GOLGO_13 10 Posted November 17, 2011 After doing some research about the GTXs 570 with 2.5GB VRam, I've found this one: http://www.fudzilla.com/reviews/item/24458-point-of-view-/24458-point-of-view-?start=1 Now I have to choose between the Point of View and EVGA models(and try to find it somewhere around here, lol!). Right now, I'm thinking about the Point of View model, because of the dual Zalman coolers. Any suggestions? :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
froggyluv 2136 Posted November 17, 2011 That POV Beast sounds impressive -can't find a seller anywhere in the states to compare prices but sounds like it it's maybe $100.00 more then a standard 570....thats getting pretty close to 580 :raisebrow: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
robmypro 10 Posted November 18, 2011 I found that the best performance improvements i saw were when i overclocked my i7 875k from 2.9 to 4ghz. That along with my ati 5850 running 1920x1080 is silky smooth. I have 8gb ram and run win 7 x64. But would my system even benefit from a faster gpu, and if so how much higher would i have to go? Would a second 5850 provide any benefit? I already have almost everything on very high. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leon86 13 Posted November 18, 2011 Would a second 5850 provide any benefit? I already have almost everything on very high. depends on settings and if the ati driver is any good with arma. Anyone running 5850 in crossfire? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grillob3 11 Posted November 22, 2011 Is it worth upgrading an i7 920 oc to 4.3 stable low temps to and i7 2600k , 2700k or an i7-3930K? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted November 22, 2011 (edited) For gaming - No. I have a 3930K and it does next to nothing where gaming is concerned (compared to the 980x) Edited November 22, 2011 by BangTail Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grillob3 11 Posted November 23, 2011 So for now am i good with my 920 4.3? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted November 23, 2011 Yep :) /10 chars Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GOLGO_13 10 Posted November 23, 2011 Hey guys! I'm ready to set up my CPU (2500k) and Mobo (Asus P8P67), but I'm not sure if I should use the stock cooler(a lot of people say it sucks, lol!). I'm not planning to OC right away, but I've been thinking about getting a Cooler Master 212 Plus. Would the 212 Plus and a thermal compound like ThermalTake TG-1 a good combination to keep the CPU in a safe temperature, even during the summer? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PuFu 4600 Posted November 23, 2011 yes. in fact even with the stock cooler you should be ok if you dont oc the cpu Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GOLGO_13 10 Posted November 23, 2011 Thanks for the quick answer! Is the stock cooler good enough to use the CPU @3.7 (2500K turbo mode)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted November 23, 2011 The stock cooler is pretty much a safe bet provided you aren't doing any off spec OCing (manual OCing). So it should be fine for turbo :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GOLGO_13 10 Posted November 23, 2011 Thanks!! I'll use the stock cooler with the ThermalTake TG-1 until I get a better cooler and start OCing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leon86 13 Posted November 24, 2011 The stock cooler has its own thermal compound already applied. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GOLGO_13 10 Posted November 24, 2011 It was actually funny when I got the 2500K, and was looking for a thermal compound syringe in the box, then I saw the gray stuff already on the cooler, LOL! :D Anyway, is the stock cooler thermal compound good to use when not OCing anything? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Leon86 13 Posted November 24, 2011 Of course, it's sufficient to keep the cpu within allowable temperatures in worst case conditions. The reason you want a big cooler if you want to overclock is you increase the voltage, cpu's degrade by a combination of high temperature with high voltage. Also, the increased voltage makes temperatures go up a lot (more than just speed increase). Making something run faster AND cooler than stock just requires a bit of cooling overkill, at stock the intel mini heatsink is sufficient. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GOLGO_13 10 Posted November 25, 2011 I assembled all the basic components(2500K(with stock cooler),Asus P8P67,2X4GB Corsair Vengeance 1600, and a weak 350W PSU to test my rig). Now I need to choose a GPU and PSU. The EVGA GTX 570 with 2.5GB of VRAM is the same price as a ECS GTX 580 1.5GB VRAM around here(and over my budget). Anyway, Arma demands a lot of VRAM, but would a MSI GTX 570 1.25GB Twin Frozr II screw up everything because it's lack of VRAM, or it's still possible to play without a lot of problems? (I can get the MSI 570 for a good price here, that's why I want to make sure if it's a good choice or not). About the PSU, I've been thinking about the Corsair GS800, but, which other PSU brands do you guys recomend? Thanks! :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted November 25, 2011 1.2GB is borderline OK but you may run into memory limitations depending on your resolution and detail settings. Corsair PSUs are fine :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SWAT_Glock 10 Posted November 25, 2011 (edited) I am in process of a new build. We'll see if there is any improvement. At 2560x1600 res. and I averaged 54FPS (AA off - VD 2600) OLD BUILD (no longer have it) Dell 30" U3011 Monitor Core i7-980X Gulftown 3.33GHz Six Core Corsair H50 CPU Cooler 12GB Corsair Dominator 1066 DDR3 (2GBx6) 240GB OCZ Vertex 2 SATA II SSD WD 600GB Storage HDD EVGA SuperClocked GeForce GTX 580 1536MB Corsair Professional Series Gold AX1200 PS Corsair 600T Case NEW BUILD Dell 30" U3011 Monitor Core i7-2600K Sandy Bridge 3.4GHz Quad Core Corsair H50 CPU Cooler 16GB Corsair Vengence 1600 DDR3 (4GBx4) 256GB Crucial M4 SATA III SSD WD 1TB Storage HDD EVGA GeForce GTX 580 Classified 3072MB Corsair Professional Series Gold AX1200 PS Corsair 600T Case Edited November 25, 2011 by SWAT_Glock typo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PuFu 4600 Posted November 25, 2011 I'm sorry, but why are you building a new rig? If the only reason is arma, then the improvement you'll notice will be minimal at best...if any Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SWAT_Glock 10 Posted November 25, 2011 I'm sorry, but why are you building a new rig? If the only reason is arma, then the improvement you'll notice will be minimal at best...if any No, Arma is not the only reason plus I should of mentioned that I no longer have the old system. :cool: It will be nice to see if the newer architecture, chipset, native SATA 3, and a 3GB video card make any difference at that res. Both CPUs can OC to about the same so I'll see if 4 vs 6 core make any diff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted November 26, 2011 3GB will help at 2560 x 1600. 1.5GB is nowhere near enough at that res with high detail/AA etc. There isn't going to be much difference between CPUs vis a vis ArmA 2 (except that the 2600K has more OCing overhead than the 980x). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SWAT_Glock 10 Posted November 26, 2011 I read that too, the 3GB allowing me to up the setting a bit at that res. I'll post the improvements (if any) once I get it together. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted November 26, 2011 (edited) I run at that res myself and I have seen video memory usage as high as 2.7GB. Hope you enjoy your new build :D Edited November 26, 2011 by BangTail Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SWAT_Glock 10 Posted November 26, 2011 Thanks. Nice Rigs BTW. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites