ArmA-Mark

[WhoCares 0]

Did you also run it a second time as suggested in the first post. With the 640MB RAM of the GTS I'd expect all textures to be preloaded.

Though I never got such bad results, even with other applications running in the background, vsync=on/off, ... Very odd

[twoodster 0]

Yup, the second pass runs just as badly as the first

[CanisDEK 1]

2272 - and that's after I spent 330quid on an 8800GTS!!

Athlon 64 3500

2gig Crucial DDR400 ram

Hmmm there must be something wrong with your system. That low score doesn't really fit your system.

Sometimes people save some money by buying a cheap MB and they have nice hardware sitting on a crap MB resulting in a crap system.

I don't know what components you have used... but something is not right.

[twoodster 0]

I managed to get it up to 3100ish by adding the memory line to the startup command. Still seems very low in comparison to similar systems though.

The problem definately seems to be with the textures not loading quick enough or something - the hard disc clunks like hell on the runway sequence and the spinning camera tests. I've got the downloaded version - is there a problem with that at all?

[WhoCares 0]

Actually it might be that at these settings the game is CPU limited. Esp. when looking on other results, e.g. with the GF7xxx 256-512MB, Athlon A64 and X2s..., they are mostly in the 2k-4k range. Compared to my results (as I have these best in mind) it mostly correlated to the CPU and better GFX cards didn't matter very much.

Just to compare it with my results on page 2, could you also make a run (or 2 ) @1280x1024 & 'Very High'?

I could imagine that if you activated post processing, Anisotropic Filtering and other settings that are solely handled by the GPU (no additional CPU load) you would still have similar results.

[Herbert0100 0]

i get same performance on 8800 gtx e6600 2gb 800mhz ram really bad

[twoodster 0]

On 1280x1024 - Very High...........I get..............1992! Impressive stuff!

Interesting that you have the same problem Herbert. Perhaps we've chosen the one stupidly expensive graphics card that doesn't actually work with the game Although saying that, someone else said they had a GTX and were getting 8000 odd.

[WhoCares 0]

There have been three other results posted with e6600+GF8800GTX which score 6-~9k - so the game should run fine with the card...

[BVE 0]

waaa..

My results on normal settings:

Test1=14.7195

test2=4.47909

test3=16.3807

test4=4.39689

test5=3.66516

OFPMARK = 872.828

Windows XP

P4 3.1ghz

1042 MBRam

Geforce 6600GT 128MB AGP

[berowe 0]

1394 score

4yr old PC but it held up aight I spose.

P4 2.2

Radeon 9500 Pro 128mb oc'd to 300/300ish (I think)

768rdram (yeah.. stfu..)

The airfield textures didn't even load until right near the end of that test- looked pretty bad.

[silola 1086]

hi,

my result ...

my system ...

intel c2d e6600@2.6ghz

ati x1950pro 256mb

1 gb ram

winxp home ed. sp2

[xerxes1er 0]

Here is my result in 1280x1024 resolution and all Video settings as Normal and View Distance 1200 with my following spec :

AMD 64 4000+ Core San Diego

A8N SLI PRENIUM

2 Go Ram Corsair

7800 GTX 256 Mo

XP SP 2

[binkster 0]

I think its more cpu and memory. My first score on page 2 was 6479 at 3.2ghz memory is at 800mhz 5,5,5,14 and i changed cpu to 3.38ghz and changed memory to 4,4,4,12 and got 6856. I dont want to push my cpu any farther with just stock fans. But I can be well over 7k at 4ghz im sure....

[mattxr 9]

I dont get it?

Is a high bench better or a low one?

anyways here is mine

AMD Athlon 64 X2 Duel Core Processor 4200+

2.21Ghz, 3Gig of Ram

GF 7600 GT

[van Nistelrooy 0]

Well, I think all those results confirmed that I've got a problem with ArmA.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+

Corsair TwinX 2048 Mo PC3200

7950GX2 1024 Mo PCI-E

ArmA german version patched 1.01

1280x1024x32@75Hz

All details on "high" except shading detail and postprocessing on "low"

45.7045

22.0122

50.3764

19.2277

17.184

total: 3090.10

[pwablo 0]

Updated with Results from final release version 0.2.

Dropped by 500 marks with fixed tests 2 & 3

Thanks for making this Benchmark Mr Burns

[b1sh0p 0]

3040.97

P4 3.6ghz

2gigs of ram

BFG 7900 512mb

[CameronMcDonald 146]

Hahaha, I put in my crappier video card (a 6600TD) again, then had a go:

I think we all know what's dragging my results down here...

PC: 3.4 P4 (@ 3.78GHz), 2GB DDRII Corsair 592MHz, P5WDH Deluxe, ASUS (NVidia) 6600TD, SB Audigy 2ZS.

[stisoas 0]

hi,

my result ...

my system ...

intel c2d e6600@2.6ghz

ati x1950pro 256mb

1 gb ram

winxp home ed. sp2

ok so, we got our answer...

core2duo is definitly the way to choose. i have a A642.4ghz,X1900XT,2GB , and i do 3200 where you do 4400.

[zwobot 17]

1.73 GHz Intel Pentium M

1 GB RAM

Ati mobility radeon X700 XL 128MB

The results are:

Test one: 13.0108

Test two: 13.1901

Test three: 16.2449

Test four: 10.9419

Test five: 11.3493

OFP Mark is 1294.74

[Talbot 0]

P4 2.8Ghz 533Mhz FSB

2x512MB PC3200 RAM

Nvidia 6800GT 256MB

Score: 1995.14

Please tell me that score is normal for my system. It is 5 years old and has been through numerous akward upgrades. I have to rest with the fact that I won't be playing ARMA until the new system in January (Vista month).

[guerilla -MCY- 0]

ARMA Results:

1. 69.3792

2. 42.2808

3. 75.1221

4. 25.3646

5. 28.8794

Benchmark: 4820.52

System: Core 2Duo E6700 4MB - MSI NX8800GTX 768MB - 4 x 1GB, 667MHz PC 5300 - EVGA nForce 680i SLI - 2 x 400 GB HD

PS: no CPU & GFX overclocking at all

[BAZZ 0]

Specs:

AMD 64 4000 (San Diego) Oc'd to 3.0 GHz.

1GB Ram (2x512)Twinmos Twister Pro (TCCD) at 1:1 FSB 250/2.5-3-3-6 1T CR

Radeon X850XT PE at 600/600 MHz.

And yeah, i sure post a lot here .....

[mr burns 131]

Alright, we have a final release!

Download

(click "Download" on the right and wait some seconds)

Result database can be found here: ArmA Mark Homepage

Hoping to see you there.

Have fun and don´t toast your rig´s

edit: Updated first post.

[deFiler 0]

Edit: removed link