angel24marin

You need to take the documents next to the PC inside the building.

If I'm not wrong. BIM is short range infrared missile. So is more nimble and dont need the radar on. While AMRAAM is mid range and need to use the radar.

Some info about how HEATs work: https://translate.google.es/translate?hl=&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.de1939a1945.com%2Ftecnicos%2F016cargahueca.htm But in resume, they are HE rounds that instead of affect a big area, they focus all the energy in one spot in order to defeat armour. So as the explosion is the same a cross all distancies they dont lose power. APDS FS are basically very very hard and slim proyectiles, with out any explosive. It like shooting needles. They can penetrate heavy armor but the damage caused is relatively "low". Fragmetation of the proyectile and armor and direct hits to crew or mechanical components. But a hit in an ammo rack can be fatal.

A FIA M60, may with some upgrade kit like the ones that Israel use, look appropriate IMO. CSAT should get the Armata or a Chinese tank with active protection system OTAN IMO will be fine if it only receive more variants of the actual vehicles. (Marshall with 105mm gun and bird cage armour/reactive armour, Panther with autocannon, Hunter with Titan missiles, variants with active armour(ex: trophy)...) Also is key inhibitor sistems against ATGMs. That disrupt the tracking system and spot the direction of the laser guidance. And a more visual distinction when you hit ERA.

With a max of 15mm of armour, ZSU isn't precisely a tank. A C4 charge should disable it completely.

People calling for a old school war (WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Cold War). It won't happen. Because most of the already done features like thermal, UAVs, sights, even personal armour will be out of place and become a work waste. For that reason they focus in the top tech equipment like actual prototypes but in a future setting in order to normalise his use. (May 2035 is to far and 2020-25 would have be better) because needs more professional work than for example a WW2 soldier (Character+re skin+old weapon). For that reason I only see that wars in mods and DLCs. About Aliens. I liked a lot the concept of the film Earth invasion: Battle Los Angeles. But IMO corporations figthing for the control of a distant planet fit better ArmA gameplay: https://youtu.be/ir5Pwk26v-8

My idea is to replace the generic HMG turret from MRAPs (the same in the 3 faction) with the commander turret from the respective tank. This will add variety and the possibility to identify HMG cars from GMG. AFAIK it shouldn't be difficult and will be very wellcome.

Explosion+flames is a way to say that this vehicle is totally incapacitated. May could be improved with smoke effects when motor is damaged, or fire without explosion if the fuel tank get enought damage, that could implement a Fire Protection System. About helicopter Advanced Flight model allow to take harder landings.

Also is inaccurate historically. German didn't use Tigers II (or any tank) as infantry support.

http://postimage.org

I'm having nice experiences in the North West of Altis in Antistatic campaign. The terrain help to develop guerrilla strategies and performance raids to the adjacent terrains. (Very similar to the said by the Vanilla campaing)

AI work a lot better when the player isn't the leader.

The Tanoa will be worse. Most of the Apex "resources" went to the map while vehicles, weapon, units and campaign got less love.

If you shot some .50 shots in the track it broke and AI leave...

You need to be Engineer or Explosive especially to disarm. If you shot they explote https://youtu.be/EhFF6Xc18U0