What computing system do you have for the Arma 3 Beta?

[vasmkd 12]

My current system for A3 is:

Asus Sabertooth z77

Intel Core i7 3770K

Corsair H70 Water Cooler with 2x Gentle typhoon ap-15's in push/pull

Gigabyte GeForce GTX OC 670 2GB

16GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 1600mhz (2x8GB)

750W Silverstone Strider Plus PSU

Seagate barracuda 2TB HD

240 gb Sandisk Extreme SSD

Antec eleven hundred case

Samsung 24" 1920x1200 monitor

Windows 7 Professional 64-bit

Runs pretty smooth with everything on atleast high at 1920x1200 resolution, havn't even bothered to OC the CPU yet

[xaysana 13]

Here's my specs:

Gigabyte z68p-ds3

Intel Core i5 2500

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 680 2gb windforce edition

16GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 1600mhz (2x8GB)

750W Silverstone Strider Plus PSU

240 gb Sandisk Extreme SSD

Coolermaster HAF 912 advanced case

Windows 7 Professional 64-bit

[BLACKHAWK1090 1]

Just finished, I may need to upgrade my graphics card soon :P

[DARKYAUTJA 0]

Done , i can run the alpha but i need to upgrade my pc , cheers !

Edited March 23, 2013 by DARKYAUTJA

[Sikulec 1]

Anybody here knows how it runs on GeForce GTX 260?

[Dafydd 1]

Running everything on ultra both online and throwing in lot's of ai and objects on the editor with no problems atm :) 1680x1050 btw This is only a taste of what's to come?

[Grafeen 1]

My setup for a while:

3570K @3.8 GHz

ASRock Z77 Extreme 4

DDR3 8GB

XFX 7850 2GB @975/1200 MHz

Dell U2412M @ 1920X1200

Samsung 830 128GB SSD (Win7 x64)

WD Caviar Blue 1TB HDD (for game)

[steve79 10]

My system is old compared to all yours p

Intel q6600 cpu overclocked to 2-8g

2 gigs ddr 400

Ati 4870 1gb.

Gotta be one of the oldest systems here lol

Plays the alpha pretty good tho

[Akrett 1]

My system, a bit older:

MB: asus M4N68T V2

CPU: Amd Phenom II x4 955 3,20ghz

GPU: msi GTX 460 1GB

DDR3 8GB RAM

can u tell me best choice to improve? better buy new gpu or processor? i heard arma3 is more cpu dependant. thx

[tremanarch 6]

not only new cpu - but cpu with hiiigh clock!

not so many cores - less heat higher clock.. 4 cores are enough for gaming overall.

[fabio_chavez 103]

My System Specs:

Intel Xeon X3220 2,4ghz OC @3,6ghz

4gb DDR2 1033mhz

AMD 6970 OC (power color PCS+)

SSD 256mb Corsair Neutron

Basic

-Resolution: 1920x1080x32

-Visibility: Overall: 1490 Vis: 1000 Shadow:70

Rendering:

-3D Resolution: 150%

-AA: Disabled

-PPAA: FXAA on standard

-ATOC: Disabled

Postprocesses:

-Quality: Disabled

-HDR: Standard

-Anisotropic Filtering: Very High

-PIP: Standard

-Dynamic Lights: Very High

Quality:

-Texture Detail: Ultra

-Object Quality: Low or Standard

-Terrain Quality: Ultra

-Cloud Quality: Ultra

-Shadow Quality: High

-Particles Quality: High

[pr0ph3tswe 1]

done :)

[sharpy 10]

Done it.....agree....feels like it already needs and upgrade. :(

[Rumpii 1]

GPU: AMD Radeon 6750m 1024 GDDR5 - 780 Core 825 mem

CPU: Core I7 2720QM

RAM: 8GB

HDD: Crucial m4 256gb SSD

The game runs surprisingly well, especially after yesterday's dev build update, 60 fps generally over the island, mix of standard and very high with low objects, dips to 36-40 in built up areas and areas with a lot of foliage, overall im happy!

[ravenmorpheus 1]

I can run most current games that I've tried at max settings with decent (50-60fps) framerates, mostly because they are console ports. Not the case in Arma III, nor Arma II/OA/ToH.

My specs, added to the list, I seem to be at the lower end of specs, but I can't afford an upgrade to an i5 or i7 and a current GPU. :(

AMD Phenom II x4 955 BE @3.2ghz

Sapphire Radeon HD 5870 1GB

1 TB HD Samsung 7200RPM

8 GB 1300 mhz DDR3 RAM

Windows 7 64bit

Hoping for some optimisations to be made so that my current settings run better, rather than the "tough, upgrade" attitude most developers have.

[tremanarch 6]

guys do you think arma profits from a good VGA with lots of VRAM?

at the moment I have 560ti with 1 GB VRAM (it only lets me picck high texture quality)

should I go for 2-3 or even 4 GB VRAM? does this even matter on a 1080p set up?

[tvamvarg 0]

Have a slightly older ASUS P5N-E, Intel Quad6600 @ 2,40GHz, 4 GB DDR2, Win7 32-bit and a 9600GT 512 MB on PCIe x16

It runs Arma III, which I'm happy for, but of course I'd like to optimise a bit. The settings are pretty low, I'm currently at 1280x1024x32, Standard quality for everything, no AA, no PPAA, ATOC or AF, Low HDR, Low post process.

I have a spare SSD which I can move my Steam installation to (the stupid ASUS MB wont boot from an SSD, sadly). Not expecting huge benefits from that though other than loading speeds :) Buying a new rig won't happen for a while. But I could spend $150 or so on a GTX650Ti for example. Would that give me a more beautiful game, but not very much faster in terms of FPS? Any better way to up the performance of the game while on a budget?

[Bravo_Two_Zeroq 10]

Best bet would be to upgrade graphics indeed while on a budget, although you can also look for cards below $100 (HD 7750 for example) for an upgrade which is already substantially faster than your GeForce 9600GT. If you have the money, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is currently good value for money and at the top of your budget.

[tvamvarg 0]

The 7750 sounds like the perfect upgrade for me, low-power is an extra (for heat and noise, I have a 650W PSU so should handle most cards)

Much appreciated!

[EuroSlave 1]

Currently a sandy bridge 2600, gtx 670 with a light OC, 4 gigs of dominator ram, vertex 4 256gig SSD.

Runs good at all settings on high @ 1920x1200 but will upgrade to 16 gigs ram/better cpu/gpu @ full release.

[Tray 1]

MSI GTX7980DX:

CPU i7-2670QM

VGA NVIDIA GTX570M (1.5GB GDDR5)

RAM DDRIII 16GB (4GB*4)

[Say0n 1]

Hello Guys,

Currently running arma iii mostly in medium setting with the following specs

MB MSI Z68 platform

i5 2500k@4.3ghz

8GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance 9-9-9-24

HD 7200rpm 500GB

HD6870 Crossfire

850W PSU

Samsung monitor 120hz

Edited April 3, 2013 by Say0n

[Hodgy 1]

I7 980x cpu

Msi GTX 680 lightning graphics card

Asus R3E Motherboard

Playing on high without to much problems

[pvtdancer 5]

Mah Sig :D

[gossamersolid 155]

guys do you think arma profits from a good VGA with lots of VRAM?

at the moment I have 560ti with 1 GB VRAM (it only lets me picck high texture quality)

should I go for 2-3 or even 4 GB VRAM? does this even matter on a 1080p set up?

What do you mean it only lets you pick high?

I have the same card and I can pick the ultra setting (or whatever the highest one is)