TSAndrey

This mission has to be the hardest arma mission ever. Seriously, WTF? First we approach the complex, ok that's good, so far so good. I get in the truck, it's empty, then a whole army starts attacking the base. Ok, it's a bit hard, but I managed to pull through without my team. I even managed to steal the 2nd truck, by sniping everyone there alone. But guess what? The moment I take the truck out of the base, some random APC starts shooting hellfire at me and destroys it! Now what? I'm supposed to find yet ANOTHER truck, drive over to the convoy route, plant charges and detonate them? Is this mission created for humans? Why are there APC's every 50 meters?!

I had that oilrig, until a worker screwed up and caused an explosion. Oil prices have seriously increased since then...

At one point, promises and words become meaningless and there need to be actual improvements to performance

Ok? OK?!?! That PC is amazing and the single fact that your FPS drops to 25 proves that the game is broken!

What's the point of Multiplayer if we're FPS-restricted to small scale coop missions then? You can't blame the mission makers for BI's broken game! Even in BI's official mission End Game the FPS is still horrible.

Well, End Game is a good gamemode but the FPS is horrible. Can people now please stop saying it's the mission makers fault for low FPS?

FFV? Bipods? 3D Editor?

Normal performance

It's not "sometimes", it's always like that. If the server is slow or the mission is "unoptimized", clients will CPU bottleneck and you will get 15-20FPS no matter what.

Doubt it. Arma 3 has very big netcode/engine issues. DX12 could maybe help a bit if it increases CPU performance, but it won't solve Arma 3's performance issues.

If you find a way to make it work, please release it!

LOL People need to stop making posts like this (no offense). If he gets low FPS like that in SP, then yes it could be a problem, but MP FPS is unfixable.

System requirements have basically no meaning. Only CPU is important and even that will only get you a couple more FPS.

OP is right though, Arma 3 is borderline unplayable. Fanboys can lie to themselves, make up reasons and defend the game all they want, but it won't change anything. ---------- Post added at 18:18 ---------- Previous post was at 18:16 ---------- It never got fixed in A2. I have the same horrible FPS in A2 like I do in A3, which is silly considering the graphic difference.

Haha, no it's not.

A new GPU won't help you at all. You'll still bottleneck like everyone and get low FPS. A new GPU will only allow you to play at higher graphic settings while playing at low FPS. A new CPU might help a bit, but the FPS will always be low.

Even if Arma is presenting real life well, it shouldn't. Arma shouldn't be that realistic. Stop it with the double standards! Fatigue/sway was fine on release, I don't know why they ever changed it.

I've been wondering about that for a while. How the hell can people play with 15-20 FPS? The same applies to DayZ

Unplayable is unplayable. Nobody cares if it's better than some XY game, that doesn't make A3 any better. KOTH is unplayable, just like most other high populated/heavy missions (Wasteland, RPG).

I haven't seen any FPS increase since the release. I'm not talking about server FPS.

Upgrade to an optimized game

What's wrong with Wasteland? It combines the intensity of worrying about your gear with Arma's realism and gameplay. Although it is missing any large scale battles...

Walking speed is fine, but I do agree that the weapon sway mini-game is silly (to say the least).

You only need to open 2302 and 2303. If you opened those, it should work

You need to open ports, which is still a pretty bad solution considering we didn't have to do that before.