Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Conure

Really enjoying it but...

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I am enjoying the game but sometimes it feels very poorly made. I also play the DCS sims (A10 and Black Shark) so I understand the CPU needs of these types of games...The game can be running at 50fps but feel like it's running at 20...Is this normal? I dont know how to describe it, it feels...Sluggish?

My pc specs are..

Core i5 @ 2.8 (but clocks itself up to like 3.2 when gaming)

4gb ddr3 ram @ 1200mhz

GTX 460 SE 1gb

On all normal graphics with post processing off, I am averaging probably 38fps...Though I have a large monitor and this is at 1900-1200..

Does this sound about right? Will I be at a big disadvantage online with this FPS?

Thanks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...Sluggish?

Turn off vsync and lower render frames ahead as far as possible. (0, if crashes occur then 1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey there

thanks! V sync off..How do I change render frames?

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either in your driver settings, or in your ArmA2OA.cfg file. (Open it with notepad)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also try...

Reduce the "Aiming deadzone" in options.

Reduce to zero the mouse "Smoothing" in options.

(This game is much more CPU demanding that DCS)

Edited by EDcase

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will try those things guys. Thanks!

Sometimes my game drops to like 28fps...Is that considered very low for this game?

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, that is quite normal. FPS is mostly mission dependant since this game is very heavy on the CPU and its mostly up to the mission maker how CPUheavy a mission is.

Generally i prefer lower but stable FPS over a higer average FPS with low and high spikes since its easier on the eyes/brain if its stable, so if your FPS jumps up too high sometimes you may consider just increasing your GFX settings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, that is quite normal. FPS is mostly mission dependant since this game is very heavy on the CPU and its mostly up to the mission maker how CPUheavy a mission is.

Generally i prefer lower but stable FPS over a higer average FPS with low and high spikes since its easier on the eyes/brain if its stable, so if your FPS jumps up too high sometimes you may consider just increasing your GFX settings.

I think my main worry was that at 28fps I certainly couldn't pull off Cod (or even battlefield) esque quick shooting. Though I have a feeling even the fibua in this game is probably quite slow paced?

Also, is there much in the way of online squad action? I love DCS for the coordinated coop with other people. Is this game more of a "go online and own" game, or more about the developed communities?

Cheers :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Also, is there much in the way of online squad action? I love DCS for the coordinated coop with other people. Is this game more of a "go online and own" game, or more about the developed communities?

Cheers :)

I would say its more about communities. Try to get in a certain group and play with them regulary, it beats pubbing. That said, i rarely/never play online nowadays. :rolleyes:

And yeah, you dont need a high FPS. Actually, the only reason people like certain (very high) FPS's in CoD is that there is a very old Q3 engine bug that allows you to jump a certain height according to your FPS, and you get the best results with 250 or 333 or something ridiculously high that you never need in any other game. In ArmA you can play with whatever FPS feels right to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This game need only 24+ FPS to play. If you want 60+ FPS, please go to COD\MOH\BF etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This game need only 24+ FPS to play. If you want 60+ FPS, please go to COD\MOH\BF etc.

I cant agree with that rule: "This game need only 24+ FPS to play".

Why is this game any different? Is it slower and more tactical?

Having a low FPS is never good. Not in Arma 2, not in COD, not in BF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I cant agree with that rule: "This game need only 24+ FPS to play".

Why is this game any different? Is it slower and more tactical?

Having a low FPS is never good. Not in Arma 2, not in COD, not in BF.

I would agree, the FPS isn't about the smoothness of the visuals but it is also a measure of the game's reaction times to control inputs etc.

If you want 60 FPS, get a GTX580. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

most of the time im stuck at 25frames or bit below with a EAH6950 and the bottlenecking Phenom 1 X4 9850 in my system that prevents frames from getting over a certain limit with many AIs present but i can play pretty ok with that so nothign to bother that much.

From what i gather a new fast CPU like the Sandy Bride models will boost your frame rates extremely as A2 is a real CPU eater.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would agree, the FPS isn't about the smoothness of the visuals but it is also a measure of the game's reaction times to control inputs etc.

If you want 60 FPS, get a GTX580. ;)

First of all, a new GPU won't help at all. Can't run AI on it.

You are talkin' about control inputs and I agree.

1. Low FPS makes me ill/sick/tired after a while. Can't take it.

2. Low FPS makes the controls extra sloppy.

3. Makes recording with Fraps/Playclaw extra hard. If you want smooth 30 FPS.

This game gets away with so many things. According to the forums.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First of all, a new GPU won't help at all. Can't run AI on it.

You are talkin' about control inputs and I agree.

1. Low FPS makes me ill/sick/tired after a while. Can't take it.

2. Low FPS makes the controls extra sloppy.

3. Makes recording with Fraps/Playclaw extra hard. If you want smooth 30 FPS.

This game gets away with so many things. According to the forums.

I should have mentioned a fast CPU and RAM helps too.

About your "slow" Raptor, try Disktrix Ultimate Defrag. You can assign more commonly used programs to the outer part of your drive platter and increase loading speeds etc and it certainly keeps your drives in good nick.

A decent tool if you like to squeeze every last bit of performance out of your machine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I should have mentioned a fast CPU and RAM helps too.

About your "slow" Raptor, try Disktrix Ultimate Defrag. You can assign more commonly used programs to the outer part of your drive platter and increase loading speeds etc and it certainly keeps your drives in good nick.

A decent tool if you like to squeeze every last bit of performance out of your machine.

Thanks for the tip about the HDD.

But my Ramdisk is still way faster. Too bad I'm only getting out around 11GB for it. And my mb doesn't handle 32GB of RAM.

An SSD is on it's way. At least faster than standard HDDs.

And again about CPU. I won't upgrade that for a while. It's pretty fast. The problem lies in Arma 2.

Finally, Battlefield 3 is on it's way. Would like to see some good mods. ACE/Proper stuff. Could be a real killer. There are some very good mods in Arma 2 but they can only take it so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This game will guarantee you a smooth FPS if your CPU has a clock speed of 4000Mhz/4Ghz and must be a Quad Core Processor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This game will guarantee you a smooth FPS if your CPU has a clock speed of 4000Mhz/4Ghz and must be a Quad Core Processor.

True, even the difference between my old QX9650 @ 4.2GHz and my i7 at stock speed, never mind it's current 4.2GHz, was quite noticeable.

I think 4 true cores is the way to go with ARMA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This game will guarantee you a smooth FPS if your CPU has a clock speed of 4000Mhz/4Ghz and must be a Quad Core Processor.

Not true at all and you know it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Game runs pretty smooth for me on dual core @3.6 + 460gtx.

Im not buying into the Quad thing is a necessity just yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To those of you with high end CPU's, how well does the game perform for you?

I have an HD5870 graphics card which is really good, but my PC only has an old dual core which isn't great. I was thinking of getting a sandy bridge but I'm not sure if I should try to budget for an HD 580 as well, or if my current card would be enough?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CPU upgrade will help you get better performance.

Stable overclocking will give you an extra FPS too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×