Devil Dogs SF 13 Posted June 21, 2010 Can anyone confirm if turning off PhysX Acceleration will boost performance on the 8800GT for sure? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maddogx 13 Posted June 21, 2010 Can anyone confirm if turning off PhysX Acceleration will boost performance on the 8800GT for sure? Why don't you just give it a try? Enabling/disabling PhysX is pretty simple. ;) It definitely doesn't make any difference with my GTX285, but I don't know about 8800GTs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Devil Dogs SF 13 Posted June 21, 2010 True, I'm just desperate for anything to improve Chernarus performance. It's playable but sometimes it just decides to crawl....:mad: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rexxenexx 0 Posted June 21, 2010 No difference -PhysX- for me on my GTX285 either. Pretty sure it's a placebo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Devil Dogs SF 13 Posted June 21, 2010 No FPS improvement on Chernarus after disabling PhysX Acceleration on an 8800GT. :'( Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dwarden 1125 Posted June 21, 2010 No FPS improvement on Chernarus after disabling PhysX Acceleration on an 8800GT. :'( it was old tweak if you using way newer drivers it most likely not work ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Devil Dogs SF 13 Posted June 21, 2010 Yeah, I'm using the newest drivers. Real shame it doesn't work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EDcase 87 Posted June 22, 2010 (edited) Haven't read all posts here but have you tried setting Nvidia Control Panel Max render ahead fames to 0. ...and make sure these lines are in your user.cfg file (in your profiles folder) GPU_MaxFramesAhead=0; GPU_DetectedFramesAhead=0; This helped my fps... One thing that really helps the smoothness is setting Texture detail to NORMAL. (It reduces the quality in the distance but closeup is the same as HIGH) Edited June 22, 2010 by EDcase Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Iroquois Pliskin 0 Posted June 22, 2010 Haven't read all posts here but have you tried setting Nvidia Control Panel Max render ahead fames to 0....and make sure these lines are in your user.cfg file (in your profiles folder) GPU_MaxFramesAhead=0; GPU_DetectedFramesAhead=0; This helped my fps... One thing that really helps the smoothness is setting Texture detail to NORMAL. (It reduces the quality in the distance but closeup is the same as HIGH) Do post your PC specs and the drivers you are running. The original post has it spot-on: TURN OFF VSYNC. Force VSync off in Nvidia Control Panel Arma 2 profile, since the game has it enabled be Default with no option to disable it in-game. In an area where you could be having 24 FPS w/out Vsync, you might be getting 30 FPS with it bouncing to 15 FPS and back. Likewise: if you're getting 30 to 45 FPS switches with Vsync on, you could be having stable/average 38 FPS +-2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrunoDerRabe 0 Posted June 28, 2010 (edited) ArmA2 Benchmark #1 Profi with these settings for both systems: 1920x1200 Sichtweite: 3876m Qualitätspräf.: Sehr hoch Menüauflösung: 1920x1200 3D Auflösung: 125% 2400x1500 Texturendetails: Sehr hoch Grafikspeicher: Voreinstellung Anisotrop. Filter: Hoch Antialiasing: Hoch Landsch. Details: Hoch Objektdetails: Sehr hoch Schattendetails: Sehr hoch Nachbearb.-Effekt: Deaktiviert Menügröße: Sehr klein Seitenver.: Breitbild 16:10 The settings are optimized to get the very best smooth high quality images in ArmA2 1.07 while playing the game on the following configurations. 257.21 WHQL Testsystem A: CPU: AMD PhenomII 940 4x3,0GHZ @ 3,0GHZ Memory: 8GB A-DATA DDR2-1066 Motherboard: Asrock K10N780SLIX3-WiFi Graphics Cards Manufacturer: Gainward Triple NVIDIA GPUs: 3 x NVIDIA GeForce 260 GTX Sound: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Hard Drive(s): 2 500GB Maxtor hard drives in stripe raid Notes: Cooler Master RealPower Pro 1250W, CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12P, Chieftec Bigtower, Windows 7 Ultimate 64 with patch 1.05: 20-21 FPS with patch 1.07: 26 FPS Testsystem B: CPU: AMD PhenomII 940 4x3,0GHZ @ 3,0GHZ Memory: 8GB A-DATA DDR2-1066 Motherboard: Asrock K10N780SLIX3-WiFi Graphics Cards Manufacturer: Point Of View and Gainward 2 NVIDIA GPUs: 1 x NVIDIA GeForce 470 GTX plus 1 x NVIDIA GeForce 260 GTX dedicated to physics Sound: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Hard Drive(s): 2 500GB Maxtor hard drives in stripe raid Notes: Cooler Master RealPower Pro 1250W, CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12P, Chieftec Bigtower, Windows 7 Ultimate 64 with patch 1.07: 28 FPS Edited June 28, 2010 by BrunoDerRabe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MavericK96 0 Posted June 29, 2010 Interesting that 3x GTX 260s aren't as fast as a 470 GTX. My guess is that the game is not utilizing 3-Way SLI very well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jpinard 10 Posted June 29, 2010 Interesting that 3x GTX 260s aren't as fast as a 470 GTX. My guess is that the game is not utilizing 3-Way SLI very well. Little does. 1 super card is almost always better than 2-4 medium cards in a game that's extremely cpu limited. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AnimalMother92 10 Posted June 29, 2010 6/29/10 New beta drivers available on nvidia's site. New in Release 258.69-Adds support for NVIDIA 3D Vision Surround technology. Learn more about this technology including the hardware and software requirements here. -Includes numerous bug fixes. Refer to the release notes on the documentation tab for information about the key bug fixes in this release. -Users without US English operating systems can select their language and download the International driver here. http://www.nvidia.com/object/win7-winvista-64bit-258.69-beta-driver.