mr burns 131 Posted July 17, 2007 Seems so, i´m gonna ask jagdpanther whats up with that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warchlaq 0 Posted September 17, 2007 Test one : 69.587 Test two : 51.392 Test three: 58.9476 Test four : 36.9914 Test five : 3.2616 Ofpmark : 5103.59 On intel c2d e6750@3.2ghz, 2gb ddr II 800@900mhz cl4, gainward 8800gtx @ 625/1900 My setting in arma: res: 1280x1024 terrain on normal, textures v.high, objects v.high, shading detail high, shadow detail high, post procesing low, antialiasing normal, anizo normal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mehmehmeh 0 Posted September 18, 2007 1828.02 @ 2560x1600 res Q6600 2 GB RAM 2x evga 8800 SLI Win XP Game settings, all high. View dist. 2.5k. Post effects high. Avg. 28-30fps with Fraps. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
volkov956 0 Posted September 19, 2007 I noticed if i reran the test on my other gaming rig the Benchmark Results would jump another 700points so maybe retry it after u ran it in one session oh and just for the hell of it the first makr where the ai is supposed to cross the bridge he got stuck and could not get across in one of the tests Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rawr 0 Posted October 5, 2007 (Test 1)Settings: 1280x1024x32 75Hz Landscape: Low Objects: Medium Textures: Medium Shading: Medium Post Proc.: High Anisotropic: Very Low AA: Low Shadows: High (Test 1)Results: 1: 17,2269 2: 12,2194 3: 13,3958 4: 9,6231 5: 13,1014 1311,34 ! ------------------------ (Test 2)Settings: 1280x1024x32 75Hz Everything on Very Low/Disabled (Test 2)Results: 1: 21,1758 2: 16,5067 3: 18,2236 4: 11,2024 5: 14,2943 1628,05 ! After comparing my results with others here, I get a feeling that something is terribly wrong with my rig. Avg. FPS: 19 (>10 in bigger missions) GPU: XFX GeForce 7900GT 256Mb CPU: AMD Opteron 146 RAM: 2GB PC3200 Soundcard: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer OS: Windows XP SP2 DirectX: 9.0c (downloaded in september) Graphics driver: Latest Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
InqWiper 0 Posted October 6, 2007 Terrain: Very low Object detail: low Texture detail: low Shading detail: low Postprocess effects: low Anistropic filtering: disabled Shadow detail: low Antialiasing: disabled Blood: low Resolution: 1280x1024x32. Everything set to max performance in CCC. 2.8GHz 1GB RAM x800xt Test2 14.1393 11.0818 9.90422 9.55414 8.70663 1067.72 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anykey 1 Posted April 7, 2008 Pentium 4 3GHZ , 1gb ddr1 , Leadtek GeForce 7600 GT graphics settings : normal test 1 : 9.03164 test 2 : 7.54386 test 3: 5.7772 test 4: 5.7419 test 5: 5.38671 OFP mark : 669.626 there are a problem with my computer no ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr burns 131 Posted April 7, 2008 Pentium 4 3GHZ , 1gb ddr1 , Leadtek GeForce 7600 GTgraphics settings : normal test 1 : 9.03164 test 2 : 7.54386 test 3: 5.7772 test 4: 5.7419 test 5: 5.38671 OFP mark : 669.626 there are a problem with my computer no ? wth, that´s some pretty low scores Im getting >1500 with my current rig (same as in first post): AMD XP2500+ @2150Mhz XFX 7800GS AGP Asus A7N8X 2*512MB Mushkin Special Edition (PC3200) @ CL2,3,2,11 Medium to low graphic settings that is. The latest 1.12beta patch also didn´t change the result at all - although in normal gemaplay it feels alot more fluent. Might help if you posted the used graphical settings too. atm i can only guess that your gfx card is the weak part. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pirin 0 Posted April 7, 2008 The Arma Mark web site is no more ?1. As new user I was looking for this as well and found a download here: http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=423 FWIW: Using Normal settings as the readme said @1024x768 28/38/31/20/28 total of 2927. Using Very High everything, but High Shadows @1680x1050: 22/24/28/19/19 total of 2278. 2.13GHz P4, 2GB RAM, 8800GT 512MB Nvidia. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fatbob 0 Posted April 7, 2008 What is the problem with my PC? 2.8GhZ P4, 2.5gb RAM, GeForce FX5700 128mb @800x600, very low, visibility 500 1-11.3158 2-6.09756 3-7.53985 4-4.54494 5-9.10844 Overall Score-772.132 Reccomendations on a new graphics card appreciated, ive got an AGP 4x/8x bus Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shoaib 0 Posted April 10, 2008 What is the problem with my PC?2.8GhZ P4, 2.5gb RAM, GeForce FX5700 128mb @800x600, very low, visibility 500 1-11.3158 2-6.09756 3-7.53985 4-4.54494 5-9.10844 Overall Score-772.132 Reccomendations on a new graphics card appreciated, ive got an AGP 4x/8x bus Your CPU is weak, and your graphic card is very very weak, upgrade these two and you'll see improvement in your arma score. