ArmA-Mark

[mr burns 131]

Seems so, i´m gonna ask jagdpanther whats up with that

[warchlaq 0]

Test one : 69.587

Test two : 51.392

Test three: 58.9476

Test four : 36.9914

Test five : 3.2616

Ofpmark : 5103.59

On intel c2d e6750@3.2ghz, 2gb ddr II 800@900mhz cl4, gainward 8800gtx @ 625/1900

My setting in arma:

res: 1280x1024

terrain on normal, textures v.high, objects v.high, shading detail high, shadow detail high, post procesing low, antialiasing normal, anizo normal.

[Mehmehmeh 0]

1828.02

@

2560x1600 res

Q6600

2 GB RAM

2x evga 8800 SLI

Win XP

Game settings, all high. View dist. 2.5k. Post effects high.

Avg. 28-30fps with Fraps.

[volkov956 0]

I noticed if i reran the test on my other gaming rig the Benchmark Results would jump another 700points so maybe retry it after u ran it in one session

oh and just for the hell of it the first makr where the ai is supposed to cross the bridge he got stuck and could not get across in one of the tests

[Rawr 0]

(Test 1)Settings:

1280x1024x32 75Hz

Landscape: Low

Objects: Medium

Textures: Medium

Shading: Medium

Post Proc.: High

Anisotropic: Very Low

AA: Low

Shadows: High

(Test 1)Results:

1: 17,2269

2: 12,2194

3: 13,3958

4: 9,6231

5: 13,1014

1311,34 !

------------------------

(Test 2)Settings:

1280x1024x32 75Hz

Everything on Very Low/Disabled

(Test 2)Results:

1: 21,1758

2: 16,5067

3: 18,2236

4: 11,2024

5: 14,2943

1628,05 !

After comparing my results with others here, I get a feeling that something is terribly wrong with my rig.

Avg. FPS: 19 (>10 in bigger missions)

GPU: XFX GeForce 7900GT 256Mb

CPU: AMD Opteron 146

RAM: 2GB PC3200

Soundcard: Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer

OS: Windows XP SP2

DirectX: 9.0c (downloaded in september)

Graphics driver: Latest

[InqWiper 0]

Terrain: Very low

Object detail: low

Texture detail: low

Shading detail: low

Postprocess effects: low

Anistropic filtering: disabled

Shadow detail: low

Antialiasing: disabled

Blood: low

Resolution: 1280x1024x32.

Everything set to max performance in CCC.

2.8GHz

1GB RAM

x800xt

Test2

14.1393

11.0818

9.90422

9.55414

8.70663

1067.72

[Anykey 1]

Pentium 4 3GHZ , 1gb ddr1 , Leadtek GeForce 7600 GT

graphics settings : normal

test 1 : 9.03164

test 2 : 7.54386

test 3: 5.7772

test 4: 5.7419

test 5: 5.38671

OFP mark : 669.626

there are a problem with my computer no ?

[mr burns 131]

Pentium 4 3GHZ , 1gb ddr1 , Leadtek GeForce 7600 GT

graphics settings : normal

test 1 : 9.03164

test 2 : 7.54386

test 3: 5.7772

test 4: 5.7419

test 5: 5.38671

OFP mark : 669.626

there are a problem with my computer no ?

wth, that´s some pretty low scores

Im getting >1500 with my current rig (same as in first post):

AMD XP2500+ @2150Mhz

XFX 7800GS AGP

Asus A7N8X

2*512MB Mushkin Special Edition (PC3200) @ CL2,3,2,11

Medium to low graphic settings that is. The latest 1.12beta patch also didn´t change the result at all - although in normal gemaplay it feels alot more fluent.

Might help if you posted the used graphical settings too.

atm i can only guess that your gfx card is the weak part.

[Pirin 0]

The Arma Mark web site is no more ?

1.

As new user I was looking for this as well and found a download here:

http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=423

FWIW:

Using Normal settings as the readme said @1024x768

28/38/31/20/28 total of 2927.

Using Very High everything, but High Shadows @1680x1050:

22/24/28/19/19 total of 2278.

2.13GHz P4, 2GB RAM, 8800GT 512MB Nvidia.

[Fatbob 0]

What is the problem with my PC?

2.8GhZ P4, 2.5gb RAM, GeForce FX5700 128mb

@800x600, very low, visibility 500

1-11.3158

2-6.09756

3-7.53985

4-4.54494

5-9.10844

Overall Score-772.132

Reccomendations on a new graphics card appreciated, ive got an AGP 4x/8x bus

[Shoaib 0]

What is the problem with my PC?

2.8GhZ P4, 2.5gb RAM, GeForce FX5700 128mb

@800x600, very low, visibility 500

1-11.3158

2-6.09756

3-7.53985

4-4.54494

5-9.10844

Overall Score-772.132

Reccomendations on a new graphics card appreciated, ive got an AGP 4x/8x bus

Your CPU is weak, and your graphic card is very very weak, upgrade these two and you'll see improvement in your arma score.

[-DirTyDeeDs--Ziggy- 0]

Since this topic has been revisited... my latest Mark.

My current rig

P5n32 SLI premium / C2D E6600 @ 3.0 / 2ghz DDR2 Corsair 6400 / Evga GF 7950 512 mb / 74gb WD / 700 watt Thermaltake PSU / XFi-Xtremegamer

ArmA 1.08 @ normal settings

@ what I play settings

here are my play settings

[oChaos.DNJ 0]

Gigabyte 965P-DS3 Rev3.3, E6600 @ 3.2GHz (400x8), 2GB DDR2-800 (1:1, 4-4-4-12), 8800GTS 640MB (Core=621, Shader=1458, Mem=945[1890]). 2- 40GB WD SATA150's in RAID0, 600w Ultra PSU

WinXP Pro SP3-RC2

NVIDIA Drivers 174.74

NVIDIA CP settings

-AntiAliasing Gamma Correction =On

-AntiAliasing Transparency = Off

-Pre Rendered Frames = 1

-Negative LOD Bias = Clamp

-Quality= High Quality

-Vsync = Force Off

No Page File, DisablePagingExecutive = 1

1.08 Normal = 4868

1.12b Normal= 4906

1.12b My Settings= 3888

btw Ziggy, if your playing at 1280x1024 the Aspect Ratio should be at 5:4

[Ike_fin 0]

1. 49

2. 47

3. 38

4. 26

5. 37

ArmaMark: 3985

I also tried windowed mode and result were significantly lower: 3092

E8200 @ 3ghz

2gb 800mhz

Asus 8800GTS g92

Abit IP-35e

X-fi XtremeMusic EAX and HW on

Newly installed 64bit Vista SP1 with latest drivers

Arma 1.12b Normal settings @ 1280x1024

[mattxr 9]

says Access Denied.

[mr burns 131]

anyone got his map uploaded. stupid site says Access Denied.

Fixed

[-DirTyDeeDs--Ziggy- 0]

Quote[/b] ]The availability of inexpensive LCD monitors has made the 5:4 aspect ratio resolution of 1280×1024 more popular for desktop usage.

DOH!!

I changed my ratio to 5:4 and re-ran the ArmA Mark mission @ my play settings, and it jumped from 3850 to 4100.

5:4 appears to show a little less of the screen than 4:3 and that is supported by my Mark score.

[oChaos.DNJ 0]

Yeah.

[mattxr 9]

I got : 3180.89

With everything on Very High / High with Res: 1440-900

is that any good? Higher or lower the score better?

[mr.g-c 6]

My System: Athlon 64 S939 3700+ 1MB-Cache @3000MHZ, 2GB DDR1-RAM, GF9600GT-512MB - Geforce 174.74

At my settings under win-vista ultimate 32bit, i get 2496.xx with disabled aero-glass and disabled vista-sidebar. With them both enabled i get only 2402.xx.

I've also tried it at the killer 3Ghz Quadcore of my brother and on a multicore system like this, it seems the vista aero-glass and the vista-sidebar have NO influence at all.

Best Regards, Christian

[fasad 1]

Hehe, I was bored and too tired to do anything productive.

4:3 on Normal :

And going for maximum score :

edit: fasad's PC specs

Tip: your FPS can never be higher than your refresh rate

[BraTTy 0]

Wow ! could you add your pc specs please

[DarkSoul 0]

has anyone computer with amd 64 3200+ and ati 3850 or 3870... my old graphics card is broken so im going to get ati 3850 maybe so i wonder how much new graphics card will "Boost up" my computer

im going to upgrate CPU later... no money no honey

[Buzz 0]

Test1:22.1533

Test2:23.4347

Test3:20.3051

Test4:12.3178

Test5:19.0356

Total:1944.93

AMD 3800+ @2.0 Ghz

XFX 8600 GTS W/256 Ram

2 GB Crucial Ram

Is it my imagination or are my test results really low.

[mr burns 131]

Is it my imagination or are my test results really low.

Too high ingame settgins, or too high expectations from a not so spectacular computer?

Dont know if the graphics card is any good, but with this cpu you can be glad to have a higher score than me

edit: New rig made 3700 pts. with all settings maxed out