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrunoDerRabe 0 Posted June 29, 2010 Interesting that 3x GTX 260s aren't as fast as a 470 GTX. My guess is that the game is not utilizing 3-Way SLI very well. found it also very interesting, but please keep in mind some very important detail: 2 NVIDIA GPUs: 1 x NVIDIA GeForce 470 GTX plus 1 x NVIDIA GeForce 260 GTX dedicated to physics Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MavericK96 0 Posted June 29, 2010 AFAIK ArmA2 doesn't use PhysX, though, so that shouldn't make any difference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jpinard 10 Posted June 29, 2010 6/29/10New beta drivers available on nvidia's site. http://www.nvidia.com/object/win7-winvista-64bit-258.69-beta-driver.html Anyone brave enough to try it? I'm not. Not very many bug fixes in this release. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted June 30, 2010 Anyone brave enough to try it? I'm not. Not very many bug fixes in this release. Using them, they fixed an SLI issue with AoC so that's a good thing :D A2 performance is as good as it always is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrunoDerRabe 0 Posted June 30, 2010 AFAIK ArmA2 doesn't use PhysX, though, so that shouldn't make any difference. probably you are right, only difference I do see in the benchmark with the GTX260 dedicated for physics, the action (firefights) in the OA 08 Benchmark start earlier, so you do see most of it .... and not when the camera is turning away strange, isn`t it? I did repeat this tests several times My favorite settings for Testsystem B are now: 1920x1200 Sichtweite: 3876m Qualitätspräf.: Sehr hoch Menüauflösung: 1920x1200 3D Auflösung: 150% 2880x1800 Texturendetails: Sehr hoch Grafikspeicher: Voreinstellung Anisotrop. Filter: Hoch Antialiasing: Hoch Landsch. Details: Sehr Hoch Objektdetails: Sehr hoch Schattendetails: Sehr hoch Nachbearb.-Effekt: Deaktiviert Menügröße: Sehr klein Seitenver.: Breitbild 16:10 The settings are optimized to get the very best smooth high quality images in ArmA2 1.07 while playing the game on the following configuration. 257.21 WHQL Testsystem B: CPU: AMD PhenomII 940 4x3,0GHZ @ 3,0GHZ Memory: 8GB A-DATA DDR2-1066 Motherboard: Asrock K10N780SLIX3-WiFi Graphics Cards Manufacturer: Point Of View and Gainward 2 NVIDIA GPUs: 1 x NVIDIA GeForce 470 GTX plus 1 x NVIDIA GeForce 260 GTX dedicated to physics Sound: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Hard Drive(s): 2 500GB Maxtor hard drives in stripe raid Notes: Cooler Master RealPower Pro 1250W, CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12P, Chieftec Bigtower, Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted June 30, 2010 Arma 2 does not use PhysX. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jpinard 10 Posted July 1, 2010 General: About the Max and Detected frames i think you better test the different values yourself to find what feels best for you. It doesnt seem to matter how close you are HW wise to others as this seems to impact mouse feeling most so some like the heavier/creamier feel and some like the faster/easier feel. Right now im running "1" on both and "2" in the Nvidia CPL (Pre Rendered Frames). In the control settings in game i have smoothness set to about 2 or 3 (two - three clicks from left) and it gives me fast and yet smooth handling.So keep testing until you find your sweet spot. :) What did you mean when you said "I'm running "1" and "2" in NV CPL? Do you run two in SLI or something? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MavericK96 0 Posted July 2, 2010 What did you mean when you said "I'm running "1" and "2" in NV CPL? Do you run two in SLI or something? I think he means: (in the .ini) GPU_MaxFramesAhead=1; GPU_DetectedFramesAhead=1; Max Rendered Frames Ahead (or whatever) in nVidia Control Panel = 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingtip 11 Posted July 2, 2010 vista 64 bit enterprise amd 3.01ghz gforce 280 1gvram 700 watt supply 4 gigs system ram vsync on-28 fps in game benchmark vsync off-35 fps in game benchmark Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dwarden 1125 Posted July 4, 2010 Arma 2 does not use PhysX. the fix was for time when drivers for some reason allocated part of resources for not used physx ... like i said it's no use anymore with last drivers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nossarian 10 Posted July 6, 2010 I'm having trouble getting anything above 20 FPS with most everything as low as it can go. I've tried a few things but nothing seems to work. System specs Intel Core 2 Duo CPU P8700 @ 2.53GHz 2.53 GHz nVidia GeForce GTX 260M Windows 7 64 bit any suggestions? It's also a laptop (It's a high end gaming one, runs most other games on Very High settings pretty well, around 30FPS hover. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SASrecon 0 Posted July 7, 2010 I'm having trouble getting anything above 20 FPS with most everything as low as it can go. I've tried a few things but nothing seems to work.System specs Intel Core 2 Duo CPU P8700 @ 2.53GHz 2.53 GHz nVidia GeForce GTX 260M Windows 7 64 bit any suggestions? It's also a laptop (It's a high end gaming one, runs most other games on Very High settings pretty well, around 30FPS hover. I know it sounds stupid but try raising some settings and experimenting... Also check your background processes, I use a programme called gamebooster, which saves me over 200mb ram every time ;) link: http://www.freewarefiles.com/Game-Booster_program_48865.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites