Duke_of_Ray 0 Posted August 19, 2002 Those sick frekas should be treated like the worthless garbage they are. They are worth no more than a piece of crap! Errrr...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KingBeast 0 Posted August 19, 2002 I dont like it at all, but what do you think the US or any other country with biological or chemical weapons uses for testing? Robots? Manequins? They all use animals, and whereas I love dogs and it makes me mad, its no more sick and freakish than gasing monkeys, sheep or mice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duke_of_Ray 0 Posted August 19, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I dont like it at all, but what do you think the US or any other country with biological or chemical weapons uses for testing? Robots? Manequins? They all use animals, and whereas I love dogs and it makes me mad, its no more sick and freakish than gasing monkeys, sheep or mice.<span id='postcolor'> I think using dgos is worse, mice are a pest anyways. It may be as bad to us monkeys and sheep, but not mice, the more dead mice the better. Anyways the reason these sick people where doing this is even more disturbing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KingBeast 0 Posted August 19, 2002 How exactly though is it any different to the reasons that Western countries develop such weapons? They both develop these things to kill people. I doubt they used a dog out of pure hate or malice either. I doubt there were many Monkeys out in deepest darkest afghanistan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duke_of_Ray 0 Posted August 19, 2002 They want to kill those who never botherd them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ex-RoNiN 0 Posted August 19, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Duke_of_Ray @ Aug. 19 2002,23:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Those sick frekas should be treated like the worthless garbage they are. Â They are worth no more than a piece of crap! Errrr......<span id='postcolor'> Better than the US military and CIA who conducted NBC testing on their own personell and people.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Warin 0 Posted August 19, 2002 Wow. using dogs to test weapons of mass destruction. those sick bastards! After all no sane nation would do such a thing! Judge not, my man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tex -USMC- 0 Posted August 19, 2002 Yeah, I gotta say, gassing dogs is kind of way down there on my list of reasons to wage an international war. Dont get me wrong, I like dogs and hate seeing them harmed, but really, this aint all that big a deal. Using animals to test lethal agents is a sad, but ubiquitous thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KingBeast 0 Posted August 19, 2002 If it were cats or spiders that were gased, I would be lacing my marching boots and flying out to join Al Queda by now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drewb99 0 Posted August 19, 2002 Anyway, on to the rest of the video... I'm not really all that afraid of the Al-Quada, it's hard to take a group seriously that feels the need to waste 2 AK47 mags on killing single journalists locked in a car or training by shooting a 30-foot picture of Bush (And still missing ). They're so high on Opium and Khat over there that we should just sit back and let them kill themselves. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duke_of_Ray 0 Posted August 19, 2002 Name me one sane nation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Espectro (DayZ) 0 Posted August 19, 2002 Greenland? They kill animals for eating... ... Of course they have that US-base (Zulu-base) which ruins everything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duke_of_Ray 0 Posted August 19, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Switzerland<span id='postcolor'> Hows that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tex -USMC- 0 Posted August 19, 2002 They stay neutral, they make money by keeping other peoples money safe, and they keep to themselves Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
moerty 0 Posted August 19, 2002 hhhmm, i would say the sanest nation might be the netherlands, they're very advanced when it comes to social ideas and ethics, at least there is none to compare amongst the other countries. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aculaud 0 Posted August 19, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Duke_of_Ray @ Aug. 19 2002,14:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Those sick frekas should be treated like the worthless garbage they are. Â They are worth no more than a piece of crap! Errrr......<span id='postcolor'> After reading that story, my sympathy against the US military presence in Afghanistan went down a bit more....This is disgusting Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duke_of_Ray 0 Posted August 19, 2002 Got to give me a few more detials than that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aculaud 0 Posted August 19, 2002 Well, testing weapons of mass destruction on animals is nothing new. The US tested nukes on pigs because they had similar skin to humans. I just hate to see animals have things like this done to them. I wouldnt exactly lose sleep over it if the place where this happened got bombed a mile into the ground... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supah 0 Posted August 19, 2002 </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (moerty @ Aug. 20 2002,01:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">hhhmm, i would say the sanest nation might be the netherlands, they're very advanced when it comes to social ideas and ethics, at least there is none to compare amongst the other countries.<span id='postcolor'> No we are not, we are a bunch of anoying dickheads ... dont come here we are awfull . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bn880 5 Posted August 20, 2002 I would wager that for them dogs are the easiest animals to acquire. That's probably why they used them. Testing weapons on any animals is not nice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphwiggum 6 Posted August 20, 2002 all this comes down to one thing. fuzzy factor fuzzier an animal is, more support it gets. i doubt if anyone would criticize tests if they used spiders or roaches or wolves. and i also don't doubt that US used dogs to test in older days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duke_of_Ray 0 Posted August 20, 2002 I wish they would use spiders, mice, and roaches. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ludovico Technique 0 Posted August 20, 2002 I think it's the mark of a civilised society that we don't test poison gas on cute animals, we test expensive perfume. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Col. Kurtz 0 Posted August 20, 2002 Tseting of purfumes, WMD, or anything else on animals should be banned. If we want to develop things for humans, we can test them on humans. All those prisoners will finnaly have some use. All convicted muderes/rapists/anything else can enjoy the delightful sensation of having things squirted in their eyes But we better be careful, the Denoir closing is approaching..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites