billybob2002 0 Posted October 27, 2004 Quote[/b] ]In the meantime, these hackers are going to pay dearly. Hackers? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IsthatyouJohnWayne 0 Posted October 27, 2004 So is Bush going to 'win' again or what? Because I expect so. But then im a pessimist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billybob2002 0 Posted October 27, 2004 Quote[/b] ]So is Bush going to 'win' again or what?Because I expect so. But then im a pessimist. We got a live one, boys!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IsthatyouJohnWayne 0 Posted October 27, 2004 hail bush, hail caesar Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Architekt 0 Posted October 27, 2004 Glad I don't live in the states, poor Canada. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Acecombat 0 Posted October 27, 2004 Its time like these when you begin exploring the positive aspects of having a dictatorship or even Kingdomship in place Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IsthatyouJohnWayne 0 Posted October 27, 2004 "Its time like these when you begin exploring the positive aspects of having a dictatorship or even Kingdomship in place" the rule of the wise? It has a certain ring to it certainly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Acecombat 0 Posted October 27, 2004 "Its time like these when you begin exploring the positive aspects of having a dictatorship or even Kingdomship in place"the rule of the wise? It has a certain ring to it certainly. Ah the ring you say , it reminds me of 'My precioussssssss' One ring to bind them all , One ring to rule them all with Imagine having that ring , bye bye elections and stupid voters. All hail Sauron er , i mean Bush. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Colossus 2 Posted October 27, 2004 Hint to all europeans, asians, middle-east people, africans, south americans... and canadians, who wish to see georgewbush.com (or other useless pro-bush junk sites ) Behold, the <span style='font-size:13pt;line-height:100%'>Proxy.Guardster!!</span> Makes you invisible for the nasty americans  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EiZei 0 Posted October 27, 2004 Hint to all europeans, asians, middle-east people, africans, south americans... and canadians, who wish to see georgewbush.com (or other useless pro-bush junk sites )Behold, the <span style='font-size:13pt;line-height:100%'>Proxy.Guardster!!</span> Makes you invisible for the nasty americans No downloading ridiclous campgain ads anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Colossus 2 Posted October 27, 2004 What's the point of blocking us when we already know how to get in. Bah! Republicans, what a joke. Good night Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shinRaiden 0 Posted October 28, 2004 Good, then you can still get in to get educated to the platform etc. But the DDOS attacks from overseas will be partially mitigated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Akira 0 Posted October 28, 2004 Good, then you can still get in to get educated to the platform etc. But the DDOS attacks from overseas will be partially mitigated. While the Bush attacks on our rights and safety continue from good ol' sweet home... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Akira 0 Posted October 28, 2004 *cue Darth Vader Theme* Quote[/b] ]Bush Voted Year's Top Film VillianWed Oct 27,10:39 AM ET Add to My Yahoo! Movies - AP LONDON - With U.S. voters soon to pass their verdict on President George W. Bush (news - web sites), readers of a British magazine have rated him the year's top screen villain. Bush won the dubious accolade, announced Wednesday, for his appearance in Michael Moore's anti-Bush documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11." He beat a shortlist that included the nefarious Doctor Octopus, played by Alfred Molina, in "Spider-Man 2"; "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre'"s cannibalistic Leatherface; Andy Serkis' creepy Gollum from "Lord of the Rings" trilogy; and Elle Driver, the eyepatch-wearing assassin played by Daryl Hannah (news) in "Kill Bill." Almost 10,000 people voted in the poll, conducted by Total Film Magazine. "It is possible that people have been a little bit tongue in cheek here, but they are also saying that Bush was very scary in 'Fahrenheit 9/11,'" said the magazine's editor, Matt Mueller. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ozanzac 0 Posted October 28, 2004 *cue Darth Vader Theme*Quote[/b] ]Bush Voted Year's Top Film VillianLONDON - With U.S. voters soon to pass their verdict on President George W. Bush (news - web sites), readers of a British magazine have rated him the year's top screen villain. Bush won the dubious accolade, announced Wednesday, for his appearance in Michael Moore's anti-Bush documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11." He beat a shortlist that included the nefarious Doctor Octopus, played by Alfred Molina, in "Spider-Man 2"; "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre'"s cannibalistic Leatherface; Andy Serkis' creepy Gollum from "Lord of the Rings" trilogy; and Elle Driver, the eyepatch-wearing assassin played by Daryl Hannah (news) in "Kill Bill." I almost fell off my chair laughing reading that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BoweryBaker 0 Posted October 28, 2004 I predict a Bush victory. He don't get a darth vader theme though when he has the star wars ending. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphwiggum 6 Posted October 28, 2004 Its time like these when you begin exploring the positive aspects of having a dictatorship or even Kingdomship in place  or a counsel of wise mods. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
denoir 0 Posted October 28, 2004 Denoir, I'm curious what your neural net predictor is projecting into the final days. Sorry, I'm sort of on vacation. Don't have the tools here to do it. I'll drop off the map tomorrow for a few days and be back 1/11. I can make a new model then, but I don't know how much meaningful that would be, given that the polling data lags at least a day or two relative the actual situation. Besides, the previous prediction was pretty crapy beyond the first three days. As I said - too little data for a neural net to work properly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted October 28, 2004 Ooops. Time to conjure up something else. Quote[/b] ]Discrepancy Found in Explosives Amounts: ABC NewsThu Oct 28, 2:10 AM ET WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The amount of conventional explosives missing from an Iraqi storage facility may be substantially less than the 377 tons reported by Iraqi officials, ABC News reported late on Wednesday, citing documents obtained by the network. The information on which the Iraqi Science Ministry based an Oct. 10 memo on the missing explosives was based on a "declaration" from July 15, 2002. At that time Iraqis said there were 141 tons of the explosives at the facility, ABC reported. International Atomic Energy Agency documents obtained by ABC show that on Jan. 14, 2003, the agency's inspectors record that just over three tons of high explosives were at the Al Qaqaa storage facility, ABC reported. The IAEA documents could mean that 138 tons of explosives were removed from the facility long before the start of the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003. The missing explosives have become an issue in the U.S. presidential campaign. Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites) has raised the disappearance of the high explosives in the campaign for the White House. Kerry said it was an example of President Bush (news - web sites) bungling the Iraq (news - web sites) war. The IAEA, the United Nation's nuclear watchdog, said the site was never secured by the U.S. military after the March 2003 invasion. Bush accused the Massachusetts senator of making "wild charges" about the missing explosives and told supporters at a Pennsylvania rally on Wednesday that the military is investigating a number of possible scenarios including that the explosives may have been moved before U.S. troops arrived at the site. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
denoir 0 Posted October 28, 2004 How about "gross incompetence in keeping tracks of the amount of explosives in the country"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theavonlady 2 Posted October 28, 2004 How about "gross incompetence in keeping tracks of the amount of explosives in the country"? How much was the "amount" in the country prior to the US invasion? How much went missing prior/after the US invasion? So far, all I've seen is gross incompetence in reporting facts. But it's more than journalistic incompetence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
denoir 0 Posted October 28, 2004 Reporters? Are they now responsbile of keeping track of explosives? The lack of answers to the questions you asked is exactly the incompetence I'm saying could be used as an argument. They've been in the place for two years and still don't know what kind of weapons and what quantities were in the country? That's not good at all. If they expect to win against the insurgents, they have to know who they're up against and how well armed they are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Albert Schweitzer 10 Posted October 28, 2004 How about "gross incompetence in keeping tracks of the amount of explosives in the country"? How much was the "amount" in the country prior to the US invasion? How much went missing prior/after the US invasion? So far, all I've seen is gross incompetence in reporting facts. But it's more than journalistic incompetence. mahaybe! Buhut how come this theft wasnt reported untill now. I may assume the american intel was prior to the war "perfectly" informed of those compounds that contained weapon material? I assume that those US-soldiers that protected the ministry of oil would have been sufficient to guard this bunker-like house with explosives! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Acecombat 0 Posted October 28, 2004 Reporters? Are they now responsbile of keeping track of explosives? Â The lack of answers to the questions you asked is exactly the incompetence I'm saying could be used as an argument. They've been in the place for two years and still don't know what kind of weapons and what quantities were in the country? That's not good at all. If they expect to win against the insurgents, they have to know who they're up against and how well armed they are. But damnit thats it its the Journalists fault , Al Jazeera especially if i may say so they were the ones who should have gone in and found out about this explosives and WMD and stuff. It wasnt the US or IAEA's job no sir they were busy doing other things like fighting militants and yelling at iran how can you expect them to do 2 2 things at once tut tu , shame on you denoir Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
walker 0 Posted October 28, 2004 Hi all When the fist US Governor of Iraq set securing and rebuilding the country as the objective he was told to make Oil the priority and when he refused George Bush Junior replaced him with Paul Bremmer. Apparently the civilian administration did not think hunting for WMD or securing the explosives used to make Atomic Bombs was a priority. They did not even bother searching the base until May 8, 11 and 27 2003 a full month after they captured it and even then did not secure it. They just left the gates wide open to all and sundry. There never was an effort to secure Iraq after the War, the borders were left wide open, The Nuclear materials that were in Iraq after the war have been looted. The specialist explosives needed to make a Nuclear bomb have been looted. All the factories with machines capable of making atomic bombs were looted too we are talking stuff that was supposed to be watched and that US satellites were spying on. Stuff that had to transported on big lorries that was there after the war looted since. They did get the Oil out though over 18 billion dollars worth has gone out of Iraq. Oh a few million has been spent on rebuilding the country. Actions speak louder than words. Kind Regards Walker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites