MintyBoy 0 Posted March 17, 2003 Just wanted to add my 2c and say what a lovely addon this is! The russians have needed a light utility/(kinda)attack chopper for a while now. This is going to one of the mainstays in my Russian missions from now-on. And it's cute as well! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AirwolfPL 0 Posted March 17, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (smogmorph @ Mar. 17 2003,00:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">well, it rotates in a funny way depending on from which view you're seeing it from.. oh well no biggie  Just had my first crash Right into a gas station, weird thing was that I survived.. and so did the chopper  <span id='postcolor'> It's not suprising because if you want to animate something continously using custom animations you've to animate it forward and then backward in a loop, so object isn't rotating in one direction - it's oscilating... Anyways I don't think it's a big problem if object is rotating at high velocity... PS.: I'm going to check new Mi-2 NO ASAP. I'm sure they've improved a lot of things and it's really final version PS2.: My Mi-2 should be released in less than 2-3 week (I know I've told before that it will be released before the end of February but things gone complicated in my life :/) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KaRRiLLioN 0 Posted March 17, 2003 How long has the Mi-2 been in service? What year was it first introduced? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Abrams 0 Posted March 17, 2003 1960 - project MI-2(B-2) start 1961 - first model 1963 - MI-2 is flying 1964 - introdiced in Poland 1992 - end on MI-2 production Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capitaine Haddock 0 Posted March 17, 2003 Just a quick post to say how much fun I'm having with this Mi-2. Can't stop flying it Great new interior textures, btw Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N.o.R.S.u 0 Posted March 18, 2003 Hmm just noticed that AI machine gunners don't want to shoot at Mi-2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OxPecker 0 Posted March 18, 2003 Well, Ai machinegunners wont shoot at the M1-17 or Mi-24 either, so at least it's inkeeping with the game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KaRRiLLioN 0 Posted March 19, 2003 So I guess it'd be unrealistic to use the Mi-2 for some NAM missions eh? It's an awesome addon BTW. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
earl 0 Posted March 19, 2003 It seems the windows are much more difficult to see through than other aircraft or vehicles. Anybody else notice this? It's a great addon, I really like it, but that's one thing I noticed that hurts it a little bit. I found it very hard to track ground vehicles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eviscerator 0 Posted March 19, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (KaRRiLLioN @ Mar. 19 2003,06:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So I guess it'd be unrealistic to use the Mi-2 for some NAM missions eh? It's an awesome addon BTW.<span id='postcolor'> No, the NVA had a few Mi-2/4's. Enough to warrant their use in a game... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jahve 0 Posted March 19, 2003 I thought the NVA didnt have airsupport Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LightBringer 0 Posted March 19, 2003 earl: The window is almost crystal clear here, so the problem is on your pc... BTW. the effect of the windows, when they got shoot, is really funny... it looks like some molten plastic, whit a few holes... CU. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eviscerator 0 Posted March 19, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Jahve @ Mar. 19 2003,11:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I thought the NVA didnt have airsupport<span id='postcolor'> the north vietnamese air force had a lot of equipment, cargo planes, fighters/ground attack Mig-15/17/19/21 and SU-7, the helicopters were normally hidden, but they did have them and used them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2stoned2kil- 0 Posted March 19, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Koolkid101 @ Mar. 16 2003,22:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">hahahah I'm gonna download first.<span id='postcolor'> thats sooo lame ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Abrams 0 Posted March 19, 2003 Our Weapons Project is planning to relise MI2T as civilian and MI2US(with machine gun) as Resistance after 4-6 weeks. Improved version of MI2urn will be included... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Johann "onn" Bitsoenn 0 Posted March 19, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Abrams @ Mar. 19 2003,18:27)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Our Weapons Project is planning to relise MI2T as civilian and MI2US(with machine gun) as Resistance after 4-6 weeks. Improved version of MI2urn will be included...<span id='postcolor'> Will you release the version with fixed heavy MG mounted on side? (as on the pictures in previous thread bout Mi-2)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dkraver 1 Posted March 19, 2003 Abrams have your team thought about joining forces with the Red Star Studios??? It would be much better and faster having one big team doing Russian hardware than two teams making it and possible some of the same things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
munger 25 Posted March 19, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (dkraver @ Mar. 19 2003,17:59)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Abrams have your team thought about joining forces with the Red Star Studios??? It would be much better and faster having one big team doing Russian hardware than two teams making it and possible some of the same things.<span id='postcolor'> I agree. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DPS -CCCP- 0 Posted March 19, 2003 I don't think so. We different projects though we go in one direction. At us little bit different purposes. But we are always glad to cooperate with our comrades:) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-CCCP-Stalker 0 Posted March 20, 2003 9--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (DPS [CCCP] @ Mar. 19 2003,229)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I don't think so. We different projects though we go in one direction. At us little bit different purposes. But we are always glad to cooperate with our comrades:)<span id='postcolor'> Yeap. We have some difference in our main goals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SelectThis 0 Posted March 20, 2003 To make the heli targetable by AI machinegunners all you need to add (usually) is the line "accuracy=5.0;" into the cpp. SelectThis Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2stoned2kil- 0 Posted March 20, 2003 a KA-52 would make me happy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
munger 25 Posted March 20, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (2stoned2kil| @ Mar. 20 2003,15:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">a KA-52 would make me happy <span id='postcolor'> I'm looking forward to the Mi-28. That's a real beast of a gunship. AH-64D? Pah! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DPS -CCCP- 0 Posted March 21, 2003 Here new screen of civilian (police) version of MI2. It has 8 passengers and more fuel with exterrior fuel tanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sn1per 0 Posted March 21, 2003 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (DPS [CCCP] @ Mar. 21 2003,12:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Here new screen of civilian (police) version of MI2. It has 8 passengers and more fuel with exterrior fuel tanks.<span id='postcolor'> Just wish you would release a version with mg on the door. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
