Goodspeed 0 Posted March 8, 2002 Ok guys, i've just patched my game to ver. 1.46. And first thing what I saw that was inexplicable underestimation air characteristics of Hind. May be I'm wrong, may be.. Try to fly on Mi-24 with 1.46 patch and try to do that on 1.30 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpaceAlex 0 Posted March 8, 2002 Better flying in v1.46. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jamesia 0 Posted March 8, 2002 My computer is temporerily messed up so I can't even play operation flashpoint let alone install new patches. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Goodspeed 0 Posted March 8, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (SpaceAlex @ Mar. 08 2002,19:27)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Better flying in v1.46. <span id='postcolor'> U didn test, it isnt it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpaceAlex 0 Posted March 8, 2002 All i know is that v1.30 flying sucked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ex-RoNiN 0 Posted March 9, 2002 Actually, 1.3 is better than 1.0 IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maddock 0 Posted March 9, 2002 Flying in 1.46 is the best it has ever been. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Goodspeed 0 Posted March 9, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Maddock @ Mar. 09 2002,01:58)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Flying in 1.46 is the best it has ever been. Â <span id='postcolor'> If you're tolking about Cobra then YES Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aculaud 0 Posted March 9, 2002 while we're on the subject of things being done to russian choppers in OFP, how about making it so that an AA rocket actually takes them down for a change. The only NATO choppers that can take more than one rocket are the two transports, the UH-60 and chinook. both of the attack choppers are easily swayed by as little as one enemy AA soldier. whats up with this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Unl33t 0 Posted March 9, 2002 i posted about this ages ago. The US heli's take around 1 AA missle to go down the Russians take quite a few more Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WKK Gimbal 0 Posted March 9, 2002 Face it - Russian choppers are better armored Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Incredible 0 Posted March 13, 2002 nooooooooooooooooooooooo!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Antichrist 0 Posted March 13, 2002 Face it! Stinger is pretty damn powerful missile as well as Strela! In real life it will take down any attack helicopter with one shot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpaceAlex 0 Posted March 13, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (WKK Gimbal @ Mar. 09 2002,11:22)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Face it - Russian choppers are better armored <span id='postcolor'> Hinds armor is very good, but one AA rocket should destroy it without problems. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supah 0 Posted March 14, 2002 A hit from a Stinger doesnt take down a hind period as the mujahedin found out the painfull way. Sure a hit to its rotor of gearbox may force it to land in a fast way but it has a fair chance of survival. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Benze 0 Posted March 14, 2002 Hind tailsection = zero armour. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tovarish 0 Posted March 14, 2002 There were many cases of Hinds and Su-25's making it back to base after being hit by a stinger in Afghanistan. I remember reading about an su-25 that made it back after 2 missile hits Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aculaud 0 Posted March 14, 2002 did those missiles explode? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
-RaR-FoX 0 Posted March 14, 2002 Well it think that v1.46 Has better Flying then any other update Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aculaud 0 Posted March 14, 2002 as for air characteristics blown out of preportion, i just tried flying a hind and iv got 1.46. Still feels the same to me, still a big hurky gunship with in accurate anti tank missiles Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LauryThorn 0 Posted March 14, 2002 Those russian choppers are almost impossible to drop. I haven't used any American military stuff, but the military stuff( cars, trucks, tanks, weapons ) that come from Russia seem to be very rough, very tough, very reliable, very simple, and very uncomfortable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
InRange 1 Posted March 14, 2002 Yeah, Russian stuff lasts forever. The AK-47 too. A kid could operate it (which they do in Africa). It hardly ever jams, but it's a bit inaccurate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whisperFFW06 0 Posted March 14, 2002 Just to add a comment, AA missiles almost never hit their target. They explode near the target, but do not hit it. That's perhaps why they are named missile, because they miss . It is the frags and ....well....(help me, I don't know the english term : souffle) from the explosion which takes down the target. With their heavily armor on the bottom, and the shape of the chopper, a missile exploding below a Hind won't do enough damage to entirely takes down the chopper. Mostly, it will damage engines, and if lucky, rotor and/or transmission system. It will be worst for the chopper if the missile explode at the same altitude or above it (as vital parts are on top of the chopper). If I remember well, but I'm not sure, Apache as some armor too, but weaker (made essentially to resist to bullets, not missile explosion), made of composite materials. It doesn't have the heavy armor existing on the bottom of the Hind (the blue part in OFP), I think (if anyone could confirm...) Whis' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
advocatexxx 0 Posted March 19, 2002 I have the 1.46 and I think that airplanes can turn way too quickly. I mean I can make a 180 degree turn within 4 seconds, at 600 km/h. That would put the pilot past 12Gs. I know this isn't a real flight sim. But more basics would be helpful. I also haven't noticed any difference when flaps are extended. I watched from the outside view, and the airplane's angle of attack has not changed - neither has it slowed down one bit. If they included flaps, then perhaps they should have them cause the appriopriate effects. That way only truly qualified pilots would get into the planes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites