Which addon has been done to death?

[pzvg 0]

Well, you've already decided what YOU don't need.

Good for you, now take the next step and just NOT DOWNLOAD it.

Christ, you people are such control freaks, "make it this way, texture it this way, don't make another one of those 'cuz I like the one I have."

This is why I stopped working on addons for the public, I make what I want to play with,

Selfish? probably, but there's a lot of that around, ain't there?

[Acecombat 0]

Hmm does look familiar doesnt it

Chalk up another M-4 in the making...

I have so far seen 5-6 Tigers that are being made or have been made you can go check out the ones at ofp.info that are released and go to 5-6 ww2 website mods and see how EACH and EVRYONE of them is busy making another one...

@pvzg: I have already said it so i wont repeat it , we arent ordering anyone , BUT if you have such a brain which immediately starts following everything he see's/reads as an order then you need a reality check

[ruff 102]

for me

as long the m4 is at bas standard and a diferent sight

like the one in the tears of the sun or a nightscope etc

thats fine with me

and only if its jam compatible

i rekon all the ppl hu made m4s as their first addons should try makin sprs with different customs

[ruff 102]

I have so far seen 5-6 Tigers that are being made or have been made you can go check out the ones at ofp.info that are released and go to 5-6 ww2 website mods and see how EACH and EVRYONE  of them is busy making another one...

i believe thats pretty true

b4 wen ofp first came out i thought saving private ryan missions

but after a year of absence and finding the ofp community and finding out how many types of ww2 mod there are im scared of downloading one

id rather wait for the mod to finish since they usually are massive dowloads

i reckon they should all join up like 2 ww2 mods were doin on ofp cz news i read

theyll finish the mod faster and produce better addons

[Baron von Beer 0]

Out of curiosity, what HMMWV pack is that one from? I have quakergamers, but that one looks different (better, IMO).. unless it IS that pack... (maybee I have an older version or something?)

[Acecombat 0]

Yes thats what my point was too ruff if you make a M-4 try and make it a bit different and also it must be good too.

And Baron that is from the czech BHD mod they are also making the same Deltas as BAS and hummers too and dont forget the M-4's

[stgn 39]

Well if BIS made that 'M-4' as you say its Old now so its not the standard anymore how can you compare it with that>? Its like comparing Gastovski with BAS deltas  

what are you talking about comparing it, cause it dosen't excist in the public(maby BIS still go it). I was just telling you that BIS I think made a M4 first(cause there are M4 taxtures which are much better than the ones that got on the M16 and the XM177 is classed M4) and then changed it in to a XM177 nothing more nothing less.

Quote[/b] ]@STGN mind explaining as i said previously what are these inknown load outs which we dont know  about and HOW are they makeing a WORLD OF DIFFERNECE in OFP gameplay ... its a gun its used to kill in the game thats it..... but thats me i guess i wouldnt care if it had a stupid tac-light infront of it or not cause its a bloody game you will not notice the difference because in OFP these things have limitations.  

Well i like to mount assories on my rifles (it looks more cool I think) I know that the weapon ain't gona change how it shoots and you can't have laser, light or infrared but to me that dosen't mater that much. I like to dream(not the right word but it covers what I mean) me into the game and it is somtimes collere to run around whit a M4 whit ACOG,M203 Tactical light, infrared pointer, c-mag and so on(exaggerated) and maby just a M4 whit out assories if I am during a covert up mission where I don't need to shot and it there for would be a waste of wight.

If you only care if your gun has granade luncher or not thats fine But don't complain about it.

Quote[/b] ]Out of curiosity, what HMMWV pack is that one from? I  have quakergamers, but that one looks different (better, IMO).. unless  it IS that pack... (maybee I have an older version or something?)

thats from the Cezh BHD MOD it ain't released yet.

STGN

[stgn 39]

Yes thats what my point was too ruff if you make a M-4 try and make it a bit different and also it must be good too.

And Baron that is from the czech BHD mod they are also making the same Deltas as BAS and hummers too and dont forget the M-4's  

No they are not, BAS's Deltas are modern while the ones are they are making is from 1993.

and as far as I ´know it is CAR-15's(the ones prior to M4) and not M4's.

STGN

[Baron von Beer 0]

I see. Well, since neither is out now though,

I see no Red Rider yet? *sniff* I was hoping to make a mission where you are sitting by the Christmas tree, only to have your father point out a mysterious object behind the desk.....

[Acecombat 0]

Quote[/b] ]No they are not, BAS's Deltas are modern while the ones are they are making is from 1993.

and as far as I ´know it is CAR-15's(the ones prior to M4) and not M4's.

STGN

Big whoop

Is it the same CAR-15 like in the BHD game by Novalogic? , still looks very much like a M-4 though if they config it well and a bit different according to its spec then perhaps one might note a difference otherwise i'd feel ike having another M-4 around

As for those sights which your talking about youre right i wouldnt care about what taclight or laser shit is on my gun i just wanna use it to shoot ingame thats it i hardly get the time to look at the gun when a firefight is on ... but unless someone just stares at the gun's accessories ingame then itsOK

[stgn 39]

Quote[/b] ]No they are not, BAS's Deltas are modern while the ones are they are making is from 1993.

and as far as I ´know it is CAR-15's(the ones prior to M4) and not M4's.

STGN

Big whoop    

Is it the same CAR-15 like in the BHD game by Novalogic? , still looks very much like a M-4 though if they config it well and a bit different according to its spec then perhaps one might note a difference otherwise i'd feel ike having another M-4 around  

As for those sights which your talking about youre right i wouldnt care about what taclight or laser shit is on my gun i just wanna use it to shoot ingame thats it i hardly get the time to look at the gun when a firefight is on ... but unless someone just stares at the gun's accessories ingame then itsOK  

don't know but the CAR-15 as fare as I know is a SMG and not a carbine.

I like what Germans call gail or somthing don't know the english word.

STGN

[Acecombat 0]

Galil?

I think the IDF uses them too.

[Gollum1 0]

Galil?  

I think the IDF uses them too.

That´s an IDF rifle, no one uses it besides the IDF IIRC.

[Eviscerator 0]

Galil?  

I think the IDF uses them too.

That´s an IDF rifle, no one uses it besides the IDF IIRC.

The Columbian Army use the Galil.

[GoOB 0]

Just a quick question here. Is Seademon and AKM74 the same person? If not here goes

I belive that Seademon made a quite excellent BTR-80, it had a few bugs but overall it was a great add-on. Then AKM74 comes and makes a great BTR-80. It's really good, but you see no one complaining about "We already have a BTR-80 you dimwit!" In this case Seademon made an excellent BTR-80, and AKM74 made another one. Wich was indeed also great. But yet no complaints, the same can be said about BAS making M4's AFAIK there were several next to flawless M4 packs out before BAS released their M4's. And yet no complaints when BAS released their M4's. IMHO this whole discussion is silly, addon makers will do what they want to do. The might take suggestions from the community but they will do what they want to do.

You can't just say "STOP MAKING M4's WE ALREADY HAVE GOOD ONES!!" Each addon maker makes what he or she wants to, and if that is to make a few more M4's then so be it. Then I might agree with the fact that it's a bit sad that we are seeing alot of the same stuff nowadays I don't really care. If I don't want it I wont download it. Simple as pie.

[Acecombat 0]

No G00b seadeamon made BTR-70 and AKM made a BTR-80 so i find them both different models

[stgn 39]

Galil?  

I think the IDF uses them too.

no  no    not the Galil. Geil(I spellet it rong) is a word that in this topic means somthing like adding alot of stuff that just makes the gun/car look more cool by adding things that dosen't need to be there for it to do its porpuses.

It is not only the Germans that call the gun Galil which you know.

STGN

[Pathy 0]

I think the only people who are really bothered by duplicate addons are those who have made one themselves, and see the production of new ones as either a threat to what they made (scared of someone saying the new one is better than thiers), or that people are not satisfied by what they made previously....

[Acecombat 0]

I think the only people who are really bothered by duplicate addons are those who have made one themselves, and see the production of new ones as either a threat to what they made (scared of someone saying the new one is better than thiers), or that people are not satisfied by what they made previously....

No Pathy so far i have said that and i havent made a full working addon yet so ...

[Pathy 0]

then you have no right to critisise anyone who has...anyone who has managed to get something ingame deserves at least a "well done" even if the addon isnt good....

[Acecombat 0]

then you have no right to critisise anyone who has...anyone who has managed to get something ingame deserves at least a "well done" even if the addon isnt good....

Yes ofcourse he does.

But the argument never was about the addon being good or bad it was about being duplicated , if someone tomorrow makes a crappy workable Aircraft carrier i'd give him a medal for it because he did something original for a change.

[Pathy 0]

even if he made a crappy m4 he still deserves a measure of achievement, because, i know you found modelling hard yourself, so you have to agree, it takes alot of effort to make something, no matter how well it turns out.

If there is something like the WW2 mods simultaneiously making 10 versions of the same thing, THEN i agree, thats not about pushing boundries or making what you like, thats about mods competing to see whos best...

...and thats my point....alot of people dont like duplication because they feel its competition for them.....

[Acecombat 0]

OH noooo

More M-4's ...

More M-16s..

M-16s didnt BIS made them.....i cant remember?

[Gollum1 0]

LOL Acecombat: The second I saw those weapons at ofp.info I thought "what would acecombat think!"

[Acecombat 0]

LOL Acecombat: The second I saw those weapons at ofp.info I thought "what would acecombat think!"

Hehe right , what even got my attention was all these new M-4s are now beginning to look too much suspiciously like INQ's , though that M-16's is just ..plain useless to make (thats what i think)

And one more interesting thing It was a Russian Mod who madethat M-4