Next patch wish list

[Gremlin 0]

It seems most of these suggestions should be posted/voted for on the Arm2 Community Issues Tracker to have any real impact on game development and referral to BIS. Maybe I missed something here?

[Gunter Severloh 4067]

Already in the tracker but we really need this.

Make groups selectable to be made playable in the editor

A feature where in the editor you select groups or more AI and make them playable all at once instead of individually editing each unit,

and all done by drawing a box around them to highlight them.

This has already been suggested, just want to remind to not forget.

[coopr 10]

Why should there be voted on cit to see real impact. Like bis cares how much people voted. The most wanted list hasn't changed for years. And on most of these voted features I haven't seen to much developer activity. Besides probably 5% of the arma2 community is registered on that website

[NeMeSiS 11]

Why should there be voted on cit to see real impact. Like bis cares how much people voted. The most wanted list hasn't changed for years. And on most of these voted features I haven't seen to much developer activity. Besides probably 5% of the arma2 community is registered on that website

It will help, but not all things are feasible and will just not happen unless the whole community chips in and throws money at BI.

[Gremlin 0]

Why should there be voted on cit to see real impact. Like bis cares how much people voted. The most wanted list hasn't changed for years. And on most of these voted features I haven't seen to much developer activity. Besides probably 5% of the arma2 community is registered on that website

I have watched over the years and BIS has responded to community desires. The game series has evolved so much since its inception. Their (BIS) priorities are not necessarily your personal priorities and vice-versus. CIT was a much-needed tool to consolidate the suggestions and get them to BIS. I doubt even five-percent of the community is registered with CIT because most are too busy gaming rather than looking for faults. For me, I still have fun with the game even if life is imperfect.

[LeadCommando65 10]

This:

- Remove object avoidance of driver while player is commander of vehicle and gives direct orders ("Forward","Left","Fast", ...)

- AIs should copy the crouch stance of the player, too (like it is already applied for prone stance)

- View LODs of some bushes are not accurate (-> causes the AI appear to have Xray vision) http://dev-heaven.net/issues/18845

- Camouflage doesn't work properly in forest (surfaceType = CRForest1) http://dev-heaven.net/issues/12144

- AI vehicles have 360 degree sight after target acquisition http://dev-heaven.net/issues/18846

Edited April 18, 2011 by LeadCommando65

[viper[cww] 14]

Regarding ragdoll who needs it when you have this to keep you happy :)

<-- just click the time at which I commented ;) Edited April 19, 2011 by VIPER[CWW]

[viper[cww] 14]

I would like the ability to be transported by Apache, sitting on the outside flanks.... see the video at @2:23 to understand what I mean....

[coopr 10]

;1900959']I would like the ability to be transported by Apache' date=' sitting on the outside flanks.... see the video at @2:23 to understand what I mean....

[url']

[/url]

I think your on the wrong forum m8. Try the just cause 2 forums maybe you'll have more luck there.

[wolfbite 8]

I demand Han Solo and The Wookie in the next patch.....

[viper[cww] 14]

I think your on the wrong forum m8. Try the just cause 2 forums maybe you'll have more luck there.

What a tool you are....

Its a suggestion and something that can come in very handy if other transport helo's are unavailable.... nice contribution you made by the way... now troll off!!

fyi in the I44 mod you can sit on a tank for transport, so this isnt so ludicrous as it happens in RL ;)

Edited April 20, 2011 by VIPER[CWW]

[coopr 10]

;1902132']What a tool you are....

Its a suggestion and something that can come in very handy if other transport helo's are unavailable.... nice contribution you made by the way... now troll off!!

fyi in the I44 mod you can sit on a tank for transport' date=' so this isnt so ludicrous as it happens in RL ;)[/quote']

It could become very handy? You were talking about sitting on the flanks of a aphace. I don't know if you ever drove 280 km in the open? But else I should pick you up on my bike and see how long you can sit up straight without blowing of or break your neck when you try to put your head outside of the windshield. And we are just talking about a bike imagine a apace. The only games where its possible is just cause 2 and battlefield heroes so what is wrong pointing you in that direction.

But lifting on tanks yes I would agree could be handy. And you saw that a lot in world war 2 havent seen many images from modern warfare where squads are getting transported on top of tanks. Don't think it would be a good idea in real life with the constant threat of ieds

[purepassion 22]

@VIPER[CWW]

check out NodUnits apache! Is that what you want?

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee200/NodUnit/Arma2%20and%20Operation%20Arrowhead/backseat.jpg?t=1303203864

XD

[tsb247 0]

I would LOVE to see them finally fix the grenades. Has nobody else noticed that BLUFOR are always using RGO grenades?

At first, I thought it was limited to Warfare scenarios, but it turns out that it is the same way in SP as well. U.S. Marines come equipped with Russian grenades!

http://dev-heaven.net/issues/19100 (for Single Player campaign)

http://dev-heaven.net/issues/17655#change-93253 (First spotted in Warfare)

[viper[cww] 14]

@VIPER[CWW]

check out NodUnits apache! Is that what you want?

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee200/NodUnit/Arma2%20and%20Operation%20Arrowhead/backseat.jpg?t=1303203864

XD

lmao mate, thats incredible, and look coopr.... he's holding on :p

I'm sure it is possible to be transported by an apache, perhaps the awesome vid finder PP can find some ;)

And they wouldn't be going the full speed the apache can fly at... dont be silly, it has and is being done now, also for case like casevac etc

@PurePassion a bit higher up and an arm holding on to one of those ladder bars would be perfect :) never seen that bug though lol

The apache isnt always used for combat effectiveness often they are called in when other helo's cant get to someone...

[wolfbite 8]

The moment that hellfire is fired that guy is going on a journey. I dont really think The sitting on the apache should be added ( I know it was used by britisj commando's in A-Stan but I think that is the only time anyone has ever done it... And that was due to extreme lack of options)... Otherwise you might aswell add people holding on to the skids of the hueys... Best left out so it doesnt get abused for ridiculous attacks...

[viper[cww] 14]

The moment that hellfire is fired that guy is going on a journey. I dont really think The sitting on the apache should be added ( I know it was used by britisj commando's in A-Stan but I think that is the only time anyone has ever done it... And that was due to extreme lack of options)... Otherwise you might aswell add people holding on to the skids of the hueys... Best left out so it doesnt get abused for ridiculous attacks...

a sensible answer, ah my thirst is quenched :)

[purepassion 22]

;1902567']lmao mate' date=' thats incredible, and look coopr.... he's holding on :p

I'm sure it is possible to be transported by an apache, perhaps the awesome vid finder PP can find some ;)

And they wouldn't be going the full speed the apache can fly at... dont be silly, it has and is being done now, also for case like casevac etc

@PurePassion a bit higher up and an arm holding on to one of those ladder bars would be perfect :) never seen that bug though lol

The apache isnt always used for combat effectiveness often they are called in when other helo's cant get to someone...[/quote']

XD

dude thats not an feature neither a bug.. it was meant to be an joke by Franze who is doing all the coding for this bird

and you better forget about this idea because it is very unrealistic and propably will never make its way into an patch.. ;)

i think the best solution for you would be toying with the attachTo command

---------- Post added at 09:12 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:04 AM ----------

I think if BIS wants to see a big bunch of happy gamers, they should finally implement RTT from VBS to arma2 OA

this would be an VERY useful feature that could solve many ingame problems

and give Arma 2 an whole new level of immersion

working MFD's...

you could finally drive backwards with an HMMWV ....

3D scopes.....

there are so many possibilites out there

[dmarkwick 261]

I'm not sure of the Hellfire mount loading tolerances but I'm pretty sure no-one will ever use one as a seat :)

[SyNcRoNiCzZ 0]

This !!!

http://dev-heaven.net/issues/16133

It looks ugly.

[arma2freak 10]

1) - New Backpacks!!

2) - Different cammo for the Takistani army

3) - General improvements on performance

4) - Some new textures for aircraft

5) - No AI improvements!!!

[viper[cww] 14]

XD

dude thats not an feature neither a bug.. it was meant to be an joke by Franze who is doing all the coding for this bird

and you better forget about this idea because it is very unrealistic and propably will never make its way into an patch.. ;)

i think the best solution for you would be toying with the attachTo command

---------- Post added at 09:12 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:04 AM ----------

I think if BIS wants to see a big bunch of happy gamers, they should finally implement RTT from VBS to arma2 OA

this would be an VERY useful feature that could solve many ingame problems

and give Arma 2 an whole new level of immersion

working MFD's...

you could finally drive backwards with an HMMWV ....

3D scopes.....

there are so many possibilites out there

:p

I have to be honest it isn't actually something I wanted to see, I just seen the video and thought hey that might come in handy, I know it will never be implemented etc haha

Now a serious suggestion although it may have been mentioned before, the ability to hang our weapons out of vehicles, so we can engage targets from the vehicle itself, its silly having to drive past jump out and then go after them... well I think we'd all be happy if every feature of VBS2 was added to ArmA II, but you have to think if that then happened, what's stopping the world military's from getting the much cheaper ArmA II ;)

[buliwyf 4]

I would like to see the possibility to detect corpses easily like: _obj = nearestObject [player, "deadBody"]

:rolleyes:

[coopr 10]

;1903185']:p

I have to be honest it isn't actually something I wanted to see' date=' I just seen the video and thought hey that might come in handy, I know it will never be implemented etc haha

Now a serious suggestion although it may have been mentioned before, the ability to hang our weapons out of vehicles, so we can engage targets from the vehicle itself, its silly having to drive past jump out and then go after them... well I think we'd all be happy if every feature of VBS2 was added to ArmA II, but you have to think if that then happened, what's stopping the world military's from getting the much cheaper ArmA II ;)[/quote']

No matter what features we get more as vbs2 I don't think they would switch to a commercial video game. They have training equipment hooked up to vbs2 to train loadmasters virtualy, they have weapons like javelins and real radio equipment don't see that happen in arma2 we should be happy if we were able to do custom key mapping and get 6 dof with your track Ir that is probably as far as it get with arma2

[carlostex 38]

setSide command