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-DirTyDeeDs--Ziggy- 0 Posted April 11, 2008 Since this topic has been revisited... my latest Mark. My current rig P5n32 SLI premium / C2D E6600 @ 3.0 / 2ghz DDR2 Corsair 6400 / Evga GF 7950 512 mb / 74gb WD / 700 watt Thermaltake PSU / XFi-Xtremegamer ArmA 1.08 @ normal settings @ what I play settings here are my play settings Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oChaos.DNJ 0 Posted April 11, 2008 Gigabyte 965P-DS3 Rev3.3, E6600 @ 3.2GHz (400x8), 2GB DDR2-800 (1:1, 4-4-4-12), 8800GTS 640MB (Core=621, Shader=1458, Mem=945[1890]). 2- 40GB WD SATA150's in RAID0, 600w Ultra PSU WinXP Pro SP3-RC2 NVIDIA Drivers 174.74 NVIDIA CP settings -AntiAliasing Gamma Correction =On -AntiAliasing Transparency = Off -Pre Rendered Frames = 1 -Negative LOD Bias = Clamp -Quality= High Quality -Vsync = Force Off No Page File, DisablePagingExecutive = 1 1.08 Normal = 4868 1.12b Normal= 4906 1.12b My Settings= 3888 btw Ziggy, if your playing at 1280x1024 the Aspect Ratio should be at 5:4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ike_fin 0 Posted April 11, 2008 1. 49 2. 47 3. 38 4. 26 5. 37 ArmaMark: 3985 I also tried windowed mode and result were significantly lower: 3092 E8200 @ 3ghz 2gb 800mhz Asus 8800GTS g92 Abit IP-35e X-fi XtremeMusic EAX and HW on Newly installed 64bit Vista SP1 with latest drivers Arma 1.12b Normal settings @ 1280x1024 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr burns 131 Posted April 11, 2008 anyone got his map uploaded. stupid site says Access Denied. Fixed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-DirTyDeeDs--Ziggy- 0 Posted April 12, 2008 Quote[/b] ]The availability of inexpensive LCD monitors has made the 5:4 aspect ratio resolution of 1280×1024 more popular for desktop usage. DOH!! I changed my ratio to 5:4 and re-ran the ArmA Mark mission @ my play settings, and it jumped from 3850 to 4100. 5:4 appears to show a little less of the screen than 4:3 and that is supported by my Mark score. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mattxr 9 Posted April 12, 2008 I got : 3180.89 With everything on Very High / High with Res: 1440-900 is that any good? Higher or lower the score better? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr.g-c 6 Posted April 14, 2008 My System: Athlon 64 S939 3700+ 1MB-Cache @3000MHZ, 2GB DDR1-RAM, GF9600GT-512MB - Geforce 174.74 At my settings under win-vista ultimate 32bit, i get 2496.xx with disabled aero-glass and disabled vista-sidebar. With them both enabled i get only 2402.xx. I've also tried it at the killer 3Ghz Quadcore of my brother and on a multicore system like this, it seems the vista aero-glass and the vista-sidebar have NO influence at all. Best Regards, Christian Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fasad 1 Posted April 14, 2008 Hehe, I was bored and too tired to do anything productive. 4:3 on Normal : And going for maximum score : edit: fasad's PC specs Tip: your FPS can never be higher than your refresh rate Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BraTTy 0 Posted April 14, 2008 Wow ! could you add your pc specs please Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DarkSoul 0 Posted April 16, 2008 has anyone computer with amd 64 3200+ and ati 3850 or 3870... my old graphics card is broken so im going to get ati 3850 maybe so i wonder how much new graphics card will "Boost up" my computer im going to upgrate CPU later... no money no honey Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buzz 0 Posted May 10, 2008 Test1:22.1533 Test2:23.4347 Test3:20.3051 Test4:12.3178 Test5:19.0356 Total:1944.93 AMD 3800+ @2.0 Ghz XFX 8600 GTS W/256 Ram 2 GB Crucial Ram Is it my imagination or are my test results really low. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr burns 131 Posted May 12, 2008 Is it my imagination or are my test results really low. Too high ingame settgins, or too high expectations from a not so spectacular computer? Dont know if the graphics card is any good, but with this cpu you can be glad to have a higher score than me edit: New rig made 3700 pts. with all settings maxed out Share this post Link to post Share on other sites