OFP Navy

[Badassdom 0]

to start great stuff with the kuznetzov, but does that mean work on the other ships been but on hold ?

[[aps]gnat 28]

to start great stuff with the kuznetzov, but does that mean work on the other ships been but on hold ?

Nearly, but not quite.

[[aps]gnat 28]

"Krivak's fire on happless flying visitor"

.

9M317 Launch system

Not the prettiest models, but functional.

[wolfbite 8]

I wouldnt say no

[ag_smith 0]

Arghh, Gnat, please use sharp edges on the launcher thingy... it'll definitely be prettier than now.

[hellfish6 7]

Krivaks and Perrys - great multipurpose ships. I look forward to them.

Have you given any thought to landing craft or landing ships? Maybe the Alligator class for the Russians and the County class for the US? Would fit in very well in a 1985 scenario, methinks. Anything later than that and you might have to look at the Ivan Rogov or Tarawa classes.

[harley 3 1185 0]

Sverdlov class? Last of the gunned cruisers, might be good for the limited environments of OFP .

Never mind. Nice work on the Krivaks Gnat. Can't wait for the eventual release.

[Katar 0]

Sounds like we might have a need for ASMs soon.

Yep It will be cool to have battle groups. Especially if you could have escorts for both the Nimitz and Kruzenetzov. A true Carrier war

[Katar 0]

Awesoe Gnet. Cannot wait

[snowballrules 0]

just red the thred and it nice that sumones making sea units for ofp we have seen so many land and air units over the years its nice the the waters gettin populated hope it goes well guys

[[aps]gnat 28]

Arghh, Gnat, please use sharp edges on the launcher thingy... it'll definitely be prettier than now.  

hehehe .... OK done!

(Is there a manual way to manipulate lighting beyond F5, U and I ?)

<span style='font-size:11pt;line-height:100%'>OHP Class - WIP</span>

[[aps]gnat 28]

Have you given any thought to landing craft or landing ships? Maybe the Alligator class for the Russians and the County class for the US? Would fit in very well in a 1985 scenario, methinks. Anything later than that and you might have to look at the Ivan Rogov or Tarawa classes.

A bit of thought Hellfish, but its the ship-to-ship transferes that put me off ..... they'll never be realistic, they have to be scripted transferes and so on.

[hellfish6 7]

What do you mean ship to ship transfers?

All I want to do is park an LST on a beach and drive a tank or something off of it - likewise, I'd want an LHA or LHD to launch helos from or use to land my amphibious vehicles from.

[[aps]gnat 28]

All I want to do is park an LST on a beach and drive a tank or something off of it

Arh ... well, thats just as bad, keep vehicles inside other moving vehicles is a HUGE problem in OFP ...... I'm yet to see something that isn't a nightmare to use or limited is what vehicles can be attached / mounted.

Quote[/b] ]- likewise, I'd want an LHA or LHD to launch helos from or use to land my amphibious vehicles from.

More do-able for choppers, but again Tanks etc will be a problem.

I was looking at doing a MOVING one of these, but whats the East counterpart ?

[Acacyn 0]

hmm good question but that carrier looks really good.

Nice work [APS]Gnat !!! Im looking forward for the release

[Gedis 0]

Gnat, use sharp/smooth button (U/I), ships will look better...

don't forget that!

[hellfish6 7]

I know you can't put vehicles on other moving vehicles. I don't want the ships to move - I like, and prefer, having them as interactive scenery.

[Shashman 0]

Well you could make a nice model of an LCAAC for example, and the transporting of vehicles could be left to scripts? Also, that Sea Fighter, as much as it looks pretty cool, personally I'd prefer to see a more widespread LHA or LHD made. You could give it a refuelling,rearming and repairing capability

[[aps]gnat 28]

I don't want the ships to move - I like, and prefer, having them as interactive scenery.

OK, well thats more do-able, but apart from the Carriers, I'm not so interested in static ships.

Quote[/b] ]I'd prefer to see a more widespread LHA or LHD made. You could give it a refuelling,rearming and repairing capability

Well, they are rather too big ...... use PC's Tarawa, or just use the Nimitz or Kuznetsov for those functions.

I was thinking more like LSDs or LSTs for small landing craft.

[Shashman 0]

Gnat @ Feb. 28 2006,14:52)]

I don't want the ships to move - I like, and prefer, having them as interactive scenery.

OK, well thats more do-able, but apart from the Carriers, I'm not so interested in static ships.

Quote[/b] ]I'd prefer to see a more widespread LHA or LHD made. You could give it a refuelling,rearming and repairing capability

Well, they are rather too big ...... use PC's Tarawa, or just use the Nimitz or Kuznetsov for those functions.

I was thinking more like LSDs or LSTs for small landing craft.

Yeah or those

[[aps]gnat 28]

OHP Class near completion

[william1 0]

wow, wonderful i need some escort for the USS Nimitz

[[aps]gnat 28]

Done: Solid Heli decks and hangers on a movable ships.

.

.

Next: An experiment where I lock the chopper in place so when the ship starts moving it doesnt slip off the deck. Worst case they get realeased without this feature ...... seeing its probably very hard to script for the many chopper versions out there.

[Twinke Masta 0]

wow thats awsome! Can I join OFP navy team?

[[aps]gnat 28]

wow thats awsome! Can I join OFP navy team?  

The OFP Navy "team" is just me and some older model contributions from some old hands on OFP addon making ... as for "joining" Twinke .... everyones welcome to release working ships and subs under a "OFP Navy" banner .... its really only a concept to get working ships into proper OFP missions etc. i.e. For each East Ship there should be a similar West ship and so on.

Keep pluggin away on your Typhoon Class and well see what happens.