k0rd

This looks really great. Really excited to check it out.

Its been unusable for a few stable iterations now. It is just strange that some channels work but side is hosed. I imagine there is already a ticket but I didn't check.

This solved the problem for me: Go to Start > Run and type in: regedit. Navigate to: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Valve\Steam\. Create a new string value registry setting named CafeRate. Give the CafeRate regkey a value of 10000 and progressively decrease the value until the issue is resolved. A rate of 3000 should be considered the minimum value.

FWIW, I've experienced the sound portion of this bug in stable.

having this issue too - have you found a fix?

nevermind...

nevermind, sorry. I am having the same issue in stable that recently started up though.

I have a question - and this might just be my error. With this mod (and deps) installed, I can't place empty bluefor/nato armor (the vanilla assets) from the editor. Is this something correctable? I like to use the editor to make quick scenarios- would be nice to place empty armor.

I think the point here is that blastcore wasn't "made from scratch". The author cannot change the terms of the license of constituent code.

*shrug* you are the one who came here ranting and raving about needing permission for code that is already licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL by somebody else (assuming that the github contributor above is correct in saying that CBA is GNU GPL) . It appears that any moderation that needs to be done has already been done. [edit] also, if something is released into the public domain without a specific license, what do you think the legal status of that something is? it has been brought to my attention that optical licensed this under a general "no you can't edit/distribute" statement. The only question now is: what are the terms of the constituent 3rd party scripts/configs/art that are contained within blastcore? [edit 2] I don't use this mod, I don't really care if it succeeds or if it fails. I have no connection to the person who is releasing the updated version - never once have I discussed anything with him directly or indirectly. As someone who writes mods for this and other games, I find it disconcerting that somebody can take an old, defunct mod.. repackage it with new classnames, distribute it, then try to deny others the exact same right they were afforded. It seems disingenuous (at best). The list of contributors (unthanked, by the way) that you can gather simply by looking at this mod is lengthy. This isn't one guy's work, but a community effort. I don't care that he is asking for donations, he deserves them if somebody feels he deserves them. What I do care about is this attitude that someone can basically take a bunch of people's work.. put it all together (granted, with some new work added), then claim to have some sort of exclusivity over the resulting codebase. It really goes against the community spirit - and likely the spirit of the original author's permission.

and what were the terms of this agreement? I find it hard to believe that a community-friendly contributor such as maddmatt would say : you can use my code, lock it down, and not let anyone access the derivative work/

since blastcore appears to be (at least in part) using old code from maddmatt's ArmAEffects mod, I think that all of this hatred for HJohnson is misplaced.

If I were you, I'd just put a hint format["_oldunit = %1",_oldunit]; in there to see what the var looks like.

hey guys - sounds like you both still are experiencing part of this bug. Could you (and anyone else still experiencing the problem) update the thread with what missions/mods you are seeing the error with, and any steps that can be taken to reproduce it? It seems like most of the error is fixed but there may still be some edge-cases left to clean up.

it was fine for us on dev.. havent had a chance to try stable yer

try it with nowp - they may be moving out of those positions before you are verifying them

this really seems like a version issue also reposting the link so people can click it easier : http://puu.sh/8YPWm/7979813ece.jpg ---------- Post added at 12:16 ---------- Previous post was at 12:15 ---------- not true, the opposite is the case ( i remember telling you that in another thread )

I'm pretty proud of myself for not preordering this one. I may get it if it ever goes on sale, but it just doesn't seem that good.

it would be great to have a description.ext option: restrictUniforms=0 or something.

You may just have to do an ugly hack and setpos the unit for the first spawn (set a variable so that you know you've done the initial spawn at this point) Also, I've had lots of problems with the MenuPosition template - but I was also adding spawnpoints on the fly in the mission.

I think it is hilarious that these types of servers enforce laws by kicking/banning. People get sick of playing under some oppressive laws - so they start their own life server up so they can be the cops. Then, they can't enforce their rules because they are (invariably) scrubs, so they kick the good criminals out instead of trying to capture/contain them. end result: 20000 empty life servers.. each one of them with an artificial 'admin police force'.

I wouldn't hold your breath for a fix on the disappearing map and lack of GPS coords - unless I am misunderstanding what you are reporting. This is almost certainly a mission/mod issue.

pretty subjective- so I'll try to refrain from opinion (and bias) and let you know some of the things you might consider You should consider whether or not you are willing to install a mod (not always the best option if you are making a mission intended for public play) You should consider what things you want to change about AI (make them more cohesive as a whole army, modify individual combat behavior, etc) You should consider whether or not you need included features other than AI (UPSMON, for example, will take care of many things like reinforcements, spawning AI in building positions, and other things) You should consider the (computation) cost of the script - AI is already an FPS killer without modifications, it isn't far fetched to assume that loading even more intelligence will cause even more lag. So if you could narrow down your request, maybe someone in here could point you in the right direction. There are many different AI mods, each of them good and bad at certain things.

are you using any mods>

It is easy enough to see whether or not your cores are parking. The CPU tab in resource monitor (task manager -> performance tab -> hit the resource monitor button-> cpu tab) will show you in real-time. Any parked cores will be marked 'parked' and you will not see activity on them. After using this method, you'll want to start arma with the new -EnableHT flag, and you will want to remove any -cpucount or cpu related options from your command line as well. You should see significant activity across all of your cores when the game is running :)