PainDealer 0 Posted January 17, 2005 Quote[/b] ]Pentagon Spurned Plan to Initiate Enemy HomosexualityBy Jim Wolf WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. military rejected a 1994 proposal to develop an "aphrodisiac" to spur homosexual activity among enemy troops but is hard at work on other less-than-lethal weapons, defense officials said Sunday. The idea of fostering homosexuality among the enemy figured in a declassified six-year, $7.5 million request from a laboratory at Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio for funding of non-lethal chemical weapon research. The proposal, disclosed in response to a Freedom of Information request, called for developing chemicals affecting human behavior "so that discipline and morale in enemy units is adversely affected." "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior," said the document, obtained by the Sunshine Project. The watchdog group posted the partly blacked-out, three-page document on its Web site. Lt. Col. Barry Venable of the Army, a Defense Department spokesman, said: "This suggestion arose essentially from a brainstorming session, and it was rejected out of hand." The Air Force Research Laboratory also suggested using chemicals that could be sprayed on enemy positions to attract stinging and biting bugs, rodents and larger animals. Another idea involved creating "severe and lasting halitosis" to help sniff out fighters trying to blend with civilians. The U.S. military remains committed to developing less-than-lethal weapons that pass stringent legal reviews and are consistent with international treaties, said Captain Dan McSweeny of the Marine Corps, a spokesman for the Pentagon unit spearheading their introduction. "We feel it's very important to offer our deployed service members and their commanders a greater range of options in dealing with increasingly complex operational environments," said McSweeny, of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate. Source Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DarkLight 0 Posted January 17, 2005 Holy shit! I'd rather have nervegas than that! No actually this is scary Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted January 17, 2005 Why not just spray the joint with laughing gas or Viagra mist? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gandalf the white 0 Posted January 17, 2005 Okay... I wouln't even wanna watch that weapon go to work Oh man, maybe i do want to get an office job afterall... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
llauma 0 Posted January 17, 2005 Oh my.. I guess things might turn nasty when dropping a sexbomb on the battlefield. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
red oct 2 Posted January 17, 2005 i just hope they don't give this weapon to the airforce. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sanctuary 19 Posted January 17, 2005 I don't know if this is some kind of military joke, but maybe it will give a new meaning to friendly fire. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gollum1 0 Posted January 17, 2005 You just can't make this stuff up. Drop the bomb... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wolfy 0 Posted January 17, 2005 havent they tested this on the navy? ooh sailor Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stevevcb 3 Posted January 17, 2005 Oh dear. A less lethal buy more disgusting way to get shot in the back Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Friedchiken 0 Posted January 17, 2005 And with foriegn ignorance in extremely "pious" countries, I'm sure that the "lethal" part would come from all the executions and lynchings for being "indecent." (j/k) Seriously though, it makes you wonder if the developers and thinkers of this idea have serious misunderstandings about the homo-sexual community. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tovarish 0 Posted January 18, 2005 Am I the only one thinking this might lead to desertions amongst some members of the U.S. military? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
desantnik 0 Posted January 18, 2005 or increased recruitment from select members of the population. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ozanzac 0 Posted January 18, 2005 Quote[/b] ]This suggestion arose essentially from a brainstorming session, and it was rejected out of hand." ROFLMAO! I bet they had quite the brainstorming 'session' to come up with that idea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cozza 24 Posted January 18, 2005 the plan is gay i hate to be the person they test it on Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ares1978 0 Posted January 18, 2005 What if you get captured by sprayed troops? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cozza 24 Posted January 18, 2005 then god help the captured people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sputnik monroe 102 Posted January 18, 2005 It definitly wouldn't be a last resort weapon. Can you imagine the horror? You're surrounded and out numbered 100 to 1, so your commander orders this gas weapon used on the enemy. The moment the enemy charged after being gassed with that, well I'd probably just shoot my self. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ares1978 0 Posted January 18, 2005 It definitly wouldn't be a last resort weapon. Can you imagine the horror? You're surrounded and out numbered 100 to 1, so your commander orders this gas weapon used on the enemy. The moment the enemy charged after being gassed with that, well I'd probably just shoot my self. What if it works the other way around? You're surrounded and outnumbered by 100:1, and your commander orders you to use it on yourselves and do a counterattack. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PainDealer 0 Posted January 18, 2005 I think this one will give a new meaning to "drill sergeant" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ares1978 0 Posted January 18, 2005 I think this one will give a new meaning to "drill sergeant" What about "staff sargeant" or "rear admiral"? Or "lance corporal"? What the hell? Apparently there are such things as "Rear Admiral, Lower Half" and "Rear Admiral, Upper Half". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Necromancer- 0 Posted January 19, 2005 Very useful to eliminate the Iranian army... Hence homo-sexuality is forbidden by their stupid Sharia law and punished with death. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PainDealer 0 Posted January 19, 2005 rock on! no need for animal testing :P test it on em Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
