miggie 0 Posted April 17, 2007 i was wondering what graph card you have and on what settings you play.. if you have fps you can also post cause im getting new 3d card and wondering about some of your results Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Op4 BuhBye 0 Posted April 17, 2007 I have a GeForce 7800GS OC AGP. Im running about 30-50 Fps. Quality Preferance: Very High Turrain Detail: Vrey Low Object Detail: Normal Texture Detail: Normal Shading Detail: Very Low PostProsses: Low Antisotropic Filtering: Very High Shadow Detail: Low Antialiasing: Very High Visibility: 4000 Blood: High Running a XP 3000+ 1.5 gig of RAM SB Audigy gamer For the most part the game runs great for me. I get some lag but it doesn't last long. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtec 0 Posted April 17, 2007 Im running a 7900gs but id recommend a 7950 as they are cheap and run armed assault very well with most settings on max. Just make sure you have a decent processor and also 2+ gig of ram (depending on your operating system) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
killerwhale 1 Posted April 17, 2007 X1950XT 512mb PCI-e 1 gb RAM Core 2 duo 2.4 XP Media Center my fps is in between 30-50 everything set high Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Richieb0y 0 Posted April 17, 2007 Quality Preferance: High Turrain Detail: Normal Object Detail: Normal Texture Detail: Normal Shading Detail: Normal PostProsses: Low Antisotropic Filtering: Normal Shadow Detail: Low Antialiasing: Low Visibility: 2500 Blood: High Res: 1024x768 32bit i get 25 fps too 45 in the desert in the city it dips 18-25 it hangs off how many bushis and trees there are but on the Souther Sharani Map i get better fps   Specs below Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4 IN 1 0 Posted April 17, 2007 E6600 non O/C 8800GTS non O/C 2 GB DDRII-800 ram Asus P5B Deluxe Turrain Detail: High Object Detail: High Texture Detail: High Shading Detail: High PostProsses: High Antisotropic Filtering: Very High Shadow Detail: High Antialiasing: High Visibility: 3600~4000 Blood: High not totally maxed out, 1024x768 32bit but tested on 32" TV with different res setting all works fairly well ~stable 40 at 1024x768, drop to 20 in HD(AA on, pp on) some time use nHancer with a bit lower AA and prerender limit 0 to fix texture loading bug, setting as such http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/1460/nhancesettingph1.jpg quick edit: i just run a stress test, seems perforemce would drop quite a bit when time pass, and texture bugs will be back, but not to unplayable level, no freeze Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLSmith2112 0 Posted April 17, 2007 ArmA Mark... Huge http://paladin.madtrax.cc/armamark/generator.php?doc=index〈=en Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
max power 21 Posted April 17, 2007 Terrain Detail: Low Object Detail: Low Texture Detail: Low Shading Detail: High Post Processing: High Antisotropic Filtration: Normal Shadow Detail: Low Antialiasing: Off Visibility: 4200 Blood: High resolution: 1360 x 768 Average fps ~35 AMD 4400+ O/C to 2.5 ghz A8R32 MVP Deluxe 2 gigs ocx DDR ram ATI x850 CE (256) O/C to 629 mhz / 615 mhz Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hedcrusha 0 Posted April 17, 2007 New rig i bought other day All maxed and 40+ fps xfx 8800 gtx xxx edition xfx 680i mobo corsair 6400 dominator 800 mhz 2gb 400gb sata II 700w psu Duo core 2 e6600 Runs absalutly fantastic compared to running it on a gf 6800 1 gb ram and 2.8+ amd! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OFPDude 0 Posted April 17, 2007 Nvidia 7600GT 256MB.....cheap but gets the job done. Intel P930D 3.0Ghz 1GB DDR400 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Terrain Detail: Low Object Detail: Normal Texture Detail: Normal Shading Detail: Low Post Processing: Low Antisotropic Filtration: High Shadow Detail: Disabled Antialiasing: Off (I use SSAA instead) Visibility: 2000 Low FPS: 20 Average FPS: 30 High FPS: 50 If I were you I would hold on until the 8600 and 8300 DX10's cards are released in a few weeks.....prices will on the fall. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hedcrusha 0 Posted April 17, 2007 I know its expensive but ide save up for ( like i did ) the beast 8800 gtx itll eat any game alive trust me!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dirtylarrygb 0 Posted April 17, 2007 i was wondering what graph card you have and on what settings you play.. if you have fps you can also post cause im getting new 3d card and wondering about some of your results IF your system is PCIE then both the top 7 series from Nvidia and 1950's from ATI are very good cards. Both these cards need a decent PSU, at least 500W or over. If your have PCI E and a good CPU already then a 8800 GTS/GTX delivers the most power but many need a new PSu to run them as a 600w-700W dual 12v rail PSU is required. An E4300 and a 8800 GTS is faster than even the most expensive machines from last year and not that expensive. I would always advise if into PC gaming to try and get an 8800 GTS over any other card, i.e. 8600, 8300 etc. As they only cost a little more and generally deliver enough power to run most games with all eye candy. Soon as you skimp on the cost of a GPU you limit your options in games on that PC. I would certainly now recommend the 8800 series now most of the driver bugs have gone. And as they are Dx10 ready, you would be ready for all the new DX10 games coming on Vista. For ARMA a 7600 and above is good. The more you spend on a GPU the more eye candy you can enable at higher resolutions. Right now i would only really recommend an 8800 or r600 as there Dx10 compatability will become important soon and the older Dx9 cards will crash in price. The big question is are you AGP or PCIE on your mobo, how good is your PSU and do you want Dx10 now or just buy a Dx9 card now then upgrade? I have cards by EVGA XFX and BFG, I recommend all three companies for service build quality and drivers. 8800 GTS 320 VRAM http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductInfo.asp?WebProductID=545050 Less than 200 pounds 8800 GTS 640 VRAM http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductInfo.asp?WebProductID=548374 260 pounds and lots of vram, pretty future proof this one. 8800 GTX 768 budget http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductInfo.asp?WebProductID=506623 360 pounds 8800 GTX 768 OC with great cooling system http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductInfo.asp?WebProductID=534219 440, bit overpriced but i recommend the EVGA cooler really helps keep a 8800 cool. EVGA also have a rebate system to trade in their cards for new ones. 700 W 12v dual rail 8800 PSU http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductInfo.asp?WebProductID=468732 40 pounds!!!! runs a single 8800 like a dream. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Infam0us 10 Posted April 17, 2007 7900GS PCI - Everything Very High 30FPS Ftw Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
overkill 0 Posted April 18, 2007 Intel Pentium 4 3.0 ghz ddr2 pc5300 ram 1 gig XFX 7900gt 256 meg graphics card I run all settings on "VERY HIGH" including AA. AF, PP and Blood are Normal, Low,Low. BTW I recently added another gig of ram ( for a total of 2 gigs)and the game run much better. It's smoother and I do not get those blocky graphics 20 minutes into the game anymore. I do not know my FPS though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CameronMcDonald 146 Posted April 18, 2007 ASUS EN8800GTX @ 675/1050 (2100) Very high for everything, 8X AA, 16S AF. Viewdistance 10,000. I love ASUS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheVoodoo 0 Posted April 18, 2007 ASUS EN8800GTX @ 675/1050 (2100)Very high for everything, 8X AA, 16S AF. Viewdistance 10,000. And? You're having fun playing ArmA with 16-25fps? Don't forget that the set Viewdistance doesn't affect the Multiplayer viewdistance. It's set by the mission or the server. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4 IN 1 0 Posted April 18, 2007 ASUS EN8800GTX @ 675/1050 (2100)Very high for everything, 8X AA, 16S AF. Viewdistance 10,000. And? You're having fun playing ArmA with 16-25fps? Don't forget that the set Viewdistance doesn't affect the Multiplayer viewdistance. It's set by the mission or the server. not all 8800 user experence low FPS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheVoodoo 0 Posted April 18, 2007 ähm, however... i cannot believe that some ppl with 8xFSAA, 10000m Viewdistance and all settings at Veryhigh are having a lot more then 20fps. maybe in the desert or above the ocean. i will believe if someone hosts a HD Video with all that settings mentioned. best ingame position for test: on the highest mountain in south sharani, looking around. If you go with AA enabled to a bush/tree the FPS will drop to 10 for sure! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CameronMcDonald 146 Posted April 18, 2007 OK then, just allow me to reinstall FRAPs. I'll be a little while. How much are you willing to download? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheVoodoo 0 Posted April 18, 2007 300-400MB compressed with a good codec should be sufficient Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mattxr 9 Posted April 18, 2007 GF 8800 GTX Turrain Detail: High Object Detail: High Texture Detail: High Shading Detail: High PostProsses: High Antisotropic Filtering: Very High Shadow Detail: High Antialiasing: High Visibility: 2500~5000 Blood: High 30 - 35 FPS 1440-900 Resolution Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kirby 2 Posted April 18, 2007 Some cheap ass intel card 512MB RAM ect. 2FPS. (Demo) Â Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VictorTroska 0 Posted April 18, 2007 Some cheap ass intel card512MB RAM ect. 2FPS. (Demo) Â Hehe..we have a winner Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CameronMcDonald 146 Posted April 18, 2007 Blazin - damn. Voodoo - alas, I must concede defeat, since running Frap's video recording function on full reso drops my FPS into ~15 zone, which is unacceptable (both for viewing and for brag rights). Although I cannot show you video evidence, I will give you some pics, if you will believe that I am not so much of a master Photoshopper that I faked them or dropped my settings. It's my word of honour that I did no such thing. OK, here we are. Session settings (note that 10km viewdistance prevents selecting terrain detail as high or very high). Paraiso from the highest mountain on south Sahrani. Continued next post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CameronMcDonald 146 Posted April 18, 2007 Imageshack is being crap, so I'll post URLs from here on in. Optics via bush. Optics through a bush from the same spot (look hard enough and you'll spot one of Paraiso's buildings). Optics via grass. Optics through the grass from the same spot. Downtown Paraiso. Paraiso's streets (I assume it's the most densely urbanised area on Sahrani). Desert (inland). Looking towards south Sahrani's biggest mountain from the beach. Desert (seaward). Looking out to sea from the same spot. Northern forest. The gamebreaker - smack bang in the forests of the north drop the FPS below 25, but it looks bloody nice, and is still quite playable, mind you. Pics done with: Intel E6600 C2D @ 3.6GHz (went up another 100MHz just for this). ASUS EN8800GTX @ 630/1050 (2100) MHz ASUS P5W DH Deluxe 2GB Corsair @ 633MHz. So yeah, it runs just above your deadline in most areas, excepting the deep forests of the north. Like I said in another thread, in more open areas, such as Bagango, average FPS is 35-40. What I've also noticed is that the 8X AA is quite a killer, and gives the biggest performance drop when being used. If one drops back to 4X things get noticeably smoother (~5-10 FPS gain). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites