Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
vilas

PROJECT'85 TOPIC

Recommended Posts

Its planned to bring the RF pack to V.3.00 but so far i lacked talented modellers to do so.

As Vilas showed intrest maybe it can be done, but i fear that i plan in too big scale as Vilas has pretty limited time lately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hate to go offtopic, but what happened to Skaven et al?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for digging up topic like this, but I just was wondering, will you model the m249 minimi for the US forces, I know it didnt see much of use in 80's. But it was used by US army till 90's when they changed it to the m249 SAW. so, Will you add it to US forces? smile_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They made four different models of SAW/Minimi to cover all angles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn, you beat me to it.

Krisitian,

Check the first page about half way down, vilas' post contains a ton of links for screens. biggrin_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

those M249 are already released as P85 mod uses my weapons pack

so every weapon can be found in my addons topic since some time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Will you made polish T80 and T72?

oooooooooooooooooooooo my god, Polish T80 huh.gif?huh.gif and you were "teaching" me how should look my Polish addon and Polish weapons and vests (for example with Beryl fire selectors and safe switch)

i am in shock :O

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Will you made polish T80 and T72?

Afaik no T80s were delivered to other WP nations but T-72, yes that will be in.

Steven Zaloga has mentioned in one of his books that Poland had accepted the shipment of about half-a-dozen T-80Bs for trials in the mid-eighties. That's about it for the extent of T-80 exports at that time. I agree, certainly no need to include them in the mod.

Peace,

DreDay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vilas, The m249 SAW without the picannity rail on top of the ammo-hatch. you have to move the rear siht to te same postion as MINIMI has it wink_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The request to make at all Soviet tanks having ATGM an ammunition, main means of a defeat of enemy armored vehicles with high accuracy remaining outside of a zone of reach, in sense, that ATGM the rocket was first and ready to application, then on termination (ending) the given type of an ammunition, following was charged APFSDS,and then HEAT-FRAG, HEAT.:)

So it is more reasonable, and is more real, taking into account that the Soviet tank wedges of that time had no to themselves equal all world, as much know the rate was done(made) on large approach by the large number of tanks, at support the soldier smile_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The request to make at all Soviet tanks having ATGM an ammunition, main means of a defeat of enemy armored vehicles with high accuracy remaining outside of a zone of reach, in sense, that ATGM the rocket was first and ready to application, then on termination (ending) the given type of an ammunition, following was charged APFSDS,and then HEAT-FRAG, HEAT.:)

So it is more reasonable, and is more real, taking into account that the Soviet tank wedges of that time had no to themselves equal all world, as much know the rate was done(made) on large approach by the large number of tanks, at support the soldier  smile_o.gif

Why? The tank guns do a fine job of engaging the targets withing 2-3km and you are not very likely to see the engagement ranges beyound that in ArmA...

Peace,

DreDay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hate to go offtopic, but what happened to Skaven et al?

Just read it.

Well im not sure myself, he seemd pretty busy after we had V.2.00 done and since then i havent heard of him again.

But i think he still browses the forums from time to time so maybe hell reads this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once more excellent work, cant wait to see it on the birds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@GodHammer

Uhm, very nice as usual, fellow. smile_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

somebody asked about Skaven, he is okay, he has private life smile_o.gif

i had last message from him some time ago when i was worrying what happened that there is no sound of life

but he is okay, he just had his some time on Arma for fun, now he is living his private life smile_o.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Very good work GH, as usual! wink_o.gif

You should do a special pack to let other MODs use your great weapons... like a weapons pack. smile_o.gif

By the way, any news about your SA-9 Gaskin? biggrin_o.gif

Good day!

-Soviet-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all thanks everybody for kind comments.

I'm trying to help out many Mods at the same time, lol, I think cooperation is the key wink_o.gif

My Sams are all on hold but not forgotten, need to finish some models requested, then I'll be back on those babies smile_o.gif

Soviet, may I ask you a favour?

Are you able to find good pics of the GUV-8700 gatling pod?

I'd like to add it to my collection, lol smile_o.gif

Thank you all again,

cheers GH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also like to see tank-fired ATGM's on the soviet tanks. It would help offset their comparatively poor sabot rounds...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Yes, cooperation is the ''key'' according me too. wink_o.gif

I hope you'll find the time to finish your great SAMs, they look really great! smile_o.gif

I'll try too find some pics of that GUV-8700 to help you... biggrin_o.gif

*EDIT*

fb50473ef5ac32609e529e2d2064be6c_full.jpg

Website (2 pics)

Website (1 pic)

Website (2 pics)

Very interesting loadout infos:

Website

On page 13 you'll find front, side and up view of the GUV-8700.

About the grenade launcher:

Website

... I think that's all I can do... smile_o.gif

Good day!

-Soviet-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to vote against ATGMs, for a couple of reasons.

1. You can't properly detect tanks at range. The only tool available is the Arma "Radar," with no thermal imaging or anything else, besides zooming in and scanning. Enemy tanks often get lost in the viewdistance fog. If you've ever run up on a BMP in an Abrams, you've probably been hit by the ATGM before you even know it was there, and then found out that the BMP was just outside your viewdistance. Now imagine platoons of tanks doing that.

2. They're not modeled well at all in Arma, but with NWD's addons, tank ballistics are (relatively well modeled, anyway). I'd rather have guns that work vs guns that work than guns vs a poor representation of ATGM's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The progress goes nicely, several aspects of the MOD are polished on regular basis, but we are actually focused on figuring out all the issues popping out and completing the models selection.

A cooperation with the RACS MOD was established in order to help both Projects and the skilled 3D Artist/Coder Vektorbosen lastly joined us and this will undoubtedly bring a lot to the Project'85 MOD.

Regards,

TB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×