Jump to content

TheMasterofBlubb

Member
  • Content Count

    59
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Community Reputation

10 Good

About TheMasterofBlubb

  • Rank
    Lance Corporal

Recent Profile Visitors

852 profile views
  1. Can you tell us the new values? Source: dedmen on discord
  2. @Perat OFP im not sure what yoou actually mean (probably lost in translation). The limitFPS Parameter is a startparameter for the server it self, so the server owner needs to set that, the client cant and dont need to do anything else
  3. Hit me up in PM and we can discuss further, this specific thread is meant for stuff related to the special builds. I can help you figuring out what you guys need.
  4. @VulturARG from what i experienced something like a i7 6700/k or R5 2400 could do the job pretty well, mostly it depends on what your mission is doing in the background (scripts mods etc). BUT and here comes the biggest problem you guys might encounter, virtual cores are not the same as physical cores in terms of RAW performance, somtimes it can get worse if some other user on the same physical computer does some heavy stuff (it depends on how the sheduler of the VM-Host is working). In general i figured out its in the long term easier AND cheaper to get some good dedicated server and set it up on your own (yes i know that takes some time, but its really worth as its not at all comparable to what you can get from some gamehosters, like nitrado, for the same price, regardless of the actual game running) To reference the current server i manage, is a 60Player PVP one, its a intel i7 4790k (4GHz) with 30GB of RAM in a VM (but the only VM on that PC, mostly for some extra features) we run 2 servers with each getting 2 physical and 2 logical cores and additionally some (like 5 or 6) tools around that for management and logging. The mission and configs are pretty optimized and almost no AI. We get (thx to some really nice tutorials and documentations from dedmen) about 80-100FPS with one server full. If you plan on having a lot of AI, definetly use Headless Clients, my last test on that is 2or 3 years ago, Liberation with 1 Server and 3 HC on a i7 6700k with 64GB RAM, was at around 1500 AI (most in groups) at stable 50fps
  5. TheMasterofBlubb

    ASM.exe

    Just a small thing to note, as i had not changed the Monitor Application it self the RAm usage is still 32bit so it can show something like 180MB usage thats due to the fact that it goes to 0 after 4096MB. If there is someone that can recreate the Graphs to look like freds, i happily would help to get the values needed.
  6. TheMasterofBlubb

    ASM.exe

    @Tankbuster there i think is some newer Monitor app, at least thats what i think when looking at some of the vast differences between the features of my Monitor app and the features of the linux port. But i included the App from somewhere earlier in this thread. It definetly works with that (just not the Net and Disk IO, if someone can help me there that would be a charm)
  7. TheMasterofBlubb

    ASM.exe

    im just passing by..... https://github.com/TheMasterofBlubb/ASM-Redux
  8. @Diveyez The perf build is without the profiling stuff, eventhough if i remember its just local logging possibilities(you know GDPR and Stuff)
  9. Interesting how come i had a MP server running modded liberation with ~700 active AI and 15 players. All running at 55 server fps and client side depending on the PC from 40 to 120fps?
  10. The problems in comlicated Engines always exist, just by beeing complicated. RV suffers from that Enfusion will too and other bigger complicated Engines will too. Its just a matter of time till they pop up.
  11. Thats cool that you fix the mods you use but what about the other 99.9% in use right now?
  12. @Diveyez no bias towards BI or anything else. Im not sure if you know what Arma runs on.. its a i think 14 years old engine (RV) that isnt even technically able to run Arma 3 and somehow it runs (not even bad if knowing the quirksin scripting and server administration). So the solution would be a new engine. There already is one in development, its called Enfusion (new in-house Engine). Pros: -Better Performance -Future Proof -New technologies like DX12 / Vulkan Cons: -mod compatibility??? (thats what Arma lives from) -new bugs and quirks ( this is present on any more compicated engine and Arma is heck of a lot more complicated than BF or CoD) -new scripting language , so probably Missions will not be compatible... So we have 2 options A) take what we have . And we got way better performance wise since the Alpha. I personally get stable FPS from 40 to 80FPS depending on the server and mods. I run a Ryzen R7 2700X (all core 4.1GHz) B) lose probably all our mods (many developers moved along, because they finished they work) and there is no one to update them (look what happened with APEX and the Map lighting). there is even 1 option i like the most: Make Arma 4 with the new Engine and make it backwards compatible like Arma 3 to Arma 2, even with performance cost. Thats a tough choice if you ask me, but as of what i play im ok with 40 to 80 fps (Arma is not that fast paced that you would need 200fps like in doom). PS: regarding someone will do it better and faster... someone would need the knowhow that BIS has and i mean not BI but BIS, because BI could ask BIS for help in many situations. Additionaly if there would be someone we would already have a Arma 2 competitor, the only thing we have is Squad, having no mod support and no scripting language at all. So if there is someone out there we like to see what they offer.
  13. @laxemann and @jokoho482 is there any way to get Dynasound and ES to work without CBA? I have problems with a change of direction CBA is going due to actual gameplay changes forced upon players. As an example: I want to host a server that allows your wonderfull mod as an optional one. What now happens is that people using this mod have a advantage over people not doing so.(for example they can load 100rnd Mags in to the MX rifles) So now we are in a position where we have to decide wether we force CBA on everyone regardless of need or remove your all optional CBA mods..
  14. TheMasterofBlubb

    General Discussion (dev branch)

    @mankyle my only number 1 for Arma 4 is NO PHYSX (by Nvidia)
  15. TheMasterofBlubb

    CBA - Community Base Addons - ARMA 3

    Ahhhh the Forum is trolling me. i could get out of the nametag sry for the Spam. What i wanted to write is that if CBA is enabled you can load a 100rnd mag in to a MX/M/C what shouldnt be possible and is not when using plain vanilla Arma
×