions in my campaign, which I plan to release in 2 to 3 days. I always run with showscripterrors, so I see these things, and just got around to researching it. There was a ticket for this very error in CIT in 2009 that was resolved, and I had not seen it happen until the past few weeks. http://dev-heaven.net/issues/3468 It does not appear to be 100% the same, but related nonetheless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DAP 619 Posted March 24, 2011 (edited) I found small bug in latest beta Here: ARMA 2 CO 1.57 + build 79224 Edited March 24, 2011 by DAP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fabrizio_t 58 Posted March 24, 2011 Question about AI and formations:I put a AI Squad with me as member in the Editor, give them a WP with: Engage at Will, Wakeful, Formation V, normal speed and they dont keep in formation. they allways walking in a column, never the formation i choose at the WP?! im pretty sure they did before some betas! new bug? if not its really stupid;-( Wakeful? Do you mean aware? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
