Screenshot ripped out of the ofp2 flash file

[Balschoiw 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">You cannot hit a man size target over about 300m from standing with any military rifle.<span id='postcolor'>

Why not?

We even train on ducked targets on 400m´s and I more than once hit them.

[mrukas 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote ([CCCP]Stalker @ April 24 2003,18:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM NO TO NAM We alrady have SEBNAM pack and that's enough. And there won't be any Soviets if it will be NAM game. I think the game SHOULD be based aroud fiction events that took place nowadays or at least it the same 80s-90s<span id='postcolor'>

well brothers and sisters, lets just put or hands together and pray that there will be no NAM for ofp2

[Warin 0]

Well, it's like..23 days to E3, so we'll know then

I am hoping for somehting European, rather than Vietnam. I am not down on Vietnam, and there hasnt been a genuinely GOOD Vietnam game yet, but I'd rather see something like CWC than Vietnam.

[Necromancer- 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Balschoiw @ April 24 2003,18:58)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">You cannot hit a man size target over about 300m from standing with any military rifle.<span id='postcolor'>

Why not?

We even train on ducked targets on 400m´s and I more than once hit them.<span id='postcolor'>

The average soldier is not a Rambo like you.

[Jacko 0]

If you look at the gun you'll see that something is wrong in the middle

So i think the front is an ingamemodel and the back with the man is just a picture.

I'm not a gun expert so i could be wrong too

Lets wait and see

[TaNK_Em 0]

I dont know hmm i think we should just wait for more info from BIS before we go starting to many rumors or something...

[theavonlady 2]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (TaNK_Em @ April 24 2003,21:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I dont know hmm i think we should just wait for more info from BIS before we go starting to many rumors or something...<span id='postcolor'>

But once we hear from BIS, they won't be rumors anymore.

[bn880 5]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Miles Teg @ April 24 2003,08:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">As for realism, I like realism, but remember it's a game. If it was ultra realistic, alot of people would not play the game much because it would be too frustrating. If they do include things like random weapon jams, they should have settings for turning the levels of realism on or off.<span id='postcolor'>

Exactly! This I know is a big issue at BIS, the decision between realism and playability. My suggestion is bring it all on, with options in the difficulty/realism settings.

For instance, every time I fly a chopper in 1.91, I feel short changed that I cant merge different controller axis to fly it, and that I have no real rotor pitch control etc.

[vektorboson 8]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Antichrist @ April 24 2003,14:05)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Graphics in the screenshot look not that impressive. Actually they don't look any better than in OFP! Hope its not an actual screenshot from OFP2 or I will be really dissapointed!  <span id='postcolor'>

Actually, I don't want better graphics, I want just better engine, with the limitations removed, better collision detection and clipping, better ammo handling. Graphics are not important (well since I have an old PC) to me, what I actually want is a flashpoint version 2.0 or better

[theavonlady 2]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bigpoppa @ April 24 2003,21:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">5--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Antichrist @ April 24 2003,145)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Graphics in the screenshot look not that impressive. Actually they don't look any better than in OFP! Hope its not an actual screenshot from OFP2 or I will be really dissapointed!  <span id='postcolor'>

Actually, I don't want better graphics, I want just better engine, with the limitations removed, better collision detection and clipping, better ammo handling. Graphics are not important (well since I have an old PC) to me, what I actually want is a flashpoint version 2.0 or better  <span id='postcolor'>

I'm willing to bet that OFP2's minimum and recommended system requirements will move up several notches over OFP1's.

So what you really want is a Pentium 6 running at 6Ghz with 2048MB RAM and a 512MB GeForce 6 video card.

[MelaB 0]

Im sure, OF2 will be situated in Vietnam . There is many games about Vietnam and I don't like it. Why Vietnam

Did you hear about Battlefiled Vietnam? It will be big competition for OF2

[andersgrim 0]

Before ofp got out i said i didnt like historical games - only now-time or future actiongames like IGI,SOF and so.

But BIS made ofp in such a good way, that i got more interest for such coldwar games!

I think it's a bit stupid to start analyzing all signs of ofp2 as a nam game. Then it's not the same excitement waiting for this new game. But i am sure BIS know exactly what they are doing, and that this will turn up as another great czech production

Lets all just close our eyes and wait for middle-may and this E3 conference!

[Schoeler 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ April 24 2003,20:39)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bigpoppa @ April 24 2003,21:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Antichrist @ April 24 2003,14)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Graphics in the screenshot look not that impressive. Actually they don't look any better than in OFP! Hope its not an actual screenshot from OFP2 or I will be really dissapointed!  <!--emo&<span id='postcolor'>

Actually, I don't want better graphics, I want just better engine, with the limitations removed, better collision detection and clipping, better ammo handling. Graphics are not important (well since I have an old PC) to me, what I actually want is a flashpoint version 2.0 or better  <span id='postcolor'>

I'm willing to bet that OFP2's minimum and recommended system requirements will move up several notches over OFP1's.

So what you really want is a Pentium 6 running at 6Ghz with 2048MB RAM and a 512MB GeForce 6 video card. <span id='postcolor'>

LOL. I'm starting a savings account so that I have the money to upgrade to the latest system by the time OFP2 comes out.

It's driving me nuts, but I swear that picture is of a Marine firing over a wall in Hue City during Tet of '68.

I have it somewhere, but I'll be damned if I can find it!

[ShadowY 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (NeZz_DK @ April 23 2003,23:44)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I took out the shot of the man with the M60 from the flash file

Hope you like what you see

looks like vietnam!<span id='postcolor'>

My guess is that this picture comes very close and it`s a NAM site

I think finding the lookalike picture was kinda easy..... if I thought earlier about the German(I think it`s German) OFP NAM site

I think they were very silent bout the Flash\picture if you concider this one in a mirror and heavely edited from their NAM pictures section

I would say the best one win if he can make the same kinda picture out of this one

My guess is you come very close if you start with mirroring it

[Azatoth 0]

Screen - 100% fake

NO NAM !!!

NO NAM !!!

[hovmand 0]

Just to go against the flow.

NAM NAM NAM I WANT NAM!!!!!

I seriously dont care.

EDIT: And stop bitching about it, i am sure they have already made up their mind.

[Azatoth 0]

NAM - NO !!!

BALKANS - YES !!!

[Antichrist 0]

I wish OFP2 was about Balkans too!

[Gummi 0]

NAM, sure if the modding tools and engine is nice.

And it would be the greatest thing ever if BIS would then release a update/mod like res. about a more modern war, even if it hadn't a campaign.

[GuyKorn 0]

NAM NO!

PHILIPPINES! YES!! FIGHT AGAINST THE ABU SYAFF!!

[Azatoth 0]

NAM - NO !!!

PHILIPPINES - NO !!!

BALKANS - YES YES YES !!!

Bosnia Civil War 1992-1995

Albania Civil War 1997

Croatia War with Serbia 1991-1995

Macedonia Ethnic Conflict 1990s

Serbia Kosovo Secessionist Movement 1990-1999

Yugoslavia Disintegration 1990s

NATO Invasion 1999

[ExtracTioN 0]

The best would be GWC.

But if they make tunnels in mountens with caves some high grass river with crocodiles than I go for NAM and hope this time BIS makes a Aircraft Carrier for us

If they make it so than everyone will be happy with NAM

[Antichrist 0]

The screenshot is fake!!!! Here's the proof (property of my friend seifer)

[LaPoieto 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Azatoth @ April 25 2003,03:04)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">NAM - NO !!!

PHILIPPINES - NO !!!

BALKANS - YES YES YES !!!

Bosnia Civil War 1992-1995

Albania Civil War 1997

Croatia War with Serbia 1991-1995

Macedonia Ethnic Conflict 1990s

Serbia Kosovo Secessionist Movement 1990-1999

Yugoslavia Disintegration 1990s

NATO Invasion 1999

<span id='postcolor'>

I'd like it too. I just finished reading a book on it,but its not likely. There is already a mod for this, Bosnian Killing Machines.

[PuNkErS 0]

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Antichrist @ April 24 2003,14:05)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Graphics in the screenshot look not that impressive. Actually they don't look any better than in OFP! Hope its not an actual screenshot from OFP2 or I will be really dissapointed!  <span id='postcolor'>

i agree