mazza 1 Posted April 19, 2006 Sorry Placebo, didn't use from beginning Could we please have an update (if available). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NSX 8 Posted April 19, 2006 Will it be enough to run AA on maximum on this machine: 3.8+ AMD64,2 Gb RAM,6600GT (as an alternative 7900GT a bit later)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
berghoff 11 Posted April 19, 2006 Quote[/b] ]as an alternative 7900GT a bit later -_- noo plz not another pimp pc topic. Come on, thats nearly better than BIS best alpha test setup :/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NSX 8 Posted April 19, 2006 @Berghoff.I have 6600 GT right now.7900 will come in the beginning of the June.So I interest how will go on this vcard right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grayace 2 Posted April 19, 2006 I have; Sempron 3000 512Mb with 128Mb ATI X700 (notebook) Celeron D 2.8 512Mb with 128Mb GF 6600GT (old) Pentium4 3 64 1024Mb with 128Mb GF 6600GT (new) OFP:R 1.96 Notebook gives around 32+ fps with DxDll water reflection in effect Celeron always prones at 8-14 fps, no water reflection Pentium gives 20 fps 30 at most, no water reflection I really wonder what would AMD 64 3000+ with 6800GT or higher give? around 100fps I think Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mazza 1 Posted April 19, 2006 Because parting with my mula/soldi/cash is taken serious. I wish to make sure I have a system which can handle AA. Now if there is not required system specs and the ALPHA post is the best to go from, then so be it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nubbin77 0 Posted April 19, 2006 Quote[/b] ]Because parting with my mula/soldi/cash is taken serious. I wish to make sure I have a system which can handle AA. Now if there is not required system specs and the ALPHA post is the best to go from, then so be it. Is there a particular reason you need upgrade right now then? If money is a concern then why not wait until the game is released or about to be released. By doing that 1) You will know what the hardware requirements are for certain 2) Every day you wait to upgrade, the cost of components go down. So if Arma is your reason for upgrading, then wait until the last minute. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mazza 1 Posted April 19, 2006 Quote[/b] ]Is there a particular reason you need upgrade right now then? If money is a concern then why not wait until the game is released or about to be released. By doing that1) You will know what the hardware requirements are for certain 2) Every day you wait to upgrade, the cost of components go down. Good point, but AA is not the reason I am upgrading. It's one of the reasons , but not the only. Basically my good ol XP2100+ box is showing its age. Crunch crunch etc. PLus there are other games which I wish to experience with the settings turned to Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nubbin77 0 Posted April 19, 2006 Ok, the question makes more sense now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Metal Heart 0 Posted April 19, 2006 Well ArmA will be like OFP, nothing is enough because somebody will always make more demanding mods, addons and missions. That and you can bring any home computer on it's knees with the gfx settings. So buy the best stuff you can afford, within the performance/price ratio that is acceptable to you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
berghoff 11 Posted April 19, 2006 well a sort of system like ofp:e (mission points) would come in handy to keep mission in the limit of the recommended specs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scrub 0 Posted April 19, 2006 Isn't that great? Â Anytime I can bring my computer to it's knees, I Â know either something awesome is happening, or something really piss poor. Â Example: Pimped up ArmA = something great (Bad design software + complex assembly = Â Â Â ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bravo 6 0 Posted April 19, 2006 Ok, the question makes more sense now. Makes more sence now indeed. My machine:<ul>Pentium® 4 CPU 3.00GHz, 1.00GB RAM, Radeon 9700 PRO AGP, Internal DAC(400MHz) 128MB might be enough to run ARMA smooth and detailed? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grayace 2 Posted April 20, 2006 AMD processors are much more capable of running OFP at decent speed tough I have P4 3.00 EMT64 with 1024Mb RAM... my laptop has Sempron 3000 with 512Mb and it runs LOT (x2) faster than P4 in OFP of course... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LT.Schaffer 0 Posted April 21, 2006 My Specs AMD 3500+ 2.2GHZ 2 Gig Ram 6800 Ultra 256MB I think my Computer is ready for ARMA Can't wait for a demo!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kevbaz 0 Posted April 21, 2006 will arma benifit from being run on a dual core machine? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Metal Heart 0 Posted April 21, 2006 Don't all games do? Even if they are not capable of using multiple cores them selves, the OS can run background processes on the other core thus allowing more processor time to the game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kevbaz 0 Posted April 21, 2006 well i guess they do, but what i meant is if you have a dual core will ofp recognise that and use it to its own benifit? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites