Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

oukej

Former Developer
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    1063

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

  • Medals

Everything posted by oukej

  1. oukej
    Talking purely about measures yes. However considering the full dispersion it means that only some portion of the hits (50%, 80%? diameter or radius?) will probably fall within that circle. Meaning that the outermost hits can easily be spread much more.
  2. oukej
    Also one thing to keep in mind when looking at real life references about ammo precision is that the data is often given as either 1σ or circular error probable. With that in mind (correct me if I'm wrong, please) e.g. 4 mrad will give you something like 10m extreme spread radius on 1000m.
  3. oukej

    Field of view changes with increasing speed

    oukej replied to kevinsue's topic in ARMA 3 - GENERAL

    FoV speed sensitivity is currently being removed from the game on the Dev-branch.
  4. oukej
    Thanks! The dev-branch update didn't contain the latest changes, this should be gone with the next update.
  5. oukej

    AI Discussion (dev branch)

    oukej replied to klamacz's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    Caused some misunderstanding here, I'm sorry about it. We do perceive it as a bug too (and tracked it's existence back to 2007). We were dealing with it a year ago and we decided against fixing it due to risks involved in the required changes. If anything changes we'll definitely let you know.
  6. oukej
  7. oukej

    AI Discussion (dev branch)

    oukej replied to klamacz's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    Thanks a lot! Should be fixed soon™
  8. oukej

    AI Discussion (dev branch)

    oukej replied to klamacz's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    It's been the same in Arma 2 :/
  9. oukej

    AI Discussion (dev branch)

    oukej replied to klamacz's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Dynamic_Airport_Configuration I've fixed https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/landAt
  10. oukej
    Mainly the missile is now able to lock onto the target provided by the said radar. Previously was only possible in some form with autoSeekTarget. Locking also allows the AI to utilize the feature. This is simplified to a degree that the missile uses it's own seeker from the start. But this way it can lock on a target provided by datalink without requiring the launching platform to have its own radar.
  11. oukej

    AI Discussion (dev branch)

    oukej replied to klamacz's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    It was extended to work with "dynamic airports" - e.g. aircraft carrier or an "invisible strip" that you could place on a road and make the airplanes land there. The documentation seems inaccurate.
  12. oukej
  13. oukej

    AI Discussion (dev branch)

    oukej replied to klamacz's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    Completion radius isn't checked all the time in all behaviors. AI checks completion often in combat or stealth. In aware or safe the AI will always go to the precise WP position before completing it.
  14. oukej
    Nice vid ;) We're aware of this one (abrupt acceleration, tracks doing weird stuff, loss of control).
  15. oukej

    Tanks - Fire-control system

    oukej replied to oukej's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    We usually tend to scale ranges down to fit the scaling of the terrains, for performance reasons, gameplay purposes and relative balance. Instead of realistic absolute values we try to focus more on what I'd call "authentic ratios". But it's not a single universal ratio - often the bigger the munition's range is IRL the more we need to scale it down in the game. Look at radar homing missiles ;) The goal is an engagement with somewhat accurate combat roles. Everything else is subject to scaling.
  16. oukej
    Confirming and acknowledging. I can confirm that one too. As a configurable behavior (whatever mod may require it... a drone, mini tank, mechanized turtleosaurus, or just a more arcade tank mod). Vanilla commanding of MBTs will require AI driver.
  17. oukej
    Yup, that's the "RPM spike" issue...sometimes warps the tank a bit, sometimes it breaks turning or causes other glitches in the physics. It's been around for too long and it's top on our list.
  18. oukej
    You've already noticed...just in case ;) Known issues at this point are: occasional RPM spikes during turns that can abruptly "accelerate" the vehicle occasional loss of control in turns on some tanks (move fwd or back to get out of the broken state) sometimes climbing onto vegetation before destroying it int. sound in turn out and commander view tank (hasdriver=true) can be driven from commander even without AI driver less pronounced recoil ('frozen' suspension) when stationary possibly too high neutral turn rate
  19. oukej
    PhysX update affects all objects that use the PhysX simulation. The change of wheels contact queries from raycast to sweep has already affected all wheeled and tracked vehicles. But otherwise there's no plan to globally revisit cars' configurations at this moment. Individual changes may still happen.
  20. oukej

    AI Driving - Feedback topic

    oukej replied to klamacz's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    Because of the resolution of the path "nodes" the offset is set more towards center to avoid AI cutting corners. Tweaks are definitely possible, offsets have been set up prior to the driving refactoring.
  21. oukej
    There's also few sub-classes with different UI controls. Exactly "RscCustomInfoMyCustomRadModule" class in the config root.
  22. oukej
    Varsuk config hasn't been changed yet Maybe changing how the player's input is handled could solve these issues. Perhaps some people in the team watched too much of youtube and didn't listen to mil. advisor's remarks about dropping tracks, ripping off idler wheels and stuff going AWOL
  23. oukej

    AI Driving - Feedback topic

    oukej replied to klamacz's topic in ARMA 3 - DEVELOPMENT BRANCH

    Check AIpathOffset in MapXY/Data/Roads/RoadsLib.cfg. It sets the path offset from the edge of the road. (green lines)
  24. oukej
    Awesome, thanks! The issue's still there. Hoped we've at least reduced the effects - so you managed to flip it just by turning? We're trying to solve this one. Introduced by the better wheel contact queries and changed reject angles. Caused by some residual forward input. We hope to still do some tweaks in the way input is handed over to PhysX. #Tomorrow Actually Kuma has that position changed to higher point (previously the camera was more behind the tank). Higher FoV is a possibility but at a cost of some fish-eye distortion and maybe "way too good" awareness in 3PV. The RPM goes down in turns in the simulation too. Depending on the gear selected when entering the turn. Not sure we'll be able to solve it. We can't make the vehicle downshift for turns only, on the other hand the sound can go a bit around the simulation. In neutral turns this should be better.
  25. oukej
    The first tank to look at is the MBT-52 Kuma. Fire feedback at will! Let us know what you think about its handling and the new sound. Look at steering, traction, weight shifting, suspension, transmission, "bounciness", fun, overall feel. Listen to the engine revving, tracks clucking, creaking during turns, check both 1PV and 3PV Try turning on spot (neutral turn), turning in slow and high speed, accelerating, braking, transitioning from forward drive to reverse, drifting (just a tiny bit), climbing, driving downhill, etc. Known issues are: possibly too high neutral turn rate occasional RPM spikes during turns that can abruptly "accelerate" the vehicle
×