Saint Warrior 10 Posted August 17, 2009 Hello everybody, I remember those old OFP times when you had to hit the dirt during any hostile engagement, creep and change positions constantly in order to score kills. Taking into considerarion, I was playing at recruit settings. I am in Manhattan Mission of ArmA 2 already and game more and more seems like an entertaining walk through enemy territory. I am encountering lone Chedaki which shoot a couple of shots and run nobody knows where (don't flank my unit but just ran), other Chedaki squads are also comprised of scattered lonely fighters. Yes, you can die suddenly if you miss a machinegunner's position on your flank, but that happens damn rare. I lack action so far. I am using steam version of ArmA II 1.03. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trickster1982 10 Posted August 17, 2009 Try driving along the road to the place where you have to arrest that guy on manhattan, I was ambushed by a horde of chedaki there with RPG's & all sorts! Also when you encounter the main camp theres a fair bit of resistance there! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Noraf 0 Posted August 17, 2009 try playing at a different difficulty setting ? :P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sparks50 0 Posted August 17, 2009 For me, OFP is definatly much easier on veteran, and I can kill about twice as much AI before biting the dust. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
11aTony 0 Posted August 17, 2009 You cant really bite the dust here or sneak in prone to objective becouse you cant see anything. And I just cant play without grass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sparks50 0 Posted August 17, 2009 Even with grass turned off, Arma 1 and 2 is easily harder than OFP was under standard veteran settings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
max power 21 Posted August 17, 2009 BIS tweaked the AI in different difficulty settings so that there is more difference between them. If you're playing it on recruit or something I think this may be what you are experiencing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted August 17, 2009 The low FPS in campaign, combined with how boring it is, combined with how buggy and cheesy it is, combined with how crappy the story line is, combined with the awful voice overs and acting, completely draw me away from the campaign. I tried it about three times, i will never, ever try again. However, the editor is the best thing in the history of ever, that instantly makes this game amazing for me. No one could ever get bored with such a fantastic editor. Its just too bad the campaign is so crappy, makes me wonder why they even included it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakerod 254 Posted August 17, 2009 Its just too bad the campaign is so crappy, makes me wonder why they even included it. Because some of us like it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Relemar 10 Posted August 17, 2009 Hello everybody,I remember those old OFP times when you had to hit the dirt during any hostile engagement, creep and change positions constantly in order to score kills. Taking into considerarion, I was playing at recruit settings. I am in Manhattan Mission of ArmA 2 already and game more and more seems like an entertaining walk through enemy territory. I am encountering lone Chedaki which shoot a couple of shots and run nobody knows where (don't flank my unit but just ran), other Chedaki squads are also comprised of scattered lonely fighters. Yes, you can die suddenly if you miss a machinegunner's position on your flank, but that happens damn rare. I lack action so far. I am using steam version of ArmA II 1.03. make your own missions and play MP, much better ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Binkowski 26 Posted August 17, 2009 make your own missions and play MP, much better ;) I second this statement. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kidnapster 10 Posted August 17, 2009 am i the only one that actually thinks playing around in editor over MP is more fun? i tried some of the MP and its not as fun to me as making my own missions and playing around in the editor Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted August 17, 2009 Yeah, for really fun Cold War Crisis style engagements, you need to utilize the fantastic editor. Once you grasp its basic capabilities, you will be creating great missions before you know it :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel 0 Posted August 17, 2009 Or even better, find a bunch of people who make missions in the same style as you, make loads of missions and play them online! Then you're getting the most out of the game. I havn't played singleplayer since OFP. ...had a hard time beating Abandoned Armies anyway... :p Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bulldogs 10 Posted August 18, 2009 Yarr, I love throwing random armies together on random area's of the map. That's the great thing about FP/Arma, it's easy to throw scenarios together in moments. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
max power 21 Posted August 18, 2009 The low FPS in campaign, combined with how boring it is, combined with how buggy and cheesy it is, combined with how crappy the story line is, combined with the awful voice overs and acting, completely draw me away from the campaign. I tried it about three times, i will never, ever try again. However, the editor is the best thing in the history of ever, that instantly makes this game amazing for me. No one could ever get bored with such a fantastic editor. Its just too bad the campaign is so crappy, makes me wonder why they even included it. I like the campaign. I thought the acting and script got better as they went along, like as the actors were settling into the roles. I liked Robos monologue about 'psycho extremists'. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites