mistyronin 1181 Posted June 13, 2015 Aren't the US-faction's UCP and OCP units mixed up' date=' as in a way woodland sub-section is now represented by desert UCP units, where those are supposed to be wearing OCP, and vice-versa?(I thought that in real life the US Army was to switch over to OCP/MTP esque camouflage anyways?) But thanks for your enormous effort, and concern giving clarity over this little matter.) :)[/quote'] As today the official camo for the US Army is the UCP (it's used in most of the World). The OCP / MTP has been given to troops deployed in A-Stan (that's why it's in the desert section). This july the OCP will become official: (Army Times) Camo update: New ACUs hit store shelves July 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rovka 14 Posted June 13, 2015 As today the official camo for the US Army is the UCP (it's used in most of the World). The OCP / MTP has been given to troops deployed in A-Stan (that's why it's in the desert section). I see, well I didn't knew that was the case, as I thought UCP to be discarded from official use. Anyways, thanks for the quick answer! :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Soviet_Union 10 Posted June 13, 2015 thats not the wiki though, its just a list of class names Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mistyronin 1181 Posted June 13, 2015 thats not the wiki though, its just a list of class names Well take it that the former Documentation (Wiki) now is divided in 4 different parts: FAQ, Wiki, Classes and Updaters for faster use :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HitmanTwoActual 188 Posted June 13, 2015 I may just be blind but how do we use the new OGPK? My unit is really anxious to use it so our gunners don't get picked off :confused: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Soviet_Union 10 Posted June 13, 2015 Well take it that the former Documentation (Wiki) now is divided in 4 different parts: FAQ, Wiki, Classes and Updaters for faster use :) aw man that really sucks. I have no clue what these individual class names do and the old wiki really solved that problem, identifying them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bydax 12 Posted June 14, 2015 3BM42M is avaiable for our tanks we have it in the configs. 3БМ-59/60 «Svinec-1/2» for T-72BA/B3/B3M, T-80BA*/UE-1 and T-90A? *T-80BV after repair with modernization. MoD signed a contract for 600 units in 2014 (?). http://sa.uploads.ru/Ra5Dk.jpg (216 kB) http://photocdn3.itar-tass.com/width/744_b12f2926/tass/m2/uploads/i/20150222/3960886.jpg (142 kB) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Frogman 0 Posted June 14, 2015 I may just be blind but how do we use the new OGPK? My unit is really anxious to use it so our gunners don't get picked off :confused: Need help with this aswell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
soul_assassin 1750 Posted June 14, 2015 aw man that really sucks. I have no clue what these individual class names do and the old wiki really solved that problem, identifying them. classnames directly in wiki were impossible to maintain, we have way too much stuff for one person to keep track of. Hence the seperation. The class reference is now generated automatically. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bkktmkkt 24 Posted June 14, 2015 3БМ-59/60 «Svinec-1/2» for T-72BA/B3/B3M, T-80BA*/UE-1 and T-90A?*T-80BV after repair with modernization. MoD signed a contract for 600 units in 2014 (?). http://sa.uploads.ru/Ra5Dk.jpg (216 kB) http://photocdn3.itar-tass.com/width/744_b12f2926/tass/m2/uploads/i/20150222/3960886.jpg (142 kB) "svinec" (1 or 2) is 3bm48 http://cs7002.vk.me/c323229/v323229491/ae47/iWHW476sq-Y.jpg (104 kB) (FCS of 2s25) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bydax 12 Posted June 14, 2015 "svinec" (1 or 2) is 3bm48 3БМ-48 «Svinec» - 1991 3БМ-59/60 «Svinec-1/2» in production since 2013. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bkktmkkt 24 Posted June 14, 2015 3БМ-48 «Svinec» - 19913БМ-59/60 «Svinec-1/2» in production since 2013. Where did you take this indexes(i mean 3bm59/60)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bydax 12 Posted June 14, 2015 (edited) where did you take this indexes Alexey Khlopotov aka Gur Khan: Can use an ammunition 3ВБМ22 with APFSDS 3БМ59 «Svinec-1» (Svinec- Lead ) and 3ВБМ23 with APFSDS 3БМ60 «Svinec-2» and a throwing charge 4Ж96 "Ozone-T". Length of the core approximately 740мм. Russian: 1,2. Edited June 14, 2015 by Bydax Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VolkerMcFolke 10 Posted June 14, 2015 How do we use the ballistic missile launchers for the Russians? Whenever I spawned it in Zeus it doesnt give me an option at all to operate it when im a gunner or driver or whatever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
evromalarkey 150 Posted June 14, 2015 So I made improved version of RHS Merge config by Rydygier. If anyone want RHS editor structure more Arma 2 like here is the link - GOOGLE DRIVENow it also changes vehicleClass to BI standart and changes name for every vehicle, so there are no duplicates and it's easier to navigate in editor and zeus. Also done for USAF, this config requires both mods. In editor it looks this way: [table=width: 1200] [tr] [td][/td] [td][/td] [/tr] [/table] Updated to RHS 0.3.8, btw my old version could also causing problems with the missing M240 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
h-singh 39 Posted June 14, 2015 I cannot see my lovely RHS MK18... what happened??? :o: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redphoenix 1540 Posted June 14, 2015 I cannot see my lovely RHS MK18... what happened??? :o: Read the pages before please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
h-singh 39 Posted June 14, 2015 Read the pages before please. Sorry for that Sir. Unable to find the link, can you please share the link...:o Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sargken 286 Posted June 14, 2015 How does the OGPK work for armored turret. People have been asking and no one has an answer? Its alot nicer for humvees if its what its for. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mistyronin 1181 Posted June 14, 2015 Sorry for that Sir. Unable to find the link, can you please share the link...:o Better than that, I've written a new question in the F.A.Q, so it will be easy to check for everyone :) What happened to the things which were in the mod (Mk18, M4 Block II, etc.), but aren't at the moment?As today, our main focus of attention are regular US & Russian Armed Forces' units and their equipment. Our goal is to bring high quality content for the OFP / Arma series, so the former US Spec. Ops. content that didn't meet our quality standards has been hidden (though it will still work if you had it in your missions and you can still spawn it using the class-names in our website). Check the full RHS F.A.Q Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
h-singh 39 Posted June 14, 2015 Thanks for the info Sir, but when I see the change log 2 days ago I didn't see anything mentioned that Team removed the MK-18, M4.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PuFu 4600 Posted June 14, 2015 Thanks for the info Sir, but when I see the change log 2 days ago I didn't see anything mentioned that Team removed the MK-18, M4.. because it isn't removed, it is hidden Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nummi 12 Posted June 14, 2015 because it isn't removed, it is hidden Tomato Tomato :D Really loving everything in the latest update, thank you so much everyone in the RHS crew! Will most likely set aside some money from my next paycheck and donate, you guys deserve every reward possible for this 1st class mod. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyprus 16 Posted June 14, 2015 I've noticed that on all M240 variants your left hand is placed right where the magazine is, leading to some clipping errors. The M240B and M240G also have invisible magazines. The only thing showing up is a small part of the belt that feeds into where the magazine is supposed to be. The magazine is showing up on the M240B (CAP), but the 50 round mag is the same size as the 100 round mag. Is this intentional? Also, I've noticed that the 9K38 doesn't produce any lock-on warnings on the AH-64. Are lock-on missile launcher supposed to produce lock-on warnings on air vehicles? Lastly, is it ok if I report stuff here, or is it better to use the feedback tracker? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redphoenix 1540 Posted June 14, 2015 Is this intentional? WIP? Lastly, is it ok if I report stuff here, or is it better to use the feedback tracker? Make an educated guess... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites