Longinius 1 Posted April 7, 2002 ""Surely it is time that our national broadcasters, not just, but including the BBC, stopped describing Hamas and Jihad with such euphemisms as radical and militant. Let us call things what they are: they are terrorist organizations... Such fudging of what Hamas or Islamic Jihad are confers some sort of legitimacy on people who are terrorists."" Well, that says more about mr Smiths standpoint than BBC's. And since when is mr Smith the man who defines terrorism and newsreporting anyway? For general information there is a Swedish women trapped in Betlehem who keeps contact with International Press. We will probably not get news from here for very much longer though. Much of her reports are recieved through cell phone communication and according to here IDF soldiers confiscate / destroy cellphones as they find them. She also tells of people bleeding to death in the streets because ambulances are denied entry. Those that try to get in are fired upon. We all know that the Israelies believe / know some ambulances carry weapons and explosives. But I wonder, why can't the Israelis go in and bring out the wounded? Isnt it there responsibility aswell to help wounded Palestinian civilians? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Longinius @ April 07 2002,15:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Well, that says more about mr Smiths standpoint than BBC's.<span id='postcolor'> Which says everything about your standpoint. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">And since when is mr Smith the man who defines terrorism and newsreporting anyway?<span id='postcolor'> Yes. What a silly amateur he must be, unlike a professional like you. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">For general information there is a Swedish women trapped in Betlehem who keeps contact with International Press. We will probably not get news from here for very much longer though. Much of her reports are recieved through cell phone communication and according to here IDF soldiers confiscate / destroy cellphones as they find them.<span id='postcolor'> Duh! </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">She also tells of people bleeding to death in the streets because ambulances are denied entry. Those that try to get in are fired upon.<span id='postcolor'> Ah yes! The ambulances again! http://www.honestreporting.com/Critiques/2002/27_ambulance.asp </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">We all know that the Israelies believe / know some ambulances carry weapons and explosives.<span id='postcolor'> More accurately, we know, you don't believe. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">But I wonder, why can't the Israelis go in and bring out the wounded? Isnt it there responsibility aswell to help wounded Palestinian civilians?<span id='postcolor'> More things the press doesn't tell you: "Accusing the IDF of Violating Ambulances & Hospitals: Case #6: The Palestinians: The Palestinian Authority accused the IDF of carrying out a massacre in the Ramallah hospital. The facts: This is an absolute falsehood. On 31 March 2002, following the receipt of reliable intelligence concerning the whereabouts of a large number of wanted suspects hiding in Ramallah hospitals, IDF forces entered the city's hospitals. This was done in order to carry out searches and verify the identities of those people in the hospitals. The IDF soldiers carried out their missions in a manner respectful to those in the medical facilities and withdrew. The IDF Spokesperson has strenuously denied false Palestinian claims concerning a massacre or mass murder in the Palestinian hospitals. This is another example of the baseless incitement fomented by the Palestinian Authority against the State of Israel and the IDF." Source: http://www.idf.il/english/news/lies.stm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted April 7, 2002 Well, of course. A Tory party leader has no aganda of his own... You have to admit that the British are less interested in the conflict then that the Jews and Palestinians are. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">My immediate surroundings? I live in Jerusalem. The neighborhood I'm in has not had any events but it's a small town, relatively speaking and it's just a 15 minute ride to the destroyed Moment Cafe or to the patched-up-multiple-times center of town. Since the start of the "Oslo War" in Sep. 2000, we as a family have ceased to eat out, go to major public places, such as town or a mall and are overly concerned with our 3 older children having to get to school every morning by public transportation. Recently, we've also stopped participating in hikes and 4x4 trips as an extra precaution. <span id='postcolor'> I can fully understand your views on the situation. I would probably saying the same things as you, if I was in your situation. You also know more history and fact then we do. The lives of your family might be in danger every day - so I fully understand why your views are as they are. But... This might sound awful... but your situation clouds your view of a 'higher good''. We, who havn't had the experience that you have and are not so involved can distance us from the fact of how it feels to be there, how it is to fear suicide bombings or Israeli tanks. Therefor we can make more objective judgement calls. Since we basically don't care too much we take a general humanitarian approach. We have nothing to fear and nothing to avenge. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 More on the Church of Nativity standoff from today's Jerusalem Post: http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2002/04/07/News/News.46443.html Specifically: "Col. Marcel Aviv, in charge of negotiations, said the priests told army officers the terrorists had forced their way into the church and are holding people hostage. Offers by the IDF to treat the wounded inside the church and offer humanitarian assistance have been rejected by the gunmen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 07 2002,16:01)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">But... This might sound awful... but your situation clouds your view of a 'higher good''.<span id='postcolor'> My, what nerve you have to make such accusations. How condescending! You don't know me and, from your posts, you and most everyone else here don't know what's going on at all. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> We, who havn't had the experience that you have and are not so involved can distance us from the fact of how it feels to be there, how it is to fear suicide bombings or Israeli tanks.<span id='postcolor'> You can also distance yourself from the details of events every day here for the past 2, 8 or 20 years. By your own admittance, out of shear ignorance, you have no right to judge. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Therefor we can make more objective judgement calls. Since we basically don't care too much we take a general humanitarian approach. We have nothing to fear and nothing to avenge.<span id='postcolor'> It is thanks to such European and US attitudes that there is indeed no peace in the middle east today. Let's be fair. Let's be even-handed. Let's not call a spade a spade. Let's not call Hamas and Jihad terrorists. Now you know why the vast majority of Israelis never did and never will take the EU seriously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Longinius 1 Posted April 7, 2002 ""Col. Marcel Aviv, in charge of negotiations, said the priests told army officers the terrorists had forced their way into the church and are holding people hostage. Offers by the IDF to treat the wounded inside the church and offer humanitarian assistance have been rejected by the gunmen." Then why do the priests inside and the Vatikan say that there are no hostages? How odd. But again, Jews know better than the rest of the world, I am sure. "Duh!" Meaning? As for the ambulances. I do believe some of them could have carried arms, explosives and terrorists. I wouldnt be suprised if that is the case. But I doubt ALL of them do it. And please, answer my question. Why does not the IDF make sure Palestinian civilians get medical aid when they need it? Why do they in fact make sure they DONT get medical attention? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted April 7, 2002 9--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ April 07 2002,159)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 07 2002,16<!--emo&)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">But... This might sound awful... but your situation clouds your view of a 'higher good''.<span id='postcolor'> My, what nerve you have to make such accusations. How condescending! You don't know me and, from your posts, you and most everyone else here don't know what's going on at all.<span id='postcolor'> Auch.. did I hit a nerve there? It's just common sense. If you say, get pushed by sombody while waiting in line, you might call the person that pushed you 'idiot', although he in reallity is a very nice man. When you are involved in a situation, you are involved. And obvious from your posts your involvement and bias overshadows the knowledge. As for the condenscending.. I was trying to be nice and understanding, but I am starting to loose my temper now. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> By your own admittance, out of shear ignorance, you have no right to judge. <span id='postcolor'> No, I said that we could judge, just because of shear lack of interest. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">It is thanks to such European and US attitudes that there is indeed no peace in the middle east today. <span id='postcolor'> No, it's thanks to extremists like you who talk of 'population transfers' and similar things. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Now you know why the vast majority of Israelis never did and never will take the EU seriously.<span id='postcolor'> Your loss. You need us much more then we need you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Longinius @ April 07 2002,16:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Then why do the priests inside and the Vatikan say that there are no hostages? How odd. But again, Jews know better than the rest of the world, I am sure.<span id='postcolor'> Then why don't they walk out? Several have escaped and have been interview by a foreign Italian TV station. That was last week. More news not getting through? Speaking of falsehoods: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=21233 More on the Church, again, at the IDF site: http://www.idf.il/english/news/lies.stm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 07 2002,16:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">No, it's thanks to extremists like you who talk of 'population transfers' and similar things.<span id='postcolor'> Extreme circumstances sometimes call for extreme solutions. The idea was proposed by arabs in 1939 to begin with. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Your loss. You need us much more then we need you.<span id='postcolor'> No thanks. Europe has been the source for our major losses throughout history. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 07 2002,16:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">No, I said that we could judge, just because of shear lack of interest.<span id='postcolor'> Please find some other guinnea pig to toy with your ideas. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ran 0 Posted April 7, 2002 ok , there's enough of a big conflict to don't start smaller ones some persons should calm down a little bit this thread could continue on more than 50 pages , but i think it will be closed before edit : fucking typos Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ April 07 2002,15:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Extreme circumstances sometimes call for extreme solutions.<span id='postcolor'> I think that some of your Palestinian suicide bombers agree with you on that. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The idea was proposed by arabs in 1939 to begin with. <span id='postcolor'> So you have said already, and I have said what I think of ethinc cleansing, no matter who suggests it. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Your loss. You need us much more then we need you.<span id='postcolor'> No thanks. Europe has been the source for our major losses throughout history.<span id='postcolor'> That's what the Palestinians will be saying about Israel if you get your will through. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Longinius @ April 07 2002,16:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">As for the ambulances. I do believe some of them could have carried arms, explosives and terrorists. I wouldnt be suprised if that is the case. But I doubt ALL of them do it.<span id='postcolor'> Well, is it 10% or 80%? Do you know? Can you guess? I can't either. But the IDF has come across these cases so many times that they've reached the decision not to allow the PRC vehicles through their lines. BTW, previously they were letting them through but only after they were checked. Sorry, the IDF had to choose between delaying an ambulance because of the constant Geneva Convention violations done by the PA with PRC vehicles versus the potential of terrorists coming through and blowing up in a crowded area or going on a shooting rampage at a busy intersection. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">And please, answer my question. Why does not the IDF make sure Palestinian civilians get medical aid when they need it? Why do they in fact make sure they DONT get medical attention?<span id='postcolor'> Read my links again. The IDF has tried negotiating to have Israeli Magen David Adom ambulances come in to battle areas (I wouldn't want to be one of the crew, I'll tell you that! and the PA has addamantly refused. BTW, there's nothing holding up the transfer of medical supplies to hospitals in the PA, to th best of my knowledge. It's a miserable situation but we don't have to take the risks of their ongoing flaunting of the ICRC's own rules. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ran @ April 07 2002,15:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">ok , there's enough of a big conflict to don't start smaller ones some persons should calm down a little bit this thread could continue in 50 more page , but i think it will be closed before<span id='postcolor'> You are probably right. I was interested in this thread because I thought I might learn something about the conflict, since there are several members here that are from Israel and know more then I do. So I attemped to keep a low profile and be nice and friendly. But.. when somebody bites without provocation, I bite back. I also have very little understanding for people who suggest that ethnic cleansing is a fine way to handle problems. I have seen the effects of that in another place and I really didn't like what I saw. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 07 2002,16:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ April 07 2002,15:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Extreme circumstances sometimes call for extreme solutions.<span id='postcolor'> I think that some of your Palestinian suicide bombers agree with you on that.<span id='postcolor'> Well, why didn't you say so just after the Oslo Accords were signed and Yitchak Rabin was a world hero and suicide bombers kept blowing themselves up in busses all over Israel back in 1994-95, when there were no Israeli incursions into the areas that were handed over to the PA in full compliance by Israel with the Oslo agreement? Thank you for your useful equation. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So you have said already, and I have said what I think of ethinc cleansing, no matter who suggests it.<span id='postcolor'> Good, so we'll leave all the Jews in Judea and Samaria. Now tell us how we'll make peace and have security? </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Your loss. You need us much more then we need you.<span id='postcolor'> No thanks. Europe has been the source for our major losses throughout history.<span id='postcolor'> That's what the Palestinians will be saying about Israel if you get your will through.<span id='postcolor'> Enough Palestinians have said for a long time that they themselves are their worst enemy. That leave Europe the #2 spot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Longinius @ April 07 2002,16:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">"Duh!" Meaning?<span id='postcolor'> Referring to what you said: "Much of her reports are recieved through cell phone communication and according to here IDF soldiers confiscate / destroy cellphones as they find them." It's no big surprise that the IDF wants to cut off communications of the terrorists inside the church as much as possible. BTW, we gave Arafat a recharged cell-phone battery. Ain't that sweet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ACEJim 0 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">No thanks. Europe has been the source for our major losses throughout history.<span id='postcolor'> Oh yeah. I forgot I was a racist anti-semite for a second there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ACEJim @ April 07 2002,16:55)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Oh yeah. I forgot I was a racist anti-semite for a second there.<span id='postcolor'> No, just a contributor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ April 07 2002,15:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 07 2002,16:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ April 07 2002,15:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Extreme circumstances sometimes call for extreme solutions.<span id='postcolor'> I think that some of your Palestinian suicide bombers agree with you on that.<span id='postcolor'> Well, why didn't you say so just after the Oslo Accords were signed and Yitchak Rabin was a world hero and suicide bombers kept blowing themselves up in busses all over Israel back in 1994-95, when there were no Israeli incursions into the areas that were handed over to the PA in full compliance by Israel with the Oslo agreement? Thank you for your useful equation.<span id='postcolor'> ? - not sure what you mean. I was just saying that your statement that extreme circumstances call for extreme solutions, is shared by some of your Palestinian enemies. That also seems to me like the kernel of the problem. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So you have said already, and I have said what I think of ethinc cleansing, no matter who suggests it.<span id='postcolor'> Good, so we'll leave all the Jews in Judea and Samaria. <span id='postcolor'> Yes! And I have said that already in an earlier post a couple of pages back. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Now tell us how we'll make peace and have security? <span id='postcolor'> I don't even pretend to know. I havn't commented at all on the current IDF operation. I don't know if it is justified or not. If you look at my posts you'll see that I have only gotten involved in questions about media/personal bias and 'population transfer'. I feel that I have enough common sense and personal experience to talk about them both. Edit: I now see that I have commented on some other things as well (international relations), but nothing specific relating to the current situation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ACEJim 0 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ April 07 2002,14:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">No, just a contributor.<span id='postcolor'> Sorry, I'm a bit confused, what am I contributing to? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 07 2002,16:58)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ April 07 2002,15:45)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ April 07 2002,16:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ April 07 2002,15:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Extreme circumstances sometimes call for extreme solutions.<span id='postcolor'> I think that some of your Palestinian suicide bombers agree with you on that.<span id='postcolor'> Well, why didn't you say so just after the Oslo Accords were signed and Yitchak Rabin was a world hero and suicide bombers kept blowing themselves up in busses all over Israel back in 1994-95, when there were no Israeli incursions into the areas that were handed over to the PA in full compliance by Israel with the Oslo agreement? Thank you for your useful equation.<span id='postcolor'> ? - not sure what you mean. I was just saying that your statement that extreme circumstances call for extreme solutions, is shared by some of your Palestinian enemies. That also seems to me like the kernel of the problem.<span id='postcolor'> I'm saying you're putting the cart before the horse. Let's pretend it's 1994 and 1995. Rabin and Arafat have signed the Oslo accords. Israel has retreated from all Areas A and B (except for agreed "joint patrols"). The number of terrorist events during Rabin's and then Peres' terms shoots through the roof. The number of Israelis killed and crippled from suicide bombers and gunners was never anywhere so high. Now apply your words: "I think that some of your Palestinian suicide bombers agree with you on that." Who was extreme here? Which other country do you know that would tolerate such a situation for 8 damned years? It is the cause of the problem - not the kernal - and the solutions remaining are extreme. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ACEJim @ April 07 2002,17:05)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ April 07 2002,14:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">No, just a contributor.<span id='postcolor'> Sorry, I'm a bit confused, what am I contributing to?<span id='postcolor'> Confusion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nordin dk 0 Posted April 7, 2002 What reasons do you think they had for the suicide bombs at that time then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted April 7, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (nordin dk @ April 07 2002,17:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">What reasons do you think they had for the suicide bombs at that time then?<span id='postcolor'> In a statement quoted worldwide, in a Johannesburg mosque on May 10 1994, less than a week after signing the Gaza and Jericho accords in Cairo with Israel, Arafat stated his true intentions: "The jihad will continue, and Jerusalem is not for the Palestinian people, it is for all the Muslim people ... You have to come to fight and to start the jihad to liberate Jerusalem." Yitzak Rabin publicly dismissed these words without explanation at the time. More quotes from various PA sources over the first years after Oslo. Please read them through and you maybe maybe maybe just get the idea of what we Israelis have been going through (or ignoring) for the past eight years. * “The settlements must be erasedâ€: A broadcast on the Palestinian Authority’s official “Voice of Palestine†radio station, May 31, 1999, declared: “The settlements must be erased from the face of the earth.†* “Employ all meansâ€: Longtime Arafat aide Hanan Ashrawi urged the Palestinian Arab masses to “employ all means of protest†against Israel. (Arutz 7, June 1, 1999) * “Ignite the land under their feetâ€: A leaflet distributed by Arafat’s Fatah faction of the PLO on May 31, 1999, threatened: “We will ignite the land under their feet until they leave our land forever.†(Associated Press, June 2, 1999) * “Intensify the confrontationsâ€: Samir Shehada, the PA official in charge of organizing anti-Israel demonstrations, vowed on May 31, 1999: “We will intensify the confrontations against the settlements and the settlers.†(Arutz 7, June 1, 1999) * “Ready to fight a new battleâ€: In a speech in Ramallah on March 19, 1999, Arafat threatened: “We carried out the longest intifada in history...They should know we can start it again if they try to prevent us from exercising our rights,†and “We, the Fatah and PLO, are ready to fight a new battle of Karameh every single day,†referring to a battle between Israel and PLO terrorists in 1968. (Agence France Presse, March 19, 1999) * “The rifle is a means of life†: Othman Abu Gharbiya, adviser to Arafat and head of the PA’s National Guidance Directorate, at a ceremony in Gaza: “We are right to believe that the rifle is a means of life and not death.†(Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah, March 1, 1999) * “Explode with forceâ€: From the biweekly communique of Arafat’s Fatah faction, published in the PA newspaper Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah, Dec. 21, 1998: “It is impossible to struggle against the settlements, the confiscation of land and cold-blooded killings via negotiations. There is no alternative but a struggle that will smash the Israeli aggression and emphasize the readiness of our people to explode with force against any aggression...†* “Our rifles are readyâ€: Arafat, to his Fatah faction, on November 15, 1998: “Our rifles are ready, and we are ready to raise them if they stop us from praying in the holy city of Jerusalem.†(Jerusalem Post, Nov. 16, 1998) * “The path of jihadâ€: Speaking at the funeral of an Arab terrorist in Gaza on June 4, 1998, Ahmad Hils, secretary-general of Yasir Arafat’s Fatah movement in Judea-Samaria, said: “The path of jihad, struggle, and heroism continues to be the only way to liberate Palestine and to establish our independent state with Jerusalem as its capital, and so it will be in the future.†(Quoted in the Palestinian Authority-affiliated newspaper Al Ayyam, June 25, 1998.) * “To fight, to resistâ€: In an interview with the Israeli news agency IMRA on May 17, 1998, Marwan Barghouti, chairman of Arafat’s Fatah movement in Judea-Samaria, was asked about recent Palestinian Arab demonstrations in which models of Israeli towns in the territories were exploded: IMRA: “Blowing up models of settlements is in order to encourage people to resist the settlements?†Barghouti: “Yes. And I think that we have the legitimacy to resist the settlement policy.†IMRA: “To blow up settlements?†Barghouti: “To fight, to resist the settlements.†IMRA: “So that would include blowing them up.†Barghouti: “Everything. Because the settlement policy is terrorism. We have the right to fight against the terrorism.†* “Become a martyrâ€: On Egyptian Orbit TV on April 18, 1998, Arafat declared: “I envy the martyrs and I hope to become one of them.†* “Burn the ground under their feetâ€: In a statement published in the official Palestinian Authority newspaper Al-Hayat Al-Jadida on April 16, 1998, Arafat sent this message to his people: “O my dear ones on the occupied lands, relatives and friends throughout Palestine and the diaspora, my colleagues in struggle and in arms, my colleagues in struggle and in jihad ... Intensify the revolution and the blessed intifada ... We must burn the ground under the feet of the invaders.†* “Swear by the blood of the jihadâ€: Also on April 16, 1998, Arafat’s official Voice of Palestine radio station broadcast a speech by Marwan Barghouti, chairman of Arafat’s Fatah movement in Judea-Samaria, in which he said: “The rifle of Fatah, the rifle carried by the Palestinian people which ignited the revolution, will not be buried...Brothers and sisters, I swear, I swear, I swear by the blood of the jihad and the blood of our nation’s martyrs.†* “Suicide bombings are legitimateâ€: The PA-appointed Mufti of Jerusalem, Sheikh Ikrama Sabri, said in March 1998: “I believe suicide bombings are a response to the occupation...If Israel does not respond to peaceful initiatives to solve the problem with the Palestinians, then it is legitimate to fight against it as a sort of self-defense.†(Reuters, March 19, 1998) * “March as warriors of jihadâ€: From a song sung by children on the program “The Children’s Club,†broadcast on PA Television on February 13, 1998: “Each and every part of your soil I have drenched with all my blood. And we shall march as warriors of jihad. O my exalted martyr, you are my example.†* “Convoys of martyrsâ€: On the 80th anniversary of Balfour Day —the 1917 British declaration endorsing the establishment of a Jewish national home in the Land of Israel— Mazen Izz Al-Din, chief of the PA’s National Guidance Directorate said on PA Television: “Our people is capable of erasing the political implications of the Balfour Declaration through convoys of martyrs.†(Arutz 7 radio, Nov. 6, 1997) * “There will be severe clashesâ€: “If a solution is not found to the situation and the political process is not returned to its course, there will be severe clashes between us and the Israelis . All options are open before us.†—Jibril Rajoub , head of the Palestinian Preventive Security Forces, in a television interview (Middle East Broadcasting Corp., June 20, 1997) * “Ready for sacrificesâ€: Abbas Zaki, member of the PA legislative council and the Fatah central committee: “There is a plan which was prepared by the Palestinian leadership with the aim of confronting Israel’s intransigence. The Palestinian people is ready for a confrontation and is prepared to make additional sacrifices. The people are in a state of preparedness.†(Al-Sharq al-Awsat, June 16, 1997) * “React via all meansâ€: “The policy of settlements and land confiscation constitutes organized state terror against the Palestinian lands. The Palestinian people have the right to react to settlement terror via all means.†—from a statement issued by Fatah after an emergency meeting on June 14, 1997, broadcast on PA Radio on June 14, 1997. (Israel Government Press Office) * “Revolutionary violenceâ€: From a lead editorial in the Fatah organization’s newspaper (cited in Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah, June 4, 1997): “Only the uprising of the masses and the intifada in the Palestinian homeland in September 1996 enabled the Palestinians to hope for international and Arab support. It is this intifada which compelled the Israeli side to implement the Oslo Accords. What distinguished this intifada was its official nature. Palestinian security forces took part side by side with the masses. Only once the flow of blood began and Israelis died at the hands of the security forces’ gunfire did Netanyahu understand that his assumption that the Palestinians and Arabs did not have other options was baseless. Only then did he understand that he must get used to new realities. Revolutionary violence, which enjoys international legitimacy as a struggle against occupation, is the option that must be put on the discussion table. This is the option that will bring about a breakthrough in the current impasse and breathe new life into the agreements.†* “All options are openâ€: “All options are open for defending the land of the Palestinian people.†—PA Planning Minister Nabil Shaath, at a forum in Khan Yunis. (Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah, April 30, 1997) * “With blood and fireâ€: “I now see the walls of Jerusalem, the mosques of Jerusalem, the churches of Jerusalem. My brothers! With blood and with spirit we will redeem you, Palestine! Yes, with blood and with spirit we will redeem you, Palestine!†—Arafat, addressing a crowd in Tulkarm, broadcast on PA Radio on April 28, 1997. (Israel Government Press Office) * “I will killâ€: From a poem read on the PLO’s Voice of Palestine on May 22, 1997 during the morning news program “A New Day.†It was read as part of a series of “Songs of the Homeland.†The same poem was read on the Voice of Palestine during the Sept. 1996 riots. “O our beautiful, precious land imprisoned in a cage and surrounded by wolves, My shaded garden, the cruel tormentors have destroyed you, and the dogs have settled in you, O Jerusalem, O my city, With my notebook and pencil and the fire of my rifle I will shatter the cage, I will kill the wolves and plant the flag, The dogs will not bark in the heroic cities.†(Israel Government Press Office) * “Ready to sacrifice againâ€: “We did not pay with the dear blood of thousands of martyrs so that the Israeli government could establish settlements on our land in the name of peace. We have sacrificed in the past and we will be ready to sacrifice again in the future for the sake of liberating our land and returning it to the bosom of the Palestinian nation and for the sake of establishing an independent Palestinian state whose capital is Jerusalem.†—from a statement issued by the PA cabinet in Nablus on May 16, 1997 (PA Radio, May 17, 1997) * “We know only one word: jihadâ€: Speaking at a rally in Dehaishe, near Bethlehem, on October 21, 1996, Arafat said: “We know only one world, jihad, jihad, jihad. Whoever does not like it can drink from the Dead Sea or from the Sea of Gaza.†(Yediot Ahronot, Oct. 23, 1996) * “Prepare the stonesâ€: Arafat to a delegation of Hebron Arab notables urging the use of violence: “Have you run out of stones in Hebron? Prepare the stones.†(Israel Radio, Oct. 21, 1996) * “Ready in every wayâ€: Arafat in an October 10, 1996 speech before the Palestinian Council: “Negotiations have achieved nothing up until now. As a consequence, we must be ready in every way to confront all possibilities. You must understand what I mean by this.†(Near East Report, Oct. 21, 1996) * “Mass confrontationsâ€: Arafat, in an interview with the Palestinian newspaper Al-Ayyam, called for “mass confrontations in all cities and villages to confront the Israeli aggression against Al-Aksa mosque.†(cited in the New York Times, Oct. 4, 1996) * “Kill and be killedâ€: Arafat to Palestinian security forces in Gaza on September 24, 1996: “They will fight for Allah, and they will kill and be killed, and this is a solemn oath...Our blood is cheap compared with the cause which has brought us together and which at moments separated us, but shortly we will meet again in heaven... Palestine is our land and Jerusalem is our capital.†(Ma’ariv, Oct. 4, 1996) * “Return to armed struggleâ€: On August 30, 1996, Muhammad Dahlan, a senior Gaza PA security official, said: “The Palestinian Authority does not exclude the return to the armed struggle, and it will then use its weapons.†(Jerusalem Report, Nov. 28, 1996) * “Use all meansâ€: On August 6, Arafat called Israel a “demon†and urged Arabs to use “all means†at their disposal to fight Israel. (New York Times, Aug. 7, 1996) * “Rise up with all your mightâ€: PA Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Sheikh Ikram Sabri in a sermon at Al-Aqsa Mosque: Palestinians should “rise up with all their might against the occupation.†(Jerusalem Post, June 14, 1996) * “We have 30,000 menâ€: Arafat threatening Israel with violence: “If Israel rejects our demands there will be aâ€reaction and we have a 30,000 man armed force.†(Israel Radio, June 7, 1996) * “All acts of violence will returnâ€: PA Planning Minister Nabil Shaath at a symposium: “If the negotiations reach a dead end, we shall go back to the struggle and strife, as we did for 40 years. It is not beyond our capabilities ... If and when Israel will say, ‘That’s it, we won’t talk about Jerusalem, we won’t return refugees, we won’t dismantle settlements, and we won’t retreat from borders,’ then all the acts of violence will return. Except that this time we’ll have 30,000 armed Palestinian soldiers who will operate in areas in which we have unprecedented elements of freedom†(Jerusalem Post, March 15, 1996) * “From the small jihad to the great jihadâ€: Selim Zaanoun, acting chairman of the Palestinian National Council, at Arafat’s inauguration: “We are returning to Palestine, and we are passing from the small Jihad to the great Jihad.†(Jerusalem Post, Feb. 13, 1996) * “Sacrifice the last boy and girlâ€: “The Israelis are mistaken if they think we do not have an alternative to negotiations. By Allah, I swear they are wrong. The Palestinian people are prepared to sacrifice the last boy and the last girl so that the Palestinian flag will be flown over the walls, the churches and the mosques of Jerusalem.†—Arafat, speech on August 6, 1995 at a party celebrating the birth of his daughter, quoted in the Jerusalem Post, Sept. 7, 1995 * “Soul and bloodâ€: Arafat in a speech in Gaza: “The soul and the blood we shall sacrifice for thee Palestine.†(Jerusalem Post, Aug. 3, 1995) * “The weapon of jihadâ€: Speaking to Arab laborers in Gaza in January 1995, Arafat said: “All of us are willing to be martyrs along the way, until our flag flies over Jerusalem, the capital of Palestine. Let no one think they can scare us with weapons, for we have mightier weapons— the weapon of faith, the weapon of martyrdom, the weapon of jihad.†(Parade magazine, June 25, 1995) * “Jihad via deathsâ€: In a speech at Al Azhar University in Gaza on June 19, 1995, Arafat said: “The commitment still stands and the oath is still valid: that we will continue this long jihad, this difficult jihad...via deaths, via battles.†(Jerusalem Post, Aug. 3, 1995) * “Liberate Jerusalem by jihadâ€: The PA-appointed Mufti of Jerusalem, Sheikh Ikrama Sabri, said: “Jerusalem is under occupation and the Moslems of the world should liberate it by jihad and put it under Islamic and Arabic authority.†(Jerusalem Post, May 3, 1995) * “The military optionâ€: Faisal Husseini in an interview with the Egyptian weekly Al-Arabi: “If Israel continues to undermine the path to peace there will be no other alternative but that called for by the Islamist Palestinian opposition—the military option.†(Agence France Presse, May 1, 1995) * “No option other than jihadâ€: The Gaza Arab newspaper Al Watan, reported on February 28, 1995, that PA cabinet minister Nabil Sha’ath said: “In response to a question on steps the Palestinian Authority might take to confront Israeli measures, Sha’ath stressed that the Palestinian Authority is waging a struggle at the negotiating table. If it becomes certain that the negotiations process with Israel is ending in failure, there will be no option other than jihad.†* “A nation of jihad.†In a speech relayed by telephone to a rally in Hebron, and broadcast on the PA’s Voice of Palestine Radio on February 14, 1995, Arafat said: “Our nation is a nation of sacrifice, struggle, and jihad.†* “Until the last martyrâ€: Arafat in a speech on the 30th anniversary of Fatah’s founding: “We are going to continue the Palestinian revolution until the last martyr to create a Palestinian state†and “We are all seekers of martyrdom...I say to the martyrs who died, to the martyrs who are still alive, we hold to the oath, we hold to the commitment to continue the revolution...†(PA Television, Jan. 1, 1995) * “Our people’s jihad.†In a 1994 speech to the Organization of the Islamic Conference, Arafat said: “The glorious Islamic solidarity together with our people’s jihad is an additional inducement for the realization of our hopes.†(Israeli Government Report, November 27, 1996, quoting the PA Radio, December 15, 1994) * “Our people’s jihad.†Addressing the Organization of the Islamic Conference in 1994, Arafat said: “The glorious Islamic solidarity together with our people’s jihad is an additional inducement for the realization of our hopes.†(PA Radio, Dec. 15, 1994) * “Continue with jihadâ€: At a rally in Gaza, Arafat declared: “Our people will continue with its jihad.†(Ha’aretz, Nov. 22, 1994) * “Continue the warâ€: Arafat in a letter to Saddam Hussein: “The Palestinian people will continue their war until the establishment of a state whose capital will be Jerusalem.†(Yediot Ahronot, July 24, 1994) * “We sanctify the weaponsâ€: Jibril Rajoub in a lecture at Bethlehem University: “We sanctify the weapons found in the possession of the national factions which are directed against the occupation ... If there are those who oppose the agreement with Israel, the gates are open to them to intensify the armed struggle.†(Yediot Ahronot, May 27, 1994) * “The jihad will continueâ€: In a speech in a Johannesburg mosque on May 10, 1994, Arafat said: “The jihad will continue, and Jerusalem is not for the Palestinian people, it is for all the Muslim people ... You have to come to fight and to start the jihad to liberate Jerusalem.†(Ha’aretz, May 23, 1994) * “Return to the armed struggleâ€: Jibril Rajoub: “We shall distribute weapons to the Palestinian residents and return to the armed struggle.†(Yediot Ahronot, March 4, 1994) * “The intifada is continuingâ€: Arafat during a speech in Gaza: “The heroic intifada, which has entered its seventh year, is an extension of the 29-year old Palestinian revolution and will go on relentlessly ... It is continuing, continuing, continuing.†(Associated Press, Jan. 7, 1994) * “Revolution until victoryâ€: Arafat in a radio address: “It is a revolution until victory, until victory, until victory.†(Algiers, PA Radio, Dec. 31, 1993) * “We have not given up the rifleâ€: Faisal Husseini in a speech at Bir Zeit University on November 22, 1993: “Everything you see and hear today is for tactical and strategic reasons. We have not given up the rifle. We still have armed gangs in the areas and if we do not get our state we will take them out of the closet and fight again.†(Ma’ariv, Nov. 24, 1993) * “Continue the struggleâ€: Voice of Palestine report: “Yasser Arafat stressed the continuation of struggle until the Palestinian flag is hoisted over Jerusalem’s walls.†(PA Radio, Oct. 24, 1993) * “Only a stone’s throw awayâ€: Arafat in a speech on Jordanian TV: “Palestine is only a stone’s throw away for a small Palestinian boy or girl.†(Jordanian TV, Sept. 13, 1993) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aeon 0 Posted April 7, 2002 so you like media ? I don't trust CNN and the other, I read only : www.indymedia.org BTW, watch the IDF propaganda practice : http://www.indymedia.org.il/imc....d=16989 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites