ArmAII-Mark

[maladiec47 10]

FPS is high enough that I can't tell how much FPS I have

I guess, FPS is too high to measure it with FRAPS:D

[subtee 0]

Texture Detail - High

Video Memory - Default

Anisotropic Filtering - Normal

Terrain Detail - Normal

Objects Detail - Normal

Shadow Detail - High

PostProcess Effects- Disabled

Resolution - 1920 x 1080 (100%)

Cpu - Q9650 (oc 3.3ghz)

Ram - 4 gb

GPU - GTX285

OS - Vista 64

No partition for arma 2 (probably gonna do it if it gives better performance?)

(im using the maxmem=2048 command)

ArmaMark (Second Run)

Test One: 39.7982

Test Two: 45.1947

Test Three: 35.4123

Test Four: 43.6205

Test Five: 28.1127

OFP Mark Is: 3842.77

[FeoFUN 10]

PC specs:

• E8500@4.2GHz
  
• 4Gb DDR2-800@885MHz
  
• GTX260(192sp)/896Mb: GPU@651MHz, Shaders@1403MHz, VRAM@1101MHz
  
• Vista Ultimate x64
  

Tweaks:

• "crysis64.exe"(renamed it, lol) process priority set to "High"
  
• "-maxmem=2048"
  

Game config:

• Resolution: 1680@1050(100% fillrate)
  
• All options are "Normal", but VRAM = "Very High" and PostProcess Effects = "Low"
  

Highest score: 3581

Edited June 25, 2009 by FeoFUN

[ontelo 10]

Interesting fact is that, I normally play with very high/high settings (completely playable) and i tested marks with my settings, those drop only to 2850. Average framrate at scenarios is 35-55

Q9550 @ 3,75Ghz

4870 1Gb

Windows 7 b7100

Auzentech Prelude 7.1

4Gb RAM

[Lavandel 0]

I've tried to search for it but haven't found anything helpful.

How do i get this working?

I downloaded the .pbo-file but where do I put it?

When I've put it in the right location, how do I "load" it?

(guessing it's a missionfile but have no clue as to where to put it)

Thanks in advance.

[binkster 0]

I've tried to search for it but haven't found anything helpful.

How do i get this working?

I downloaded the .pbo-file but where do I put it?

When I've put it in the right location, how do I "load" it?

(guessing it's a missionfile but have no clue as to where to put it)

Thanks in advance.

You put it in spmissions folder and you should be able to find it under scenarios in the missions section.

[f2k sel 164]

OS XP sp3

8800gt 512MB

Nvidia Drivers 186.18

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 2411.1MHz

2GB Memory

Texture Detail - Normal

Anisotropic Filtering - Normal

Terrain Detail - Normal

Objects Detail - Normal

Shadow Detail - Normal

PostProcess Effects- OFF

Resolution - 1600 x 1200

Second Run

==============

test 1 :26.0159

test 2 :22.2732

test 3 :18.3507

test 4 :24.0819

test 5 :14.4221

Arma2Mark :2102.88

Worse than the low score is that it constantly locks ups, 0fps after 3 patches.

Edited June 27, 2009 by F2k Sel

[retrofly 0]

Hi

Windows vista Home premium

Intel Dual CPU E2180 @ 2.00Ghz

6GB DDR2 800Mhz RAM

Geforce GTX260

Recently defrag

Running games booter

Most of Vista "extras" turned off

Settings:

Combination of Normal/high

AA: disabled

PP: disabled

Res: 1920x1080

Render: 1920x1080

Max: 1600

Min: 1200

:butbut::butbut::butbut::butbut:

WTF?

I think its my cpu, dosn't seem to make a difference what rez/settings I use i get the same results @ 1600x900.

I checked in task manager and both CPU's are @ 100%. Is this my bottle neck?

Sucks balls if it is :(

Luke

[galzohar 31]

Yes most likely your CPU, especially after you mentioned they both work 100%...

[binkster 0]

Hi

Windows vista Home premium

Intel Dual CPU E2180 @ 2.00Ghz

6GB DDR2 800Mhz RAM

Geforce GTX260

Recently defrag

Running games booter

Most of Vista "extras" turned off

Settings:

Combination of Normal/high

AA: disabled

PP: disabled

Res: 1920x1080

Render: 1920x1080

Max: 1600

Min: 1200

:butbut::butbut::butbut::butbut:

WTF?

I think its my cpu, dosn't seem to make a difference what rez/settings I use i get the same results @ 1600x900.

I checked in task manager and both CPU's are @ 100%. Is this my bottle neck?

Sucks balls if it is :(

Luke

Since you have a E2180 maybe your motherboard is compatiable with newer core duos? or even quads (q6600) example...? These processors are very cheap now days.

[ste4lth004 10]

Interface Res = 1920x1080

3d Res = 1920x1080

Texture Detail = Normal

Video Memory = Video High

Anisotropic Filt = Normal

Antialiaising = Disabled

Terrain Detail = Low

Objects Detail = Low

Shadows = Normal

Postproc Effects = Disabled

Aspec Ratio = 16:9 Widescreen

----------------

1st Run = 4752

2nd Run = 5526

----------------

Specs =

i7920 3.5ghz

gtx285 stock

6gig Ram

----------------

http://img524.imageshack.us/my.php?image=1strun.jpg

http://img507.imageshack.us/my.php?image=2ndrun.jpg

Edited June 27, 2009 by ste4lth004
I changed the thumbnails to links to help the bandwidth on forums

[killswitch 19]

AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (2.6 GHz, 2x1MiB L2 cache)

nVidia 8800GTS/640 (G80, 96SP) Drivers: 182.50

4 GiB RAM, Vista-64

Settings as per the first post in this thread: 1680x1050, all Normal except Postprocessig at low.

ArmA Mark II score: 1925 :cc:

Edited June 27, 2009 by Killswitch
Added OS

[kremator 1065]

Have tested with AA now. Every other setting at normal, VD at 3310

Here AntiAliasing is set at normal

ArmaMark2 = 4788

Specification of pc ....

Resolution 1680x1050 native

Core i7 2.67GHz stock OCd 3.9GHz

6Gb DDR3 @1567MHz

ATI 4870 OCd at 770MHz Clock, 1070MHz memory

1Tb Samsung Spinpoint

Samsung Syncmaster T220 monitor

G15 Keyboard

Edited June 27, 2009 by Kremator
more information

[ste4lth004 10]

Great score with that 4870 Kremator.

[subtee 0]

Texture Detail - High

Video Memory - Default

Anisotropic Filtering - Normal

Terrain Detail - Normal

Objects Detail - Normal

Shadow Detail - High

PostProcess Effects- Disabled

Resolution - 1920 x 1080 (100%)

Cpu - Q9650 (oc 3.3ghz)

Ram - 4 gb

GPU - GTX285

OS - Vista 64

No partition for arma 2 (probably gonna do it if it gives better performance?)

(im using the maxmem=2048 command)

ArmaMark (Second Run)

Test One: 39.7982

Test Two: 45.1947

Test Three: 35.4123

Test Four: 43.6205

Test Five: 28.1127

OFP Mark Is: 3842.77

So i decided to test windows XP vs Vista.

Formatted my whole drive and started clean.

Created partitions for both operating systems and arma 2.

Installed latest updates and drivers.

Installed arma 2 and updated straight to 1.02.

I used the same settings as in my earlier arma mark test.

Here is the result:

Windows XP (32)

OFP Mark is

First run: 3718.97

Second run: 4306.27

With -maxmem2047= command

First Run: 3707.75

Second Run: 4486.07

Windows Vista (64)

OFP Mark Is

First Run: 2828.05

Second Run: 3243.66

With -maxmem2047= command

OFP Mark Is

First Run: 2966

Second Run: 3642.79

Also tested the first singleplayer mission,

XP seems to do better with Arma 2, more fps and the feel is more responsive because of that.

:)

[rok 0]

2872.56

HD4850, C2D E4300 @3GHz, 4GB DDR2-800, WinXP 32-bit

1920x1080 100%, AA=disabled, PP=low, Everything else=normal

This was on 1.02 earlier build.

EDIT: Now ran some tests with new 1.02 build. (No game restart between these runs.)

1st run: 2726.6

2nd run: 3037.9

3rd run: 3005.7

And last with same settings but AA=normal:

2624.4

EDIT2: Two more tests, AA=disabled, VRAM=default. (No game restart between these runs.)

1st run: 2856

2nd run: 3375

Edited June 27, 2009 by Rok

[adom23 10]

Q6600 2.4gh, 4GB DDR2-800mhz (pc6400), Geforce GTX 260 core 216 896MB, Win 7-64x

Run on second release of 102 hotfix

1680x1050

100% Fill

AA: Normal

Video Memory Very High

Rest are normal

Test 1 - 29.3001

Test 2 - 29.8077

Test 3 - 22.9191

Test 4 - 32.7869

Test 5 - 10.6312

adam_uk's OFPMark is - 2508.9 with geforce 182 drivers

2476 with geforce 186 drivers

2927 with geforce 190 beta drivers - Big increase!

Just seems to stutter a lot on every test .. im assuming my CPU is the bottleneck? Although, when running the CPU runs at about 75%.

Edit: Overclocked CPU from 2.4ghz to 3ghz and still no increase ... so i am giving up for now as I have tried my best lol

Edited June 27, 2009 by adom23

[Lavandel 0]

You put it in spmissions folder and you should be able to find it under scenarios in the missions section.

Thanks m8.

Helps a lot.

[FeoFUN 10]

PC specs:

• E8500@4.2GHz
  
• 4Gb DDR2-800@885MHz
  
• GTX260(192sp)/896Mb: GPU@651MHz, Shaders@1403MHz, VRAM@1101MHz
  
• Vista Ultimate x64
  

Tweaks:

• "crysis64.exe"(renamed it, lol) process priority set to "High"
  
• "-maxmem=2048"
  

Game config:

• Resolution: 1680@1050(100% fillrate)
  
• All options are "Normal", but VRAM = "Very High" and PostProcess Effects = "Low"
  

Highest score: 3581

Run it in Windows XP and WOW! +1100pts or +30%!!!

[GLeek 10]

feofun , what i want to know is lowest/low average /framerate comparaison .

vista has a sort of forced vsync. wich can Cause FPS to NOT go higher than 60Hz with LCD. so XP32 grab some point in highest FPS peak but useless point.

It can cause an higher score in arma mark , without give you anything usefull. in fact, only the median low can tell you if XP32 run faster.

and that is something a lot of us would like to know ;).

ps: FRAPS can give you benchmark sheet with low/average/high fps.

[FeoFUN 10]

vista has a sort of forced vsync. wich can Cause FPS to NOT go higher than 60Hz with LCD. so XP32 grab some point in highest FPS peak but useless point.

Not in this case. Now game running drastically faster and smoother, so now i able to play with all "Very high" settings and view distance=3km, even in the big towns, like Elektrozavodsk and Chernogorsk. Now i'm happy. =)))

[binkster 0]

Not in this case. Now game running drastically faster and smoother, so now i able to play with all "Very high" settings and view distance=3km, even in the big towns, like Elektrozavodsk and Chernogorsk. Now i'm happy. =)))

Good to hear. Ive been trying to get others to confirm and you did... Thanks

[Gamer 10]

Re-ran the test using renamed Crysis.exe

5601

[datakill 1]

I7 920 @ 3.9ghz (watercooled)

3GB RAM DD3 OCZ

Rampage II

GTX280 OC (693/1323/1512)

1680X1050

WIN XP

Game settings :

3D_Performance=93750;

Resolution_Bpp=32;

Resolution_W=1680;

Resolution_H=1050;

refresh=60;

Render_W=2100;

Render_H=1312;

FSAA=2;

postFX=2;

HDRPrecision=8;

4998

[Grimfist 0]

Settings on mixture of high/normal/very high.

Manufacturer: PCspecialist

Processor: Intel® Core2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz (4 CPUs)

Memory: 4000MB RAM

Hard Drive: 750 GB

Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

Monitor: 24 inch

Sound Card: Realtek HD Audio output

Speakers/Headphones: Digital Precision

Keyboard: Tesco value keyboard

Mouse: Microsoft Laser mouse 5000

Mouse Surface: RAF Avro Vulcan mousemat? lol

Operating System: Windows XP Home Edition

Motherboard: ASUS PND-5

Computer Case: Conqueror

WITH GAME BOOSTER

I really do recommend this program.