Dwarden 1125 Posted January 29, 2012 i would like to point (again) out that SLI and Crossfire support is from 99.9% in hands of the IHV , manufacturers of hardware and theirs drivers ... they need to put usable profiles for each game, card type and generation which covers the type of mode the dual/triple/quad GPU system will use to render the game there is no standard for multiGPU solutions (except some DX11.1 bonus but that don't affect the basics and it's not finalized yet) so while developer may optimize his engine to better support how the title behave on the multiGPU system or ensure it's stable that's all he can do ... also note that we support NVIDIA's Surround and AMD's Eyefinity to some level from time theirs libraries were first released ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
banenwn 10 Posted February 2, 2012 Well after reading around it seems I will need to OC my 1090T or upgrade to Sandy Bridge. Well that just sucks, I have never overclocked before and I'm afraid of frying my CPU. seriously dont listen to these guys.You got plenty there to run arma 2 just fine.I have a phenom 2 965 be with 2 gtx 460's and i only get a 1 fps difference between 1 and 2 cards.SLI simply doesnt work in arma 2 the way it should.I seem to get an extra 15 fps in the actual arma benchmark but the game itself i get about the same. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted February 3, 2012 You can speak from your experience and we can speak from ours. I definitely see a very significant increase in FPS with SLI enabled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grillob3 11 Posted February 3, 2012 I was wondering if Arma 3 will have better SLI support, currently I'm running 2x 560 GTX's and my performance is terrible. One card will give me 50+ FPS, running in SLI gives me only <40 FPS. So will Arma 3 have better SLI support? Have you add -winxp in your shortcut? sli/crossfire -winxp!;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
banenwn 10 Posted February 3, 2012 for most people SLI doesnt work if it works for you great but it has been an on going issue since the game cameout.To sit here and have people tell this guy a 1090T doesnt cut it and he has to upgrade is ridiculous.BangTail what kind of card do you have in SLI and was there anything special you did to get them to work properly? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rangerpl 13 Posted February 3, 2012 (edited) bigshotking, Overclocking will not fry your CPU as long as you don't let it overheat or raise the voltage too much. If you raise the CPU frequency too high, the worst thing that will happen is a blue screen of death in which case you'll just have to reboot, go in the BIOS and either increase the voltage (only if you want to push the overclock) or lower the frequency and leave it at that. I have a 960T which is very similar to your CPU, just with four cores (it's even the same kind of architecture). I was able to achieve a stable overclock on air without much difficulty, and I imagine you will be able to do the same. Basic overclocking isn't difficult, it just involves rebooting your computer and slowly bringing frequencies up, then running prime95 to test for stability. Raising voltages is more risky but should be safe as long as you stay within your CPU's specifications (I think maximum recommended voltage for you would be 1.4, that's what it is for me) I can walk you through procedures for overclocking AMD. PM me if needed. Contrary to what some of the people here are saying, a Phenom II can run ArmA 2 fairly well. Heck, I ran it on an Athlon and it was still playable. Edited February 3, 2012 by RangerPL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CameronMcDonald 146 Posted February 3, 2012 for most people SLI doesnt work if it works for you great but it has been an on going issue since the game cameout Operation Blanket Statement is go. what kind of card do you have in SLI and was there anything special you did to get them to work properly? GTX285s. Installed the driver, and selected SLi in the "Set SLi and PhysX Configuration window." Ohshi SLi enabled! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dwarden 1125 Posted February 3, 2012 remember it depends on driver You use, it must include the profiles Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragon01 902 Posted February 3, 2012 Heck, I ran it on an Athlon and it was still playable. I've played through AII and OA on an heavily overclocked Athlon, and it was quite playable, though cities were very laggy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bangtail 0 Posted February 3, 2012 for most people SLI doesnt work if it works for you great but it has been an on going issue since the game cameout.To sit here and have people tell this guy a 1090T doesnt cut it and he has to upgrade is ridiculous.BangTail what kind of card do you have in SLI and was there anything special you did to get them to work properly? 2 x 3GB 580 (Specs are in spoiler) and there are no extra steps to get it working properly. I really don't think you speak for 'most people' as I know plenty of people who have no issues with it (many of them on this forum). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rangerpl 13 Posted February 3, 2012 I've played through AII and OA on an heavily overclocked Athlon, and it was quite playable, though cities were very laggy. My brother plays A2:CO on an Athlon II X2 and it runs rather fine. It's a bit choppy but definitely playable at 1-2k viewdistances. I had an Athlon II x4 which ran even better. Chernogorsk and Zargabad would get a little laggy but the game ran quite well in general. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CameronMcDonald 146 Posted February 4, 2012 The cities are both miles away better with SLi than without. Hell, even on one card the cities run so much better now than at release. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
banenwn 10 Posted February 4, 2012 (edited) well i game on and off with over 100 people on arma and only know a handful that said they got SLI to work properly, and even the ones that did they were only seeing a 10-15 fps increase,which isnt bad i guess but it isnt great either.Im using SLI GTX 460's myself and am thinking about just going to one card and getting a radeon 7950 in a few weeks unless i can get sli to work.I know how to enable SLI it just simply doesnt work maybe i need a new driver ill test a few.I have the latest right now though Edited February 4, 2012 by banenwn Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supersix2 10 Posted April 25, 2013 Hey I'm currently running GTX570's in SLI and my screen has a constant tearing just when starting up. I've read that they're in work with Nvidia and so forth to help with these issues. Is there any reason to think that this will be soon or probably not until release? BTW, i run off just one when playing ARMA 3 due to the tearing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harry_Flashman 1 Posted April 26, 2013 If your main purpose for buying a new computer is for playing ARMA3 it would be wise to wait until it is closer to release date, this way you can take full advantage of technology that is not yet available. You mean new, future technology that wad not used in the development or testing of Arma 3? Kidding aside, I see no meaningful advantage in waiting unless you believe Intel is going introduce a new CPU with a vastly faster clock speed or designed for even more extreme OCing. Which, judging from the rumor mill, they're not. Realistically, there's not a meaningful technology advantage to waiting - unless the wait turns into a year or more. But there would be a bit of a price advantage. But probably just a small one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
liquidpinky 11 Posted April 26, 2013 2 x 3GB 580 (Specs are in spoiler) and there are no extra steps to get it working properly.I really don't think you speak for 'most people' as I know plenty of people who have no issues with it (many of them on this forum). Same, two 3gig 580s and SLi is running fine. Wonder if the others are hitting the full vram mark not allowing the cards cpus to work properly? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonschuh 3 Posted April 26, 2013 (edited) Computer Type PC/Desktop: Desktop System Manufacturer/Model Number: Custom-Build OS: Windows-8-Pro-WMC-x64 CPU: Intel Core i7 3770k @4200MHz Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V Memory: G.Skill 16GB (4x4GB) @2133MHz Graphics Card: 2x Gigabyte GTX680-SOC-2GB in 2-Way-SLI Sound Card: OnBoard Realtek® ALC892 8-Channel High Definition Audio Monitor(s) Displays: Asus VE278Q 27" Wide Led Black Full HD 2ms (Main-Screen for Gaming) + Dell S2409W 24" (for additional Desktop-Work) Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Keyboard: Microsoft Sidewinder X6 | Logitech G13 | XBox 360 Controller wired | Logitech Dual Action GamePad Mouse: Cyborg R.A.T. 7 Infection | Zalman FPSGun Mouse | Logitech G9 PSU: Antec HCG-900 900W High Current Gamer 80PLUS Bronze 135mmfan Case: Thermaltake Level-10 GT LCS Cooling: Thermaltake BigWater 850 GT Hard Drives: - Intel 520S 240GB/SATA3/R 550MBs,W 520MBs/25nm/3.5"Kit/5yr - Seagate Barracuda SATA3 1TB 7200RPM 64mb Cache - Seagate Barracuda SATA3 1TB 7200RPM 64mb Cache - Seagate Constellation SATA3 3TB 7200RPM 64mb Cache - Seagate FreeAgent USB 2.0 1TB Internet Speed: ADSL2+ ~15MBit/s DL | ~1MBit/s UL Other Info: - Logitech Extreme 3D Pro Joystick - Plantronics GameCom 777 Headset - Logitech X-210 Speakers SLI is working fine for me. I use the GeForce v320.00 Beta, but if I play around with the ATOC-Settings then I get purple Trees / Gras: http://img542.imageshack.us/img542/6531/arma32013042518112632.jpg (627 kB) I believe it's a bug within the ATOC-Settings and not Driver related, as I mentioned here: ATOC-Settings-Bug :) Edited April 27, 2013 by TONSCHUH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonschuh 3 Posted April 26, 2013 That can't be right, I just bout this CPU 6 months ago. It's 6 cores, at 3.2GHz... I can't possibly see why that would be the problem... Here you can compare different CPU's, like your 1090T vs my 3770k: Click If a Game / App is not so well suited for Multi-Core-CPU's, then the Speed of a Single-Core is interesting, beside other factors like cache. So if I have my 3770k @4200MHz and you your 1090T @3.2GHz, who would be better off ? :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites