W0lle 1050 Posted April 2, 2009 (edited) Thanks for all the votes and opinions, we're going for option #2. :) Edited April 14, 2009 by W0lle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
max power 21 Posted April 3, 2009 I like the individual contributor based list rather than the department based list. I think then you get a better idea of what people have done, too. You have the name of the person, then perhaps a long list of what they have worked on, rather than hunting and pecking out a number of instances of the same name in a number of different sub-lists. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Serclaes 0 Posted April 10, 2009 if i had a voice I'd go for version 2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
W0lle 1050 Posted April 10, 2009 Every team member has a voice. :) We go for option 2 now, had the most votes already plus atleast one vote which wasn't counted because old forums voting system went fubar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
berghoff 11 Posted April 11, 2009 =) Ah nice, good to see the credit list isn't being forgotten.. Option 2 looks good. :803: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pennywise 0 Posted April 13, 2009 I'm fine with option 2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr-Murray 0 Posted April 14, 2009 Option 2 looks good ;) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Binkowski 26 Posted April 17, 2009 Yep, Option 2 for me. Looks great Share this post Link to post Share on other sites