Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
ArmAriffic

ArmA 2 site hacked

Recommended Posts

erhm do i read correct no XP supported? :s

After more than 10 years it's not really surprising...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
XP doesn't support DX10 +, guess that's the real reason there

*grabs torch and fork follows 4IN1*

Ok that sucks that means i need to buy win7 because vista is not comming on my pc and it does not come cheap here :butbut: pffft ok luckely i have some time to figure it all out to get it strait.

After more than 10 years it's not really surprising...

hmmm mkay but i"m not the whelty you know, i mean it is a processor upgrade video card upgrade and a sytem upgrade i'm looking at 600 to 800 euro's here for the 3th time, its just i hope i am able to get it all so i can play it because i really don't want to miss out on ArmA3

kind regards

Edited by KBourne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, judging by the screens, I'm guessing we still get to see Takistan and, maybe, Chernarus? I know I see Takistan in two of those screens, screens 5 and 9: http://www.arma3.com/screenshots/scr05.jpg

http://www.arma3.com/screenshots/scr09.jpg

possibly in screens 6 and 7 as well: http://www.arma3.com/screenshots/scr06.jpg http://www.arma3.com/screenshots/scr07.jpg

Edited by antoineflemming

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, this isn't about not owning a shitty nVidia card because I never will again, they are awful cards. It's just pathetic they have several open platforms available to them to provide enhanced physics features for EVERYBODY but instead they decide to go with the cockblocking singular company route and shits on half or more of their fanbase.

You just don't get it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, this isn't about not owning a shitty nVidia card because I never will again, they are awful cards. It's just pathetic they have several open platforms available to them to provide enhanced physics features for EVERYBODY but instead they decide to go with the cockblocking singular company route and shits on half or more of their fanbase.

Did your house burn down or something because of the Nvidia card you were using?

A little bit extreme there me thinks mate...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You just don't get it...

Then explain it to me professor :)

Did your house burn down or something because of the Nvidia card you were using?

A little bit extreme there me thinks mate...

Extreme for disliking a crappy physics feature? Yes, EXTREME.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Again, given that they have been using PhysX in VBS2 for some time now, it is logical that they will choose a system that they are familiar with

*Start running for hard cover*

I see what you did there :bounce3:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i guess a dx9 exe is not possible? do other dx10 games allow dx9 too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Then explain it to me professor :)

Extreme for disliking a crappy physics feature? Yes, EXTREME.

YOU DO NOT NEED A NVIDIA CARD TO RUN PHYSX

Your shitty ATI card will work just fine.... Physx is just an engine and not mandatory to be used on nvidia hardware...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, judging by the screens, I'm guessing we still get to see Takistan and, maybe, Chernarus? I know I see Takistan in two of those screens, screens 5 and 9: http://www.arma3.com/screenshots/scr05.jpg

http://www.arma3.com/screenshots/scr09.jpg

possibly in screen 6 as well: http://www.arma3.com/screenshots/scr06.jpg

99% sure that isn't Takistan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
YOU DO NOT NEED A NVIDIA CARD TO RUN PHYSX

Your shitty ATI card will work just fine.... Physx is just an engine and not mandatory to be used on nvidia hardware...

exactly this!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unnecessary abusive post deleted and infraction given - Placebo.

Edited by Placebo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To PhysX: "Take advantage of PhysXâ„¢ supported vehicle simulation". I think we'll get this PhysX vehicle stuff from VBS. So don't worry ATI owners, the game will probably run fine on ATI and AMD GPU's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
YOU DO NOT NEED A NVIDIA CARD TO RUN PHYSX

Your shitty ATI card will work just fine.... Physx is just an engine and not mandatory to be used on nvidia hardware...

Still need an upgrade my nvidea will be to low for that game :p it was maxed out just for arma2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG i'm really happy now. Saving some money to get it on Pre Order

"The revamped animation system" really looking foward to see its working the CoD and BF fanboys wont be able to bash arma anymore.The only think they had as argument was aways the crap animation.

Physx is "meh" for me, aways gave me more problem's than a good feature, so switched to ATI and wont be back so soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Khaos[=-;1928306']exactly this!

+1

So' date=' judging by the screens, I'm guessing we still get to see Takistan and, maybe, Chernarus? I know I see Takistan in two of those screens, screens 5 and 9: [url']http://www.arma3.com/screenshots/scr05.jpg[/url]

http://www.arma3.com/screenshots/scr09.jpg

possibly in screen 6 as well: http://www.arma3.com/screenshots/scr06.jpg

That definitely isnt Takistan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let Placebo finish the section!!!!

you mean that it's not possible to post? Didn't try, to be honest.

EDIT: yes, you are right, it's not possible. Sorry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Sethos about his reasons for disliking the choice of PhysX.

Many games use Physx for unimportant things, just to add a bit of eyecandy (Arkham Asylum, you get Batman's cape moving in the breeze, Cryostasis, you get some water effects).

If elements like environmental destructibility, vehicle handling or ballistics make use of Physx, on the other-hand, half Bis' customer base are shafted, as game performance will suffer massively. Either there's a tick-box option that means we can switch off those elements of the game, or they're handled on the CPU and we lose 15 FPS whatever our system specs.

Sure, it's understandable Bis will use a tech they can recycle from another project. However, I'd like to know which elements of the game will rely on PhysX. If there are too many, I'll simply be sticking with Arma 2. Alienating half your customer base is not a sound commercial decision.

I hope I'm overreacting, and PhysX will only be used for a simple graphical effect. We'll see as more about the game is revealed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know if that is HMS Astutes ass at the top of the diver picture?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

from gamershell:

Arma 3 will be featured in private presentations at the Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) June 7th-9th. Bohemia Interactive will be located in the South Hall in booth #2803

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Still need an upgrade my nvidea will be to low for that game :p it was maxed out just for arma2

I'm not 100% on this, but I'm sure I read somewhere that you can have a second nVidia card just to shovel PhysX onto. No reason why you couldn't have ATI + older nVidia card just to handle PhysX

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×