Sanctuary's Animation Pack 1.6

[crassus 0]

Woooo hooo!!!! Saturday, the last day of my work week!!

[twisted 128]

woah. twice the reason to celebrate. new sanc animations and they are getting included in wgl.

cool work indeed.

[Sovietman 0]

hey sanct, ever though about making AT walk/fire in stand up position?

[BlackScorpion 0]

Hmm... After testing this, I think I'll go back to 1.5. The standard standing is... dumb. And the guys seem to stare the sky most of the time. So...

[sanctuary 19]

Quote[/b] ]hey sanct, ever though about making AT walk/fire in stand up position?

Impossible in a replacement pack, as there is no existing standing/prone AT position to replace.

But maybe it will be included in Locke@Germany mod if he can find a way to modify the animations definitions to allow such position.

Quote[/b] ]Hmm... After testing this, I think I'll go back to 1.5. The standard standing is... dumb. And the guys seem to stare the sky most of the time. So...

You know you just have to take the file you want from 1.5 and include it in 1.6 with unpbo/makepbo ?

Going back to 1.5 just because of 1 animation file you don't like and missing all the bug fixes and new animations added in 1.6 (and so all the new animations and bug fixes from the upcoming 1.7) is a bit extreme when you can just replace that 1 file.

[sanctuary 19]

I don't like this thread anymore,

I will not read or reply in this thread anymore,

I think i will start a new thread that i will like better very soon

This thread is now so obsolete and uninteresting that if a moderator can close it, that would be a good action.

...any hint about what's to come would be accidental...

[Tomislav 0]

why do you sound so unsatisfied now? only because some where complaining?

[ade_mcc 0]

Any hints that are less than subtle, are purely accidental.

Read up a couple of posts Tomislav, I think we know why this thread is closing!

[Tomislav 0]

i only read to posts that could get the adjective "not so nice", but that shouldn't be a reason, or?

anyway, as he request to close the thread with his post it is useless to discuss about that i guess

[hardrock 1]

i only read to posts that could get the adjective "not so nice", but that shouldn't be a reason, or?

anyway, as he request to close the thread with his post it is useless to discuss about that i guess

hint hint 1.7 version coming and he doesn't want any more work than he's got right now