mp_phonix 0 Posted June 9, 2006 Are you sure that it do only have semi auto? If i'm not wrong, its is based on M16A2 rifle, and also have brust fire. I think Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
prodetar2 0 Posted June 9, 2006 Are you sure that it do only have semi auto? If i'm not wrong, its is based on M16A2 rifle, and also have brust fire. I think if u play americas army u should know that the spr only has single fire but the russian vintorez does have auto just wanted say that continue on the good work at ffur Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
echo1 0 Posted June 9, 2006 if u play americas army u should know...... I think the SPR is just a new upper for the M4, not too sure if that affects its full auto-ness or not Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mp_phonix 0 Posted June 9, 2006 if u play americas army u should know ..... But I don't play AA, therfore, I do not know  keep up the great work FFUR ! Tb, those metal stuff in the editor are great, but you should make them more less visible, because it does heart the eye a little  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wilco 944 Posted June 9, 2006 Thanks for the kind words, 'glad you appreciate the new enhancements.Quote[/b] ]TB myabe you will change the "Ural_wreck" with wrecked urals from Spetsnaz MOd ural pack ? maybe make it random model so everytime it will be another model of wrecked ural ? {Spetsnaz Urals have several wrecked models} Sounds good to me, this would hopefully be done and the same goes to 'wreck jeeps' as well. Quote[/b] ] BTW have you changed the name from black Op to something else. Regards Thunderbird84 I frequently use the editor alot, and in my opinion I think you should go back to the OD color because it's nice and easy on the eyes.  The color it's at right now would probably gey annoying to me after awhile, but OD never fails to make me happy. Just a friendly comment  Oh hey, when do you want that radio transmission Thunderbird? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted June 9, 2006 the reason its semi auto is its a marksman weapon its not based on the m16a2 its the m4 psr or MK12 Mod0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
echo1 0 Posted June 9, 2006 Its based on the M4 Lower, with an upper with a heavy 18" barrel Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Elite SEAL 0 Posted June 9, 2006 I don't know, why a M4 SPR? when you could say replace it with a M468 (provided ch gets it finished before FFUR eventually gets released. Either the carbine or "Marksman varient".) 6.8mm SPC versus 5.56mm, not much of a argument there in terms of which is more powerful/deadly or efficient. Only issue being populating ammo crates/trucks (and select mission briefing "loadouts") with 6.8mm for the SF lads to use as needed, but I can't picture that being overly difficult. Personally I think this would be a brilliant idea espiecally seeing as how FFUR '06 is supposed to be "modern" no? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
_Nebular_ 0 Posted June 9, 2006 Cause there is already one in the sjb weapon pack,and we're not sure is the sof really used much 6.8 weapons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
456820 0 Posted June 9, 2006 How about adding random types of fires, eg smaller fires and less smoke then some other time where there could be more smoke and more fire? Means if you blow up several tanks the effects dont all look the same and it will cause less lag. Anyway the specops are looking fab. Edit - Also is it me or do i think the left arms pocket on the BDU blackop looks very simillar to the BAS one and textures? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kroky 1 Posted June 10, 2006 RegardsThunderbird84 @thundirbird First of all I would like to gratulate you for FFUR2006. I've been away from ofp for about one year, came back and I'm really impressed how ffur advanced since then. Very good addon choice very good effects and the best anims used that the community made! One question: Would you be so kind and make a ECP 1.085 compatible version of FFUR2006? That would rock the world! I mean this would be the holy grail! The best replacement mod with the best realism mod combined! Kurayami made EECP. But 0.44 is outdated and it seems that he doesn't have the time to make any progress on the new version. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Totala 0 Posted June 10, 2006 Played COOPS with Team mates and FFUR2006 config yesterday ... lovely Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
echo1 0 Posted June 10, 2006 One question:Would you be so kind and make a ECP 1.085 compatible version of FFUR2006? That would rock the world! I mean this would be the holy grail! The best replacement mod with the best realism mod combined! Lol, the amount of times that has been asked, someone should put a little sign up somewhere about it. Unfortunatly, they are seperate and will remain seperate it seems Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted June 10, 2006 6.8 isnt as good as 6.5 believe me i know and keep it up tarik we need this to play with Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
echo1 0 Posted June 10, 2006 ive never heard of the 6.5mm being used in Iraq, but the 6.8mm seems to be quite popular with the SpecOps. Personally, I think the Specops should have an SR-25 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mp_phonix 0 Posted June 10, 2006 should have an SR-25 rrr I hate that gun  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted June 10, 2006 whats wrong with it it packs a punch and its semi auto... the 6.5 is better than the 6.8 because it is supersonic to 1000+ yds and fitsinto a standard m16 mag etc... anyways this useless debate will annoy mods no doubt... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big-Rooney 5 Posted June 10, 2006 Hey TB84 Loving those new editer names. Will they be the same on the russian side. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
echo1 0 Posted June 10, 2006 Two things: 1) The officers should get their Berets back: Sure, its more realistic for them to have helmets, but it looks really odd in cutscenes to have the likes of Col. Blake and Guba in Res campaign to be dressed up in combat gear. It also makes 'kill the officer' missions a bit difficult though I spose thats the point. However, maybe you could have Officer (Hand Gun) with helmet and Officer [standard] with beret because its generally that one that gets used more often. Maybe you should just have the beret back altogether. 2) Somewhat less drastic: could you rename the 'AK47 CZ' to Sa. 58? I dunno where BIS got the AK47CZ idea... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chipper 0 Posted June 11, 2006 I think cause it's the Czech version of the ak-47. thats y Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
franze 196 Posted June 11, 2006 2) Somewhat less drastic: could you rename the 'AK47 CZ' to Sa. 58? I dunno where BIS got the AK47CZ idea... Actually in this case, the Vz.58 assault rifle isn't the same as the AK47. Internally it's different even though externally it looks the same. See this for more information. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wheitmann 0 Posted June 11, 2006 The thing I don't get is why BIS included burst-fire on the AK's... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ti0n3r Posted June 11, 2006 It was meant to be used by the AI Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
echo1 0 Posted June 11, 2006 It was meant to be used by the AI They seem to work fine without it, but interesting - I nevr thought of it that way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbuck 9 Posted June 11, 2006 but when u see that lsr did it you have to respect the idea p.s ch check the 468 thread Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
