jonpas
-
Content Count
716 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
-
Medals
-
Everything posted by jonpas
-
Advanced Combat Radio Environment 2 (ACRE2)
jonpas replied to ACRE_Team's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
Everything just works so well! :D It unmutes clients when ACRE disconnects from the game, so you don't have left-over muted people. You can't allow people who are not in-game to talk to the ones in-game, it is a design decision and we will not change it. The whole point is to prevent disruptions during the game. -
ACE3 - A collaborative merger between AGM, CSE, and ACE
jonpas replied to acemod's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
Possibly, unsure, I don't think I tested that specifically, lots of things to go through, very likely I missed some. Test it and if it doesn't work make an issue on GitHub, if it does, tell the others here! :) -
ACE3 - A collaborative merger between AGM, CSE, and ACE
jonpas replied to acemod's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
Redownload the package from GitHub. -
ACE3 - A collaborative merger between AGM, CSE, and ACE
jonpas replied to acemod's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
You can be 90% sure it will not be fixed if no one reports it on GitHub. -
ACE3 - A collaborative merger between AGM, CSE, and ACE
jonpas replied to acemod's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
Looking at already open issues on GitHub makes you spend less time writing it out sometimes, no guarantee if it'll be for next update though. -
ACE3 - A collaborative merger between AGM, CSE, and ACE
jonpas replied to acemod's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
description.ext does NOT support modifying class CfgVehicles, you need a mod, or simply use the function that was given above by @belbo. -
ACE3 - A collaborative merger between AGM, CSE, and ACE
jonpas replied to acemod's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
Thanks! Those boxes/stacks are already loadable on development of ACE3, will be released next update. Not anymore, they are coming with next update. :P -
@feint MFDs are using "vtolvectoring" source to show the angle, and HUDs are using "vtolMode". Maybe that can somehow be used. There already is a way, all VTOL aircraft have to define "vtol" config entry. So you can just check that with "getNumber (configFile >> "CfgVehicles" >> typeOf (vehicle (call CBA_fnc_currentUnit)) >> "vtol") > 0". (Use CBA_fnc_currentUnit for remote control compatibility.) @RacerXNo it's not possible, Arma has no API for joystick/gamepad buttons, so there is nothing that can be done. However Feint's mod is using CBA keybinds, so as soon as that will be possible (if ever) you'll be able to. Until then, software for your joystick outside of Arma is basically the only way.
-
We don't mind waiting. We are trying to figure out what exactly causes it rather. :)
-
But that will only help us, instead of everyone who uses the mod. :)
-
@AdacasIt seems the following uniform sets are using an old (2 years or so) base model with leg selections being underground: - Fleece + G3 Field Pants - G3 Field Set - PCU + G3 Field Pants The following set however works fine: - Tshirt + G3 Field Pants As you can see that breaks ACE3 for example, and anything using those 2 memory points (more so when prone). This bug has been fixed in sample models soon after Arma 3 release.
-
Arma Languages support for Atom
jonpas replied to glowbal's topic in ARMA 3 - COMMUNITY MADE UTILITIES
Arma language support for Atom has been updated to version 2.12.0! Changelog: - BI Commands from Arma 3 v1.76 - BI Functions from Arma 3 v1.76 - CBA Functions from CBA 3.4.1 -
Advanced Combat Radio Environment 2 (ACRE2)
jonpas replied to ACRE_Team's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
Racks, external radios and intercom overhaul are not polished enough yet for a release, so we decided to release 2.5.0 without them to get other things out. -
Yes, it should be the case at least. I guess there could be a small possibility something was missed, in which case it would probably have prefix "ca" or something that vanilla assets used in previous games.
-
ACE3 - A collaborative merger between AGM, CSE, and ACE
jonpas replied to acemod's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
1. I run that and know for a fact that it works. Are you sure you are using latest version and all that? If it still doesn't work with only latest CBA+ACE3 then put it on the issue tracker where it belongs. 2. Use -serverMod, I run this and it works just fine without whitelisting it. Same as above. -
You should definitely report that to the CBA issue tracker on GitHub then. Just make sure it's really CBA changing things, and not something else.
-
ACE3 - A collaborative merger between AGM, CSE, and ACE
jonpas replied to acemod's topic in ARMA 3 - ADDONS & MODS: COMPLETE
Likely a conflict with another mod. Make an issue on GitHub if it still happens with ONLY latest CBA and ACE3. You could edit the config with a patch PBO. Using this config value instead of the texture path for whatever goggles you want modified should do the job. ACE3 doesn't add any such Zeus module to set global AI skill level, you must be using another mod. ACE3 Medical Zeus modules do disappear if you are not running ACE3 Medical, because they rely on it. "checkPBOsAction" doesn't have a value of 3, only 0 (warn once), 1 (warn perma) and 2 (kick, which also displays warning first). Also you don't need to add "ace_server" to "checkPBOsWhitelist". Just run it with "-serverMod=" instead of "-mod=" and only on server. -
That sounds like a huge increase, are you sure something else is not at play? I wonder if server stability decreases even further with higher fps, someone should try running it for like a week and see what happens (mind, normal binary starts dying on 11th day or something like that when it runs out of floating point precision).
-
This is open forum, you speak with everyone. I clearly said no need to fight over it, I simply explained to you what is what. If each person starts using a word with their own meaning there is no discussion. You are of course free to ignore it or take it as good will so you can use it correctly the next time around. Cheers!
-
There is no reason to be worried about taking flak, it is good that people point out what all may go wrong, so that can be tested. Until we get more proper numbers (comparisons, not just what you get with higher limit) we can't say anything. And even then we don't know why the 50fps limit is there in the first place, could fuck with simulation, AI... etc. Which is NOT the definition of a "fix". Yes, you can speak about a "tweak" in this case or even "improvement", but not a "fix". If anything it's a "removal of limit". Not being a BI dev does not mean he can't make "tweaks", "improvements" or "removal of limit". Also editing with a hex editor is literally editing things inside a compiled program. You could do exactly the same with editing the source and compiling, except you have to find out at which offset it is for hex editing. No need to fight over it, but definitions are definitions, and your thinking is wrong. :)
-
All of it is always public. :D You don't have to do anything mod-side, it will all be configurable in mission or communities can set their own presets in their own mods.
-
I am just wondering what kind of ACE3 Interaction objects like this could even have. And if the thing at play is actually setting fortifications (this is a "fortifications" mod after-all) then I would suggest waiting for https://github.com/acemod/ACEX/pull/76. No extra compatibility should be required with that.
-
Could as well be false consensus without any numbers. Especially when it has been shown above that the actual numbers are so close.
-
What kind of ACE3 integration is planned?
-
What needs to be tested is Headless Clients, to see if offloading all AI to HCs still keeps high server FPS. And if that's a yes, does that in return results in higher client FPS. I have heard various reasons for the 50fps limit before, some of them being too high jumps, messing with simulation, and diminishing returns at higher player/AI counts.
