angel24marin

You need to take the documents next to the PC inside the building.

If I'm not wrong. BIM is short range infrared missile. So is more nimble and dont need the radar on. While AMRAAM is mid range and need to use the radar.

Some info about how HEATs work: https://translate.google.es/translate?hl=&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.de1939a1945.com%2Ftecnicos%2F016cargahueca.htm But in resume, they are HE rounds that instead of affect a big area, they focus all the energy in one spot in order to defeat armour. So as the explosion is the same a cross all distancies they dont lose power. APDS FS are basically very very hard and slim proyectiles, with out any explosive. It like shooting needles. They can penetrate heavy armor but the damage caused is relatively "low". Fragmetation of the proyectile and armor and direct hits to crew or mechanical components. But a hit in an ammo rack can be fatal.

A FIA M60, may with some upgrade kit like the ones that Israel use, look appropriate IMO. CSAT should get the Armata or a Chinese tank with active protection system OTAN IMO will be fine if it only receive more variants of the actual vehicles. (Marshall with 105mm gun and bird cage armour/reactive armour, Panther with autocannon, Hunter with Titan missiles, variants with active armour(ex: trophy)...) Also is key inhibitor sistems against ATGMs. That disrupt the tracking system and spot the direction of the laser guidance. And a more visual distinction when you hit ERA.

With a max of 15mm of armour, ZSU isn't precisely a tank. A C4 charge should disable it completely.

People calling for a old school war (WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Cold War). It won't happen. Because most of the already done features like thermal, UAVs, sights, even personal armour will be out of place and become a work waste. For that reason they focus in the top tech equipment like actual prototypes but in a future setting in order to normalise his use. (May 2035 is to far and 2020-25 would have be better) because needs more professional work than for example a WW2 soldier (Character+re skin+old weapon). For that reason I only see that wars in mods and DLCs. About Aliens. I liked a lot the concept of the film Earth invasion: Battle Los Angeles. But IMO corporations figthing for the control of a distant planet fit better ArmA gameplay: https://youtu.be/ir5Pwk26v-8

My idea is to replace the generic HMG turret from MRAPs (the same in the 3 faction) with the commander turret from the respective tank. This will add variety and the possibility to identify HMG cars from GMG. AFAIK it shouldn't be difficult and will be very wellcome.

Explosion+flames is a way to say that this vehicle is totally incapacitated. May could be improved with smoke effects when motor is damaged, or fire without explosion if the fuel tank get enought damage, that could implement a Fire Protection System. About helicopter Advanced Flight model allow to take harder landings.

Also is inaccurate historically. German didn't use Tigers II (or any tank) as infantry support.

http://postimage.org

I'm having nice experiences in the North West of Altis in Antistatic campaign. The terrain help to develop guerrilla strategies and performance raids to the adjacent terrains. (Very similar to the said by the Vanilla campaing)

AI work a lot better when the player isn't the leader.

The Tanoa will be worse. Most of the Apex "resources" went to the map while vehicles, weapon, units and campaign got less love.

If you shot some .50 shots in the track it broke and AI leave...

You need to be Engineer or Explosive especially to disarm. If you shot they explote https://youtu.be/EhFF6Xc18U0

Or that have this: Merkava have something similar but more technological: https://youtu.be/2VrAUTP6rTg PD: AI is coward, they exist the tank if a track is broken. Even if the can use the cannon and the MGs.

I think that CSAT wear helmets with integrated sunglasses instead of VR glasses.

I think that Mi 28 only carry people in extreme occasion like evacuations. http://i.imgur.com/WMosA.jpg About the Mi 24, AFAIK, it acted in pairs and most of the time only one carried troops (because when load his mobility get very restricted).

A large iron bar dropped in a step fall in teory will make a explosion when the iron evaporate and incinerate the surrounding air. (It is on of the theories of Tunguska)

I like Altis, more than Cherno. (Didn't played ArmA 2). Especially since I play Antistatic campaign. Many people played a lot in Cherno and as it is little, they played in the same places so all the map is familiar and for that reason nostalgic hit hard. In Altis this is harder as is more big. (Recently discovered in the editor 2 new Outpost that I have never visited before XD) PD: I live in Spain that have the same Mediterranean bioma and is nicely represented. Sometimes I don't know if some ambient sounds like cicadas are the game or the ravine next to my window. BIS, please, next time do a cold bioma like artic, tundra, mountain or fjords. Because while playing in summer inside of my house it transmit the same 40 degrees of heat that is outside!

May Oculus solve the problems that many people complain about first person in ArmA and so moving from 3 person view. (But that dont solve the disadvantage of 1 vs 3)

Why people think that a 3D artist know about programming AI and for that reason, if he isn't doing 3D models, AI programming will be better?

Hosting a mission is very intuitive, search one coop mission in the workshop. At multiplayer, the last one option in the top called server is for host your own game. Put a name and a pass and select the mission and your friends should search it.

I remember the lore of Alfa and Beta stage saying that Russia is friendly of CSAT but that don't belong. May changed.

I miss any kind of Arena or other active defense sistems Actually someone with a Titan launcher can take off a scuad of modern MBTs (Also AI don't help because with a broken track exit the vehicle) A "DLC" aimed to the heavy armour will be good. That brings CSAT Chinese tank and other vehicles. (Most of the CSAT vehicles are Russian, but Russia don't belong to CSAT), active defense systems for some vanilla vehicles, ATGM cars and a revision of the armour DM and AI.