iNeo 0 Posted February 16, 2005 WCOTY.com (Press release) <span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>1.</span> Audi A6 - Score: 721 <span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>2.</span> Volvo S40/V50 - Score: 719 <span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'>3.</span> Porsche 911 - Score: 718 Quote[/b] ]Audi A6 Named World Car of the YearTORONTO, Canada - February 16, 2005 The Audi A6 sedan emerged from a field of 36 competitors to claim the inaugural World Car of the Year award at a ceremony held here today, during the media preview for the Canadian International Auto Show. [...] "The voting was far more than just a popularity contest," Malloy said. Initially, jurors assessed the cars on the basis of 20 separate parameters, ranging from styling and comfort to performance and fuel economy, to develop a short-list of ten finalists. [...] The Audi A6 edged out the Volvo S40/V50 and Porsche 911 in a close race for the overall award. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Homefry 0 Posted February 17, 2005 Hmm, I was actually thinking of getting a Volvo later on in the year... perhaps I will... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cozza 24 Posted February 17, 2005 bloody volvo drivers dont know what means then u havnt seen the Volvo adds Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted February 17, 2005 I'm sorry. I just don't understand the voters. Who wouldn't go for a Porsche in contrast to a stodgy Audi and Volvo? Who particpated? Amish countryfolk? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blackdog~ 0 Posted February 17, 2005 What about the new mustang? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brgnorway 0 Posted February 17, 2005 I'm sorry. I just don't understand the voters.Who wouldn't go for a Porsche in contrast to a stodgy Audi and Volvo? Who particpated? Amish countryfolk? Now, how on earth would you be able to stuff all of your kids into that lovely 911 2+2 Avon Anyway, the cars are judged be relative progress and succses in each cars segment. The Audi is among the most awful and overrated automotive designs I've ever seen. And one should expect the inventors of the "quattro" system was able to build a descent 4wd without integrating that horrible understeering! The Volvo is actually very nice - especially in its V50 estate version. It's also a drivers car! It's is in all respects a good car despite its Ford Mondeo underpinnings. But then - that is the fashion nowadays as for example all the VW brands share the same platform such as Audi/VW/Seat/Skoda. The Porsche is as ever a safe bet. Good looking, good dynamics and cheaper than a Ferrari - and unlike with a Ferrari you don't always walk around with a fallen off part in your hand. I'd take both thankyou  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted February 17, 2005 Now, how on earth would you be able to stuff all of your kids into that lovely 911 2+2 Avon Precisely why I love it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shadow 6 Posted February 17, 2005 I'm sorry. I just don't understand the voters.Who wouldn't go for a Porsche in contrast to a stodgy Audi and Volvo? Who particpated? Amish countryfolk? Not enough room to install a decent soundsystem. How the hell can one install a 15" in the back? oh wait, is'nt that the engine? under the hood then?  ...somethings just plain wrong with that car  I don't care for these awards. My car (your average 97-model Seat Cordoba) has 4 wheels, 4 doors, great stereo, good strong dynamo, starts every time and takes me from A to B. Thats all I need. I don't need to pay extra to get an award-winning car. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Badgerboy 0 Posted February 17, 2005 What about the new mustang? We are talking about well built cars! I saw the UK review of the Mustang, lets just say, don't try to take any corners over 20mph, or assume the interior will still be intact inside of a year. >shivers< Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iNeo 0 Posted February 17, 2005 I'm sorry. I just don't understand the voters.Who wouldn't go for a Porsche in contrast to a stodgy Audi and Volvo? Who particpated? Amish countryfolk? If you look on the score table you see the parameters: merit - value - safety/environment - significance - wow Plus this (from judging): Quote[/b] ]Forty-eight jury members from around the world have begun the process of driving, and evaluating, the list of eligible vehicles using a standardized 0 - 10 rating scale and a detailed rating form, comprising twenty-three separate evaluation parameters. They include acceleration, braking, vehicle dynamics, safety features, visibility, even cargo and off-road capability, where applicable.Once vehicles have been evaluated according to the twenty-three standardized parameters, a final ballot will employ a ranking system that considers a combination of merit, value, and market significance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shashman 0 Posted February 17, 2005 Thirty Six contenders??? Considering the amount of cars there are on the market, I find that kinda crappy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Billabong81 0 Posted February 17, 2005 Thirty Six contenders??? Â Â Considering the amount of cars there are on the market, I find that kinda crappy Agreed...though Volvos are nice cars Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JAP 2 Posted February 17, 2005 What about the new mustang? We are talking about well built cars! I saw the UK review of the Mustang, lets just say, don't try to take any corners over 20mph, or assume the interior will still be intact inside of a year. >shivers< Gotta love Top Gear I can understand the first two, but wtf is the porsche doing in the list. 0.00something % of the world population can affort it. Not exactly a "world car" Cheers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EiZei 0 Posted February 17, 2005 Still not giving up my 190hp volvo 740 station wagon w/ turbo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4 IN 1 0 Posted February 17, 2005 What about the new mustang? We are talking about well built cars! I saw the UK review of the Mustang, lets just say, don't try to take any corners over 20mph, or assume the interior will still be intact inside of a year. >shivers< Gotta love Top Gear I can understand the first two, but wtf is the porsche doing in the list. 0.00something % of the world population can affort it. Not exactly a "world car" Cheers well for atless porsche 911 is a good car, as even James May got one OK.....an old one but anyway, who cares? Â Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bn880 5 Posted February 17, 2005 I'm sorry. I just don't understand the voters.Who wouldn't go for a Porsche in contrast to a stodgy Audi and Volvo? Who particpated? Amish countryfolk? Me for one. I'd 10x more like to have that Volvo or actually even a Saab than that impersonation of a real car. This is assuming I have to pay for each. What ever happened to Saab? I think they make some neat stuff even beating Volvo in some regards. Audi A6 before the volvo, hahaha , wankers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted February 17, 2005 I'm sorry. I just don't understand the voters.Who wouldn't go for a Porsche in contrast to a stodgy Audi and Volvo? Who particpated? Amish countryfolk? Me for one. Â I'd 10x more like to have that Volvo or actually even a Saab than that impersonation of a real car. Â Â This is assuming I have to pay for each. And if you didn't have to pay? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tovarish 0 Posted February 17, 2005 What ever happened to Saab? Â I think they make some neat stuff even beating Volvo in some regards. Seen their new commercials here lately? They are trying to use the fact that not many people here drive Saabs to make them seem like an original and exotic choice. "Saab, the state of independence" *chuckle* "We don't sell many of these....so if you buy one, you'll be cool and original!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bn880 5 Posted February 17, 2005 I'm sorry. I just don't understand the voters.Who wouldn't go for a Porsche in contrast to a stodgy Audi and Volvo? Who particpated? Amish countryfolk? Now, how on earth would you be able to stuff all of your kids into that lovely 911 2+2 Avon Anyway, the cars are judged be relative progress and succses in each cars segment. The Audi is among the most awful and overrated automotive designs I've ever seen. And one should expect the inventors of the "quattro" system was able to build a descent 4wd without integrating that horrible understeering! The Volvo is actually very nice - especially in its V50 estate version. It's also a drivers car! It's is in all respects a good car despite its Ford Mondeo underpinnings. But then - that is the fashion nowadays as for example all the VW brands share the same platform such as Audi/VW/Seat/Skoda. The Porsche is as ever a safe bet. Good looking, good dynamics and cheaper than a Ferrari - and unlike with a Ferrari you don't always walk around with a fallen off part in your hand. I'd take both thankyou Man come on, the Porsche is just a bitch to drive. It is impossible to handle once it enters a spin and it's butt ass ugly (face it), plus it's not confortable and you can't see anything out of it. It is very over rated, and currently it's kind of a big loser in the racing scene. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bn880 5 Posted February 17, 2005 I'm sorry. I just don't understand the voters.Who wouldn't go for a Porsche in contrast to a stodgy Audi and Volvo? Who particpated? Amish countryfolk? Me for one. I'd 10x more like to have that Volvo or actually even a Saab than that impersonation of a real car. This is assuming I have to pay for each. And if you didn't have to pay? Porsche to sell for a Ferrari. Tovarish: commercials have nothing to do with the actual car you buy, that is all handled by the marketing department. By the way, by going to the website and clicking on Winners, I see totally different results. Volvo in 10th. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EiZei 0 Posted February 17, 2005 I'm sorry. I just don't understand the voters.Who wouldn't go for a Porsche in contrast to a stodgy Audi and Volvo? Who particpated? Amish countryfolk? Me for one. I'd 10x more like to have that Volvo or actually even a Saab than that impersonation of a real car. This is assuming I have to pay for each. And if you didn't have to pay? Porsche to sell for a Ferrari. Nothing but a glorified fiat. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bn880 5 Posted February 17, 2005 Well, my view is ten fold in favor of a F550 or 575 than any Porsche for example, and I'll just be quiet because we are not at a race track where one can campare them and see. Quote[/b] ]Nothing but a glorified fiat. Similairly, nothing than a glorified VolksWagen. (people's car, origins WW2) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
llauma 0 Posted February 17, 2005 By the way, by going to the website and clicking on Winners, I see totally different results. Â Volvo in 10th. You see the ten finalist in alphabetical order.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bn880 5 Posted February 17, 2005 Thanks Well, this organization seems to be a little silly then... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brgnorway 0 Posted February 17, 2005 Man come on, the Porsche is just a bitch to drive.  It is impossible to handle once it enters a spin and it's butt ass ugly (face it), plus it's not confortable and you can't see anything out of it.  It is very over rated, and currently it's kind of a big loser in the racing scene. Hi love  I have to admit the 911 is starting to grow on me lately..... Between the 993 of the nineties and the 911sc (made untill 1983) as seen in 4in1's post I have to agree that it was dead ugly. But still, the 911s dynamics always comes out on top when a new version was presented to the market. It's simply fantastic, it shouldn't work with an engine in the back - let alone behind the rear axle - but it does! Despite still being a challenging drivers car it has also become quite docile compared to the time before they radically changed and updated the suspension. And even better is the fact that it has become so common and thus kind of "classless" compared to other alternatives. I like it - but I prefer the no-nonsense Caterham Seven! Oh, and it's still winning races in the FIA GT Championships. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
