US M60A3 NATO camo Release

[hamis 0]

Well,what about adding random markings?

[rygugu 0]

Oh!!!

It is an unexpected bug.

Quote[/b] ]Quote (wipman @ April 26 2008,16:32)

Hi, im not sure if this should be as it's rightnow, but when the M60A3 goes by the field, the lower side of the tracks are completly sunk

into the ground, seems that it also happens in the roads and i think

that it shouldn't really be that way. But the update is good, now

the suspension it's better and the ammo and tank armour seems

more valanced in comparison with the BIS M1A1 and the T72 finding

a hole for the M60-A3 between this tanks. Let's C ya

...copy that... nice update, but tracks sunk into ground...

It seems not to lift any further up though it managed to correct.

Do you know the method of someone correcting this better?

The mistake that I violated is a thing to include the arm in the selection of the suspension. A correct selection might become only a tracks.

It includes it in the following update.

I think that it can bundle this.

I want you to wait for several weeks until completing it though it is thought that it takes.

[mechastalin 0]

I don't mind that bug that much, makes it seem like the track is actually digging into the ground offroad.

[Tawalkana 0]

this might be a bit ot, but I've read something about a M60-2000 or whatever it was caled, that has an Abrams turret mounted instead of the M60s, the company claims that the upgrade makes this tank 'nearly as capable as the M1A1' does anybody know something more concrete about that tank than these PR claims? and wouldn't that be a cool version to include in an update? p.s.: rygugu, for your next project I vote for T55, we need it!

I'm trying to figure out why currently we would need more variety at the tank position with us having 2 Russian tanks at our disposal. T-64 and T-72. T-80 and T-90 wont' be far. IMO there are many APC's that you could do out there such as LAV's or AAVP7 or MTLB. What do we have to compliment Johnny's Marines?

[ArmaVidz 0]

I'm trying to figure out why currently we would need more variety at the tank position with us having 2 Russian tanks at our disposal.  T-64 and T-72.  T-80 and T-90 wont' be far.  IMO there are many APC's that you could do out there such as LAV's or AAVP7 or MTLB.  What do we have to compliment Johnny's Marines?

I do believe your sentiment would be better appreciated in the A&M:REQUEST Thread

[buliwyf 4]

I don't mind that bug that much, makes it seem like the track is actually digging into the ground offroad.

For me it looks mostly like this:

...and that`s not really funny...  

[flv*venom* 83]

@Karaya: thx for the pic and the additional info, at the first look I thought it was an Abrams, lol.

[rygugu 0]

Hi

The problem that tracks sunk into ground was solved.

[wipman 1]

Hi, im glad to see that you've fixed the tracks little problem and

that that RACS M60A3 look very good in it's present state; i can

wait for it; looks very good. Let's C ya

[-Soviet- 0]

Hi,

(...) However, another vehicle is planned at present. It has not decided it yet though it thinks about T-55, LAV-25, and BTR-60, etc. More another thing might be made.  

... so dont blame me for giving my idea!

I'm trying to figure out why currently we would need more variety at the tank position with us having 2 Russian tanks at our disposal.  T-64 and T-72.  T-80 and T-90 wont' be far. (...)

I'm agree.

Let the T-55 to Project 85 and their great tanks maker Kenji.

A M48 could be more intersting for the seconds lines (Reserve) of the RACS amored unit.

M48 (infos)

Just an idea like that!

Good day!

-Soviet-

[Tawalkana 0]

I'm trying to figure out why currently we would need more variety at the tank position with us having 2 Russian tanks at our disposal. T-64 and T-72. T-80 and T-90 wont' be far. IMO there are many APC's that you could do out there such as LAV's or AAVP7 or MTLB. What do we have to compliment Johnny's Marines?

I do believe your sentiment would be better appreciated in the A&M:REQUEST Thread

You are dipping into the coolaid and you don't even know the flavor.

He stated he was going to work on something else after his M60 was done. We are giving him idea's on what the community would like to see. It doesn't matter what we want cause he is going have to do it. OH KAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[KastaRules 0]

The problem that tracks sunk into ground  was solved.

Good to know it! We'll wait for the HotFix

[miles teg 1]

The desert texture M60 looks very good. However, if possible could you include a texture with just a solid tan color. That is because for other addon makers to develop it into M60's for different countries (and different versions) it provides a solid color that is easier to modify then one with cammo on it (which is much harder to modify).

Then we will see more quickly USMC M60A3 with ERA and in Operation Desert Storm textures, Jordanian M60's, Turkish M60's, Egyptian M60's, etc...

Chris G.

aka-Miles Teg<GD>

[CameronMcDonald 146]

Miles - I do believe that's a RACS scheme, not just a generic desert scheme. I'd like to see what you suggest, however, in addition to the RACS paint (which I miss terribly at the moment).

[rygugu 0]

RACS Ver WIP

I want to release it on the next weekend.

Miles- It is considered to include the solid color texture.

However, if they need it for Mod team and an ADDON maker with an excellent technology, I will offer it pleasing my MLOD and the material such as PSD.

[CameronMcDonald 146]

Excellent! Is the South Sahrani flag stuck on it somewhere?

[Daniel 0]

Stick it on the mast!

Haha, looking awesome! Keep it up.

[sprite 0]

Looks good, I would add the blue and white cheverons as the m113 has - simply to match it.

[buliwyf 4]

The RACS version looks nice and is very useful for missions. And if someone needs a RACS flag on the tank, he should add it via setFlagOwner...

[CameronMcDonald 146]

Not a REAL flag, I mean the textured flag (see the right (left side of picture) side of the M113 - little SS flag there). Also agree about the chevron - the texture wouldn't be finished without it.

[rygugu 0]

Oh!! South Sahrani flag! It forgot.!!!

HaHaHa The texture is still incomplete.

I will surely add the blue and white cheverons and South Sahrani flag.

[icebreakr 3156]

We need a "rebel" version of that tank so please don't include sahrani flag if that is the only version of tank that is in the release.

[-Soviet- 0]

Hi,

Wow!

Your work is very impressive... and usefull!

Good work!

-Soviet-

[william1 0]

a RACS m60 ! that's exactly what south sahrani army needs

looking forward to it

[wipman 1]

Hi, im againist the use of the RACS chevron on the M60-A3 but

i do agree on that a small RACS flag on the sides of the turret will

look good and even realistic. The chevron on the M113's A3 i think

that's there thinking in the urban (guard) enviroments more than

in the open field and battlefield, it's noticeable from a big far away

distance and breaks complety the camo utitlity; something that in

a so tall and squared (and also well known) vehicles is very important

for the survavility of such pieces of iron. So... i vote "HELL NO!!" to

the use of the RACS chevron on the M60's A3, i already have to

stand it in the RACS M113's A3. Let's C ya