HOPEnSPIRIT 10 Posted July 12, 2009 Email from BattlEye developer Bastian Suter Hi,there is no BE in ArmA2 right now. It's up to BIS to decide if they want to buy a license or not. Regards, Bastian Suter ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Pearson To: support@battleye.com Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 6:58 PM Subject: ArmA II Are there plans for BattlEye in ArmA II? I had someone mention it in BIforum that they use BattlEye, but when asked to confirm it I got no reply. Andrew Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jw custom 56 Posted July 12, 2009 I haven't voted yet as i have no idea how this BattlEye works, never heard of it before. Does it make people lag? Does it actually keep cheaters out(i know PB doesn't)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HOPEnSPIRIT 10 Posted July 12, 2009 In ArmA 1 we kept getting the servers mission messed up by hackers until BattlEye came out, since BattlEye we haven't had one case of hacking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-wow-titan 10 Posted July 12, 2009 +1 for battleye death for cheaters! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EricM 0 Posted July 12, 2009 I've witnessed plenty of TK from newcomers, but no hacking yet... Maybe they're to new to know how to do it though... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.kju 3245 Posted July 12, 2009 Eventually hardware/driver cheaters will come. We need BE to protect public and league play. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HOPEnSPIRIT 10 Posted July 15, 2009 Bastian was developing more Admin commands for managing your server for future releases in ArmA, there are alot of people asking for this type of control in ArmA II. Another reason to Vote YES! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
maddogx 13 Posted July 15, 2009 +1 for BattlEye We need to lobby BIS for this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deadfast 43 Posted July 15, 2009 I wish to see the light of the day when people actually make an unbiased poll :rolleyes: That said I'm all up for BattleEye though. Yes, it is true innocent people were getting kicked, but that was usually down to unstable connection or slow computer. Anyone who thinks this is terrible should take a look on PunkBuster ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EricM 0 Posted July 15, 2009 (edited) I wish to see the light of the day when people actually make an unbiased poll +1 : Do you wish to have it all and then some more (including freetrack, fastrope and FLIR) ? Though at the moment I feel it's not necessary. Signed addons already made things much better. Maybe later if this becomes a hackfest... so let's be provocative and say no. Edited July 15, 2009 by EricM Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whisper 0 Posted July 15, 2009 Eventually hardware/driver cheaters will come. We need BE to protect public and league play. "eventually" is "today", in fact +1 for BE Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
arma2disapointed 10 Posted July 15, 2009 I wish to see the light of the day when people actually make an unbiased poll :rolleyes:That said I'm all up for BattleEye though. Yes, it is true innocent people were getting kicked, but that was usually down to unstable connection or slow computer. Anyone who thinks this is terrible should take a look on PunkBuster ;) Agreed but voted no. Creater should always kick as he like. Stupid poll Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HOPEnSPIRIT 10 Posted July 15, 2009 Maybe I should have added a 3rd option, YES! if it don't kick me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
r71 0 Posted July 15, 2009 last thing I need is more junk for my computer to lag me more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HOPEnSPIRIT 10 Posted July 15, 2009 My ArmA 1 was going to gather dust on the shelf until BattlEye came out, it saved Multiplayer from hackers. And it is not intensive if anything the ArmA scripts themselves are more intensive than BattEye, do not rubbish and mock something you have not even tried. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Defunkt 431 Posted August 2, 2009 I don't see how anybody can market a multi-player game today without a viable anti-hax system. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nutlink 10 Posted August 2, 2009 I wish to see the light of the day when people actually make an unbiased poll :rolleyes:That said I'm all up for BattleEye though. Yes, it is true innocent people were getting kicked, but that was usually down to unstable connection or slow computer. Anyone who thinks this is terrible should take a look on PunkBuster ;) Here here! While I'd prefer BattleEye being available, I get tired of seeing utterly biased polls. A simple Yes/No/Maybe with a request to state your reasoning for your vote would be a much better way of putting it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Goldline 0 Posted August 2, 2009 NO plz i dont wanna see it back. only thing what it does is lag the servers tremendously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hyp3rdyn3 10 Posted August 2, 2009 BattleEye would stop FreeTrack from working. :/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hoak 0 Posted August 3, 2009 (edited) There are several other Anti-Cheat solutions, some better in some regards to BattleEye; BI could license: SteamWorks/VAC allowing anyone owning an ArmA II key to play through Steam, nProtect, HackShield, and of course PunkBuster just to name a few... Each has its advantages in license costs, the range of exploits it can cover, how easy it is to update, client overhead, and effects on client latency. Personally I think SteamWorks/VAC offers the biggest bang for the buck, but any well implemented anti-cheat system is better then none. I think what BI/ArmA II really need is a 'killer' MP game-mode or Mod, that is more accessible, offers more immediate appeal and gratification to those less versed in our favorite genre. The costs of licensing any anti-cheat system long term, require a large paying playing MP Audience... :butbut: Edited August 3, 2009 by Hoak Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Defunkt 431 Posted August 3, 2009 I think what BI/ArmA II really need is a 'killer' MP game-mode or Mod, that is more accessible, offers more immediate appeal and gratification to those less versed in our favorite genre. It needs that anyway, funding anti-cheat is just one more reason why. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nuxil 2 Posted August 10, 2009 (edited) i rather have BE than PB in this game. BE worked fine in arma.. offcource BE or anyother anticheat will not help against a poorly set up server. example a server that allows unsigned addon.. i could easly made an addon that makes me imortal.. let me fly etc etc.. but for more advance cheats/hacks. we need BE.. +1 BE LOL: so far 18 Want ther server hacked :p Edited August 10, 2009 by nuxil Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dwarden 1125 Posted August 14, 2009 this is my persional opinion and nothing else : i think best would be to have PB, BE and VAC optionable for ARMA 2 where admin decides what and if he want use some anticheat next to signatures ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtec 0 Posted August 14, 2009 It seriously needs some form of anti cheating system as that does drive gamers away from public servers! Last week i witnessed 3 out of 5 games being hacked, bugged or whatever by some idiots who then eventually crashed the server! Its annoying that you could be playing for 2 hours and all that playing time is lost due to some moron who can pop up some silly scripts that kills everyone on screen! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites