Us presidential election 2004

[Pathy 0]

I hope your right bern....i suspect there will be weeks of accusations of fraud ect before we get a proper result though....

[Blake 0]

Its close in Russia 47% Bush 44%Kerry

Yeah and whopping 43 votes by Russian voters overall...

[Cpt. Bazikian-5thSFG- 0]

I think Bush will get re-elected..... Call it a gut feeling

[Bordoy 0]

@ Nov. 02 2004,22:26)]I think Bush will get re-elected..... Call it a gut feeling    

http://electoral-vote.caida.org/

look at this, looks good as map. lol

Look closer towards end of october and begining of November. They keep going up down up down for each candidate and Bush is on the up day and Kerry is on a down day.

[Colossus 2]

@ Nov. 03 2004,00:26)]I think Bush will get re-elected..... Call it a gut feeling    

Have the feeling that this is gone go bad, for the Kerry voters... and the rest of the world... at least me

Last call:

Go Kerry

[Akira 0]

Quote[/b] ]Because now we don't know where Osama is whereas in the Clinton administration we knew exactly where he was and our resolve was to send a cruise missile as a early christmas present to him....Which unfourtunatly for the US public and the sep. 11 victims didn't work out the way they wanted to.

You mean we don't know where Osama is because Bush screwed up the Afghanistan invasion, and then re-focused to Iraq.

[Colossus 2]

@ Nov. 03 2004,00:34)]heh, double post  

Thx, but I noticed.

No need to post

Added:

Quote[/b] ]Because now we don't know where Osama is whereas in the Clinton administration we knew exactly where he was and our resolve was to send a cruise missile as a early christmas present to him....Which unfourtunatly for the US public and the sep. 11 victims didn't work out the way they wanted to.

You mean we don't know where Osama is because Bush screwed up the Afghanistan invasion, and then re-focused to Iraq.

Iraq was his mission all along, but Osama at that time was threat and he needed people stand beside him.

[Acecombat 0]

Interesting to note this

Quote[/b] ]

IRAQI result from that site:

BUSH: 41 Votes

43%

KERRY: 51 Votes

54%

They love him?

They love him not?

[Cpt. Bazikian-5thSFG- 0]

Quote[/b] ]Because now we don't know where Osama is whereas in the Clinton administration we knew exactly where he was and our resolve was to send a cruise missile as a early christmas present to him....Which unfourtunatly for the US public and the sep. 11 victims didn't work out the way they wanted to.

You mean we don't know where Osama is because Bush screwed up the Afghanistan invasion, and then re-focused to Iraq.

no, we don't know where Osama is becasue Clinton farcked up a good chance to take him out and after that cruise missile attack, he's been hiding ever since

[m21man 0]

Quote[/b] ]I think Bush will get re-elected..... Call it a gut feeling

I think Kerry will be elected, mainly because I bet $25 on a Bush victory.

[Cpt. Bazikian-5thSFG- 0]

so you want to loose 25 dollars?

[Akira 0]

@ Nov. 02 2004,23:41)]

Quote[/b] ]Because now we don't know where Osama is whereas in the Clinton administration we knew exactly where he was and our resolve was to send a cruise missile as a early christmas present to him....Which unfourtunatly for the US public and the sep. 11 victims didn't work out the way they wanted to.

You mean we don't know where Osama is because Bush screwed up the Afghanistan invasion, and then re-focused to Iraq.

no, we don't know where Osama is becasue Clinton farcked up a good chance to take him out and after that cruise missile attack, he's been hiding ever since

No....we knew he was in Afghanistan. What better way to capture him then finish the job.....IN IRAQ???

[igor drukov 0]

I find it quite puzzling to see so many non-Americans committing themselves to those elections. IMHO they'd better use their energy to empower their own zones of influence, so as to counter-balance the US of A, which they disagree with so passionately.

I am French. I like Kerry way better than Bush, but it does not matter.

I think the best part of America is that which is open to the rest of the world. The world must reach out for this part, and not turn its back on it, whoever is elected.

Noone never makes mistakes. I can't help thinking we are all lucky that the most powerful nation is concerned with guaranteeing individual liberties, and lets its people vote.

P.S. : General Barron for President  

[Cpt. Bazikian-5thSFG- 0]

@ Nov. 02 2004,23:41)]

Quote[/b] ]Because now we don't know where Osama is whereas in the Clinton administration we knew exactly where he was and our resolve was to send a cruise missile as a early christmas present to him....Which unfourtunatly for the US public and the sep. 11 victims didn't work out the way they wanted to.

You mean we don't know where Osama is because Bush screwed up the Afghanistan invasion, and then re-focused to Iraq.

no, we don't know where Osama is becasue Clinton farcked up a good chance to take him out and after that cruise missile attack, he's been hiding ever since

No....we knew he was in Afghanistan. What better way to capture him then finish the job.....IN IRAQ???

so, are you saying that because Clinton.....The one that the liberals look to as a guide farcked up his chance to stop Osama by not sending in a team to take him out, made it very difficult to find Osama becasue not only is he afraid of being cruise missiled again, but now he has to worry about US forces finding his hiding place. So instead you place the blame on Bush becasue the man is already incredibly difficult to find even prior to 9/11? I think you need to get your logic straight. We probrably wouldn't have had this mess if Clinton wasn't such a cocky president that thought one missile strike would take out Osama Bin Laden. Please, I call that arrogance on Mr. Clinton's behalf.

[Pathy 0]

LOL ace....bear in mind those are the only 92 iraqis WITH an internet connection....

[Pathy 0]

Ermm forget what Clinton did or didnt do, it still doesnt change the fact that Bush hasnt found him despite swearing to track him down, and has now moved on to a war with IRAQ! A place that has nothing to do with Bin Laden....

[Acecombat 0]

LOL ace....bear in mind those are the only 92 iraqis WITH an internet connection....

yeah and plenty of them are probably US residents right now

Pathy why not pas the buck even back why stop at clinton ? I mean lets go and blame Brezhnev if he hadnt invaded Afghanistan Laden wouldnt have become militant , NOW ITS ALL HIS FAULT . Damn you brezhnev.

[Cpt. Bazikian-5thSFG- 0]

Maybe Bush payed Osama off to conduct the Sept. 11 attacks and once Bush had the vengence of the American public on his side he went after Osama, which ticked off Osama..... Who got Bush to go for saddam by telling Bush that Saddam has WMD's that Saddam was willing to sell to Osama

[Blake 0]

Quote[/b] ]The one that the liberals look to as a guide farcked up his chance to stop Osama by not sending in a team to take him out

There are always severe risks sending teams into enemy-controlled territory however good the intelligence and planning is - if something would have gone wrong there it would have been a political disaster comparable to disgrace of failed rescue effort of US hostages in Tehran in 1980 or Somalia in 1993. No president would have taken that risk back then when Osama was not considered such a risk. Saying that Clinton was responsible is just useless historical what-if guessing. There were no realistic other options back then, I'm sure you realize this. Reality does not work like Chuck Norris movie. Or can you recall any politician/military leader back then who was demanding troops to be sent there?

Quote[/b] ]So instead you place the blame on Bush becasue the man is already incredibly difficult to find even prior to 9/11?

If your main objective is to capture Osama Bin Laden wouldn't you agree that having majority of the troops bogged in Iraq is not helping to achieve this goal? The focus has clearly shifted

since the Iraq incursion began.

[Pathy 0]

Yeh damn Brezhnev! What was he thinking when he invaded afganistan? Nah thats not good enough, lets blame Bin Ladens parents.....DAMN WHY DIDNT YOU WEAR CONTRACEPTION THAT FATEFULL NIGHT!!!!

[denoir 0]

FOX News had 34 electoral votes for Bush a minute ago, now they removed them. Damn, I was just about to take a screenshot and ask why CNN had not started counting.

FOX called Indiana, Kentucky and Georgia for Bush. Now it's gone.. Odd.

[Blake 0]

They were probably mixing it with Senate seats or something by accident since there are 34 at stake, 34 undecided

[denoir 0]

No, it was the electoral votes 11 (IN) + 8 (KY) + 15 (GA)

[Harnu 0]

FOX News had 34 electoral votes for Bush a minute ago, now they removed them. Damn, I was just about to take a screenshot and ask why CNN had not started counting.

FOX called Indiana, Kentucky and Georgia for Bush. Now it's gone..   Odd.

AFAIK, Most of the news stations are holding off until each states polls close to disclose and amounts. They want to try and prevent something like last year when everyone rushed results, and then Florida got caught in the wash.

[Apollo 0]

Ok ,as most Europeans it's now about time to go asleep ,and withing 8 hours a few 100's millions of European's will stand up ,check their tv or internet and say ,Yipee ,or .... Nooooo!

Hopefully Kerry will have won when i have awakened ,although i don't exclude the "3 weeks in court" scenario.